PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago
Talking like the distance a pass travels makes it more or less difficult is ignorance. Hitting a 5 yard slant between 3 defenders is much more difficult than throwing a 30 yards pass to a wide open WR.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Thinking a five yard slant is more difficult than completing a pass 30 yards in the National Football League (not Madden, put down the controller) is massively ignorant on levels that cannot be quantified.


BTW, the NFL thinks the performance was, umm, average, too. haha
Aaron Rodgers named NFC offensive player of the week for 13th time
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

Thinking a five yard slant is more difficult than completing a pass 30 yards in the National Football League (not Madden, put down the controller) is massively ignorant on levels that cannot be quantified.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



sorry but try reading what I stated again. It depends on the pass. I can throw 30 yards to a wide open WR, I can't throw a 5 yard slant between 3 defenders. distance of the pass has little to do with whether it is a difficult throw or not.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

sorry but try reading what I stated again. It depends on the pass. I can throw 30 yards to a wide open WR, I can't throw a 5 yard slant between 3 defenders. distance of the pass has little to do with whether it is a difficult throw or not.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



So you claim I am not reading what you're stating when evidently you're not even trying to understand what I have stated a few times? Fascinating.

As for distance having little to do with a throw being difficult or not, you are not correct with your opinion.

The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Aaron Rodgers played a smart game throwing it to the SHORT (less than 9 yards downfield) and OPEN receivers and amassed good SUM statistics.

I think most of us look at the SUM of the statistics (24 of 35 333 yards 5TD 0INT) and go WHOA he smoked them!! I wouldn't disagree, nor would anyone. HOWEVER, when you dig deeper and analyze play-by-play on how those statistics were accrued, you realize the numbers weren't as WHOA as the SUM leads us to believe.

ProFootballFocus believes if the quarterback throws an incomplete when there was a receiver they determine was in the line of sight of the quarterback, they earn a negative grade for that play.

This is the kind of in-depth thinking and analysis I don't believe many are doing. Who the hell wants to do that anyway? lol (oh yeah, me haha)
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago
You do what you gotta do to win. Clearly, the coaching staff expected the Chief pass rush to be better than our O Line, so they game-planned accordingly. Rodgers took what was available; It was plenty to dominate the game (other than some meaningless crap at the end). Not all stats are crap, but the ones that go into what was discussed at the start of this thread indeed are crap.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

So you claim I am not reading what you're stating when evidently you're not even trying to understand what I have stated a few times? Fascinating.

As for distance having little to do with a throw being difficult or not, you are not correct with your opinion.

The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



If you are reading than it is a comprehension issue. and I am 100% correct. a 5 yard slant into a tight window is far more difficult than a 30 yard throw to a receiver that is wide open. If that 30 yard pass is also into a tight window than yes that throw then becomes more difficult.

Another example is that same 5 yard slant and a bubble screen. on the slant the ball might only travel 8 -10 yards through the air, while on the screen the ball can actually travel up to 20 yards depending on where on the field the WR and QB are.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
steveishere
9 years ago


I think most of us look at the SUM of the statistics (24 of 35 333 yards 5TD 0INT) and go WHOA he smoked them!! I wouldn't disagree, nor would anyone. HOWEVER, when you dig deeper and analyze play-by-play on how those statistics were accrued, you realize the numbers weren't as WHOA as the SUM leads us to believe.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No, I think most of us just watched him play the game and thought that. Rodgers spent all game easily avoiding pressure from their great rushers and doing whatever he wanted. It was a masterful performance. I think most peoples problem is with the fact that a fumble that didn't count and an "almost interception" by a guy who had to jump in the air and got 1 hand on the ball somehow completely overshadows Rodgers dissecting that defense for 4 quarters. Forget the 5 TDs, KC had no answer for him.

I agree with what I think it was Barfan said in that this game by Rodgers exposes a flaw in the grading system where they either could not quantify something important that was happening on the field or something was off in how much weight they put into the negative plays. They had this graded as Rodgers' 3rd worst game since 2011... I have a lot of trouble seeing any way I could believe that was one of his worst games even if he only had 2 TDs and had handed off to Lacy the 3 other times.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

If you are reading than it is a comprehension issue. and I am 100% correct. a 5 yard slant into a tight window is far more difficult than a 30 yard throw to a receiver that is wide open. If that 30 yard pass is also into a tight window than yes that throw then becomes more difficult.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


I thought we were talking about the distance the ball travels in the air? You bring up tight windows into it and act like I'm the one not comprehending things here. Brilliant!

Talking like the distance a pass travels makes it more or less difficult is ignorance.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


distance of the pass has little to do with whether it is a difficult throw or not.

PackFanWithTwins wrote:


Repeating myself: The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Please note, I have not added the extra variables (e.g. coverage, pass rush, etc) to this and have been talking merely about the pass itself, specifically ... The. Distance. The. Ball. Travels. Through. The. Air.

Simple stuff. Easy peazy lemon squeazies.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

I thought we were talking about the distance the ball travels in the air? You bring up tight windows into it and act like I'm the one not comprehending things here. Brilliant!



Repeating myself: The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Please note, I have not added the extra variables (e.g. coverage, pass rush, etc) to this and have been talking merely about the pass itself, specifically ... The. Distance. The. Ball. Travels. Through. The. Air.

Simple stuff. Easy peazy lemon squeazies.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



You should read the entire posts instead of picking and choosing which parts you want to pay attention to. You might be able to comprehend better. My first post clearly stated 5 yard slant between 3 defenders is more difficult than a 30 yard pass to a wide open WR.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

You should read the entire posts instead of picking and choosing which parts you want to pay attention to. You might be able to comprehend better. My first post clearly stated 5 yard slant between 3 defenders is more difficult than a 30 yard pass to a wide open WR.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Clearly, it does state that.
Clearly, I was focusing on distance the ball travels in the air.
Clearly, you can't understand.
Clearly, I cannot understand.
Clearly, we have both spent too much time on something we both probably agree on, lol.

Passing the ball 5 yards is less difficult than passing it 30 yards. Agreed.
Passing the ball 5 yards slant between 3 defenders is more difficult than a 30 yard pass to a wide open WR. Agreed.





UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (3h) : HUMP DAY
beast (3h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (3h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (4h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (4h) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (4h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (4h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (4h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (4h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (4h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (6h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (6h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (6h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (6h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (6h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (6h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (19h) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17h / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.