On THIS planet there isn't a single team that wins the Superbowl every year.

Patriots, Seahawks, Packers have approximately the same odds of winning it this coming year. 10-20% is the best chance any team has to do it. That means there is an 80-90% chance they WON'T win the superbowl.

So anyone can troll any fan forum with [fill in the (____) as applicable]

"(Belichick) SUCKS! (Tom Brady) is the BEST (QB) to ever play the position! Yet only ONE superbowl championship in the last (ten) years! Wow, just wow. I guess we are supposed to be happy with division championships. It's already April 3 and we don't know who our starting (CB) is yet. He let (Revis) go and doesn't have another starter in place already. Wait and see, this will be another year of make the playoffs and see what happens. Another wasted year. You koolaid drinking morons just can't see it."

It doesn't have to make any sense. The beauty of it is there is at least an 80-90% chance you will be "proven" right at the end of the year. "Yet another year without a superbowl win. See, that (Belichick) really does suck. He should fire his head coach." :cussing:

Originally Posted by: greengold 

That's cute. Brady has SIX SB appearances. How many does Rodgers have?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

This is where you turn it around and redefine what is important. Say something like:

"Superbowl APPEARANCES? Is that a polite term for Playoff LOSSES? Like Jim Kelly Superbowl APPEARANCES?? That is NOT the measure of a true winner. Championships are...not divisional...not conference...WORLD....it is about WORLD Championships. We have possibly the best ever to play the most critical position that helps you achieve WORLD Champion status and we've done it ...ONCE in the LAST 10 YEARS? FAILURE, FAILURE, FAILURE. No other way about it. Our team is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. "

Remember, there is about 85% chance I will be "proven" right at the end of the year. End with a jab at another team to gain support:

"Even that no-talent assclown Thompson in Green Bay has a single WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP in the last 10 years. Just pitiful."

Originally Posted by: greengold 

This is where you turn it around and redefine what is important. Say something like:

"Superbowl APPEARANCES? Is that a polite term for Playoff LOSSES? Like Jim Kelly Superbowl APPEARANCES?? That is NOT the measure of a true winner. Championships are...not divisional...not conference...WORLD....it is about WORLD Championships. We have possibly the best ever to play the most critical position that helps you achieve WORLD Champion status and we've done it ...ONCE in the LAST 10 YEARS? FAILURE, FAILURE, FAILURE. No other way about it. Our team is NOT GOOD ENOUGH. "

Remember, there is about 85% chance I will be "proven" right at the end of the year. End with a jab at another team to gain support:

"Even that no-talent assclown Thompson in Green Bay has a single WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP in the last 10 years. Just pitiful."

Originally Posted by: greengold 

Your last two lines are perfect.

How many RINGS does Brady have? Ben Roethlisberger? Eli Manning?

Those ORGANIZATIONS have won more championships. Better TEAMS. Who builds TEAMS? That is the GM. We have less championships so our guy isn't as good, or do you dispute that logic? It gets compounded by the fact that Aaron Rodgers is light years better than Ben Roethlisberger and Eli Manning but Ben and Eli's TEAMS have MORE championships. How is that possible? Ask TT. He has FAILED. Imagine what Pittsburgh or NYG would do if they had Aaron Rodgers... they won with much lesser QB's.

I'm not sure why reality is such a hard concept for so many. There is NOTHING to refute the above. Nothing.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Your last two lines are perfect.

How many RINGS does Brady have? Ben Roethlisberger? Eli Manning?

Those ORGANIZATIONS have won more championships. Better TEAMS. Who builds TEAMS? That is the GM. We have less championships so our guy isn't as good, or do you dispute that logic? It gets compounded by the fact that Aaron Rodgers is light years better than Ben Roethlisberger and Eli Manning but Ben and Eli's TEAMS have MORE championships. How is that possible? Ask TT. He has FAILED. Imagine what Pittsburgh or NYG would do if they had Aaron Rodgers... they won with much lesser QB's.

I'm not sure why reality is such a hard concept for so many. There is NOTHING to refute the above. Nothing.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Our crappy team beat the better SB champs during the season. The better Giants who go from almost firing their HC every few years because of how bad the team is.

Each of those teams have a few players that are better than our, and they also all have players that are worse than other of our players. Winning a SB doesn't mean they were the better team. Our SB winning season was one that because of injury was one of our weakest teams, but circumstances worked out for us.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

What team was it that The 2010 Packers beat in the SB?

Pretty sure Seattle was favored over New England last year.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

You just keep doing Buck...

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/2/1/7959857/2015-superbowl-odds-point-spread-patriots-favorites-seahawks 

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa