PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago
Talking like the distance a pass travels makes it more or less difficult is ignorance. Hitting a 5 yard slant between 3 defenders is much more difficult than throwing a 30 yards pass to a wide open WR.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Thinking a five yard slant is more difficult than completing a pass 30 yards in the National Football League (not Madden, put down the controller) is massively ignorant on levels that cannot be quantified.


BTW, the NFL thinks the performance was, umm, average, too. haha
Aaron Rodgers named NFC offensive player of the week for 13th time
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

Thinking a five yard slant is more difficult than completing a pass 30 yards in the National Football League (not Madden, put down the controller) is massively ignorant on levels that cannot be quantified.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



sorry but try reading what I stated again. It depends on the pass. I can throw 30 yards to a wide open WR, I can't throw a 5 yard slant between 3 defenders. distance of the pass has little to do with whether it is a difficult throw or not.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

sorry but try reading what I stated again. It depends on the pass. I can throw 30 yards to a wide open WR, I can't throw a 5 yard slant between 3 defenders. distance of the pass has little to do with whether it is a difficult throw or not.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



So you claim I am not reading what you're stating when evidently you're not even trying to understand what I have stated a few times? Fascinating.

As for distance having little to do with a throw being difficult or not, you are not correct with your opinion.

The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Aaron Rodgers played a smart game throwing it to the SHORT (less than 9 yards downfield) and OPEN receivers and amassed good SUM statistics.

I think most of us look at the SUM of the statistics (24 of 35 333 yards 5TD 0INT) and go WHOA he smoked them!! I wouldn't disagree, nor would anyone. HOWEVER, when you dig deeper and analyze play-by-play on how those statistics were accrued, you realize the numbers weren't as WHOA as the SUM leads us to believe.

ProFootballFocus believes if the quarterback throws an incomplete when there was a receiver they determine was in the line of sight of the quarterback, they earn a negative grade for that play.

This is the kind of in-depth thinking and analysis I don't believe many are doing. Who the hell wants to do that anyway? lol (oh yeah, me haha)
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago
You do what you gotta do to win. Clearly, the coaching staff expected the Chief pass rush to be better than our O Line, so they game-planned accordingly. Rodgers took what was available; It was plenty to dominate the game (other than some meaningless crap at the end). Not all stats are crap, but the ones that go into what was discussed at the start of this thread indeed are crap.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

So you claim I am not reading what you're stating when evidently you're not even trying to understand what I have stated a few times? Fascinating.

As for distance having little to do with a throw being difficult or not, you are not correct with your opinion.

The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



If you are reading than it is a comprehension issue. and I am 100% correct. a 5 yard slant into a tight window is far more difficult than a 30 yard throw to a receiver that is wide open. If that 30 yard pass is also into a tight window than yes that throw then becomes more difficult.

Another example is that same 5 yard slant and a bubble screen. on the slant the ball might only travel 8 -10 yards through the air, while on the screen the ball can actually travel up to 20 yards depending on where on the field the WR and QB are.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
steveishere
9 years ago


I think most of us look at the SUM of the statistics (24 of 35 333 yards 5TD 0INT) and go WHOA he smoked them!! I wouldn't disagree, nor would anyone. HOWEVER, when you dig deeper and analyze play-by-play on how those statistics were accrued, you realize the numbers weren't as WHOA as the SUM leads us to believe.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



No, I think most of us just watched him play the game and thought that. Rodgers spent all game easily avoiding pressure from their great rushers and doing whatever he wanted. It was a masterful performance. I think most peoples problem is with the fact that a fumble that didn't count and an "almost interception" by a guy who had to jump in the air and got 1 hand on the ball somehow completely overshadows Rodgers dissecting that defense for 4 quarters. Forget the 5 TDs, KC had no answer for him.

I agree with what I think it was Barfan said in that this game by Rodgers exposes a flaw in the grading system where they either could not quantify something important that was happening on the field or something was off in how much weight they put into the negative plays. They had this graded as Rodgers' 3rd worst game since 2011... I have a lot of trouble seeing any way I could believe that was one of his worst games even if he only had 2 TDs and had handed off to Lacy the 3 other times.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

If you are reading than it is a comprehension issue. and I am 100% correct. a 5 yard slant into a tight window is far more difficult than a 30 yard throw to a receiver that is wide open. If that 30 yard pass is also into a tight window than yes that throw then becomes more difficult.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


I thought we were talking about the distance the ball travels in the air? You bring up tight windows into it and act like I'm the one not comprehending things here. Brilliant!

Talking like the distance a pass travels makes it more or less difficult is ignorance.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


distance of the pass has little to do with whether it is a difficult throw or not.

PackFanWithTwins wrote:


Repeating myself: The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Please note, I have not added the extra variables (e.g. coverage, pass rush, etc) to this and have been talking merely about the pass itself, specifically ... The. Distance. The. Ball. Travels. Through. The. Air.

Simple stuff. Easy peazy lemon squeazies.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

I thought we were talking about the distance the ball travels in the air? You bring up tight windows into it and act like I'm the one not comprehending things here. Brilliant!



Repeating myself: The greater the distance, the greater the difficulty. The greater the distance, the more you need to plant your feet better and more you need to step into the throw and also the longer the ball is in the air giving defenders and opportunity to deflect the pass. Try throwing a pass while kneeling that goes five yards and another that goes 30 yards.

Please note, I have not added the extra variables (e.g. coverage, pass rush, etc) to this and have been talking merely about the pass itself, specifically ... The. Distance. The. Ball. Travels. Through. The. Air.

Simple stuff. Easy peazy lemon squeazies.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



You should read the entire posts instead of picking and choosing which parts you want to pay attention to. You might be able to comprehend better. My first post clearly stated 5 yard slant between 3 defenders is more difficult than a 30 yard pass to a wide open WR.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

You should read the entire posts instead of picking and choosing which parts you want to pay attention to. You might be able to comprehend better. My first post clearly stated 5 yard slant between 3 defenders is more difficult than a 30 yard pass to a wide open WR.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Clearly, it does state that.
Clearly, I was focusing on distance the ball travels in the air.
Clearly, you can't understand.
Clearly, I cannot understand.
Clearly, we have both spent too much time on something we both probably agree on, lol.

Passing the ball 5 yards is less difficult than passing it 30 yards. Agreed.
Passing the ball 5 yards slant between 3 defenders is more difficult than a 30 yard pass to a wide open WR. Agreed.





UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
buckeyepackfan (9m) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (10m) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (11m) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (13m) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (15m) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (18m) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (8h) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (10h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (11h) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (12h) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (12h) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (12h) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (18h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (23h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (23h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (23h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (23-Apr) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

11h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.