greengold
9 years ago
Maybe Crockett makes the team and Harris goes on IR??
DakotaT
9 years ago

Who's happy?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Have nothing invested in Myles White, so whatever! It's better than bringing back a player we let walk two years ago, and he's done nadda since leaving the greatest quarterback in the universe. Hope he didn't spend all his Raider money.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
9 years ago
Who's the third TE?
UserPostedImage
greengold
9 years ago

Who's the third TE?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Backman

beast
9 years ago

Who's the third TE?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



The draft pick... TE Backman ... though I'm thinking FB Rip could be getting the 3rd TE reps on STs and Backman might just be depth / future potential.

#Packers cut WR Jared Abbrederis, RB John Crockett, CB Tay Glover-Wright. OLB Jermauria Rasco was waived injured.

https://twitter.com/ByRyanWood/status/640291347535134720 
UserPostedImage
steveishere
9 years ago
Still 1 more to be cut after Chicago. Ringo kind of a surprise to me I thought he looked pretty good. Hope he makes it through waivers
Barfarn
9 years ago

Damn. Why would they waive Pinkard injured instead of putting him on IR?

Reminds me of the Charles Johnson fiasco.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



If Pinkard is injured in camp and placed on IR, his 435K salary is guaranteed paid for the year [unless it’s a split contract], he can’t practice all year and this as an accrued season for min salaries and free agency vesting.

If Pinkard is waived injured, GB cant sign him again until after the injury is healed plus 6 weeks. EG, If Pinkard and GB agreed his injury requires 4 weeks to heal, then GB can sign him [probably to PS] in week 10. They only have to pay 6.3K per week salary. This gives him an opportunity to practice for 6 weeks during season and 4 more weeks in playoffs and it doesn’t count as an accrued year. And if player is on PS for less than 6 weeks it does not count as a year of PS eligibility. So in this example Pinkard might not be resigned until week 11.

I don’t think it’s risky because no one is signing Pinkard to their 53, let alone an injured Pinkard and Johnson was cut because he wasn't going to get our system. Minny dumbed down their offense for Bridgewater and Johnson benefited; regardless of what Johnson does in Minny, he would not have done that in GB.
steveishere
9 years ago

Have nothing invested in Myles White, so whatever! It's better than bringing back a player we let walk two years ago, and he's done nadda since leaving the greatest quarterback in the universe. Hope he didn't spend all his Raider money.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Isn't that exactly what it is?
nerdmann
9 years ago

Isn't that exactly what it is?

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



We won't be paying him what he wanted two years ago. Not to mention, Jordy wasn't out for the season two years ago.

However any moves on Jones remain to be seen.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago

If Pinkard is injured in camp and placed on IR, his 435K salary is guaranteed paid for the year [unless it’s a split contract], he can’t practice all year and this as an accrued season for min salaries and free agency vesting.

If Pinkard is waived injured, GB cant sign him again until after the injury is healed plus 6 weeks. EG, If Pinkard and GB agreed his injury requires 4 weeks to heal, then GB can sign him [probably to PS] in week 10. They only have to pay 6.3K per week salary. This gives him an opportunity to practice for 6 weeks during season and 4 more weeks in playoffs and it doesn’t count as an accrued year. And if player is on PS for less than 6 weeks it does not count as a year of PS eligibility. So in this example Pinkard might not be resigned until week 11.

I don’t think it’s risky because no one is signing Pinkard to their 53, let alone an injured Pinkard and Johnson was cut because he wasn't going to get our system. Minny dumbed down their offense for Bridgewater and Johnson benefited; regardless of what Johnson does in Minny, he would not have done that in GB.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



A bunch of excuses for a bad decision. During that injury plus 6 weeks, it's my understanding anybody can sign him, and undoubtedly we will lose a good player - for what? to keep a piece of crap 9th O Lineman? to keep Nick Perry?

Thomas, Vaughters, Neal, Crockett, and probably others cut and likely not to be kept on the practice squad in order to retain worse players.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (11m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (57m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (57m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (57m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.