nerdmann
9 years ago

The Packers have drafted nine receivers since Rodgers' ascension to starter in 2008, the seventh-highest total in the NFL, but never have they sought a dominant No. 1 receiver such as Dez Bryant. Instead, they have collected upper-end volume -- Nelson, Cobb and Adams were all second-round picks -- to build their scheme and financial structure around the idea that a high-level whole will prove better than any one part.

Rob Demovsky  wrote:



It's becoming a proven system.

Adams is gonna be elite.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

It's becoming a proven system.

Adams is gonna be elite.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



The article just spoke to not drafting elite WR's and the first comment below is Adams who is the worst of the big 3 is going to be elite.

I really don't understand sometimes.

For me, I'll take a Dez Bryant type talent, not character, over what we have and fill in players around him. It makes no sense not to. We wouldn't go with a 2nd tier QB if we could...we're what we are because we have the best of the best at QB and that should be the idea at all positions.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


musccy
9 years ago

The article just spoke to not drafting elite WR's and the first comment below is Adams who is the worst of the big 3 is going to be elite.

I really don't understand sometimes.

For me, I'll take a Dez Bryant type talent, not character, over what we have and fill in players around him. It makes no sense not to. We wouldn't go with a 2nd tier QB if we could...we're what we are because we have the best of the best at QB and that should be the idea at all positions.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You need an elite QB to win a SB much more than you need an elite wr. The last 2 SB champs illustrate that.

Of course Megatron would be nice, but I'd put an elite QB, LT, CB all above WR on a priorities list.
nerdmann
9 years ago

You need an elite QB to win a SB much more than you need an elite wr. The last 2 SB champs illustrate that.

Of course Megatron would be nice, but I'd put an elite QB, LT, CB all above WR on a priorities list.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I'll take 2 or 3 very good guys over 1 "elite" guy every time.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I'll take 2 or 3 very good guys over 1 "elite" guy every time.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.






UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Bigbyfan
9 years ago

...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.





Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.
blank
musccy
9 years ago

...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



It's a capped league. There are other roster spots. You're not going to be elite at all 24 positions on the field. If you're pretty darn good at most positions, with some elite sprinkled in then you're doing well. If this was baseball, and you're the Dodgers, fine, shoot for a HoFer at each position.

An elite WR isn't necessarily bad, but it doesn't need to be a top priority on a roster, and having 3-4 very good WRs is arguably a better alternative.
nerdmann
9 years ago

There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



Keep in mind, Uffda's definition of "elite" includes Jeff Janis.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
9 years ago

Keep in mind, Uffda's definition of "elite" includes Jeff Janis.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I don't often actually chuckle out loud - but this made me do just that. 👍
uffda udfa
9 years ago

There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



You make my case even stronger. What would we do if we committed that kind of space? Draft guys like Cobb and Nelson and not resign them and keep the pipeline full behind them. I still fail to see why you wouldn't want an elite WR? You want an elite QB, don't you? Oh, but that's different? It's hilarious how fiscally tight members here come when it comes to debating against our org's philosophy. It's mindboggling. You want the BEST possible player you can have. You want FOUR or FIVE elite WR's, if possible.

So, you guys are hoping Randall and Rollins are just good players not elite because it might cost too much to keep them if they're both phenomenal? The logic is stupefying. Honestly, I do think the Packers company line has done things to rational thinking people. I truly do.

I hope each and every draftee in this class and future class turns into a HOF player. I hope each one is so good that they command so much cap that we're getting comp picks like you wouldn't believe because we can't possibly keep them all.

James Jones. Ring a bell? He was merely a "good" WR from our group of non-elite WR's...did we keep him? Nope. We're going to have to let guys go whether they're stars, good, mediocre, or terrible. Give me ELITE.

Go back and read these posts and ask yourself if it makes any sense not to want as many elite players as you possibly can have at any position.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (2h) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (2h) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (2h) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (2h) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (2h) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (3h) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (3h) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (3h) : *Friday*
dfosterf (3h) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (3h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (4h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (4h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (4h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (4h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (4h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (4h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (4h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (4h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (4h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (4h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (5h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (5h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (5h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (11h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.