uffda udfa
10 years ago

Dude quit trying to skin it

You NEVER read the article till yesterday.

You are what I said you were a year ago.

ONE TRICK PONY!

E end the most casual football fan knows pro bowl election has no relevance,
The author clearly stated he was just coming from a different perspective.

Stay with the agenda one trick, as the NFL goes, sooner or later everyone retires or gets fired.

Maybe you will be right in another 5 years.

Until then it Will be entertaining to see how many ways you can come up with to try and maker your mootless point..

Ted Thompson is one of the best.

If he wasn't he would have been ran out of Green Bay years ago.

Can't wait for Ted to make you look the fool during the draft.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.







UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.






Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If you were a fish,
You would be stuffed and Hangin g on my trophy wall right now!

HOOK,LINE AND SINKER!

😄😄😄😄😄😄



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DakotaT
10 years ago
I hate to interrupt all this sexual tensions between Uffda and Uncle Buck; but until Ted Thompson actually builds a defense, we're still the same team as the Sherman Packers, that went on one hell of a run in 2010.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I didn't say Ted Thompson coaches the defense, I said he needs to build a defense. And that means providing the correct players for Dom's 3-4. That means you don't draft 4-3 defensive ends to play OLB, or draft defensive tackles to play DE.

But thanks just the same for the snarky comment. You know I just thrive on that stuff.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
10 years ago

I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think Ted Thompson is a good General Manager, as do the majority of folks around the league, but I've wanted Dom Capers gone for several years now. He isn't a horrible coach, but he definitely isn't a great coach. He's average, at best. How much talent does the guy need to field an above average defense? He has had enough talent for an above average defense at least, perhaps not much more than that.

I'm also not sure what took so long to get rid of Slocum. I wish there was more prompt accountability.
greengold
10 years ago

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.






uffda udfa
10 years ago

Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.

Originally Posted by: greengold 



I'm still rejoicing. Usually, when you waive players who have been starters you have another guy ready to go in his place. Do we? I don't think so. As I said, previously, this approach has been taken because there is "nothing to lose"...we can't be any worse with the players we'll trot out in replacement especially in Hawk's case.

We know Ted Thompson isn't signing a FA... so, what does that mean? Yup. Gulp. Here we go again heading into a season with no clue who is going to play some key positions for us. Let's just throw a draft choice out there or a UDFA or a guy from the IFL. That'll do.

Yes, it will be TT's fault. Who else's? The credit never seems to stop for what exactly I don't know. Winning division championships with one of the greatest QB's of all time? Wow.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


greengold
10 years ago
On THIS planet there isn't a single team that wins the Superbowl every year.

Patriots, Seahawks, Packers have approximately the same odds of winning it this coming year. 10-20% is the best chance any team has to do it. That means there is an 80-90% chance they WON'T win the superbowl.

So anyone can troll any fan forum with [fill in the (____) as applicable]

"(Belichick) SUCKS! (Tom Brady) is the BEST (QB) to ever play the position! Yet only ONE superbowl championship in the last (ten) years! Wow, just wow. I guess we are supposed to be happy with division championships. It's already April 3 and we don't know who our starting (CB) is yet. He let (Revis) go and doesn't have another starter in place already. Wait and see, this will be another year of make the playoffs and see what happens. Another wasted year. You koolaid drinking morons just can't see it."

It doesn't have to make any sense. The beauty of it is there is at least an 80-90% chance you will be "proven" right at the end of the year. "Yet another year without a superbowl win. See, that (Belichick) really does suck. He should fire his head coach." :cussing:


Fan Shout
dfosterf (9h) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (9h) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (20h) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (23h) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.