uffda udfa
10 years ago

Dude quit trying to skin it

You NEVER read the article till yesterday.

You are what I said you were a year ago.

ONE TRICK PONY!

E end the most casual football fan knows pro bowl election has no relevance,
The author clearly stated he was just coming from a different perspective.

Stay with the agenda one trick, as the NFL goes, sooner or later everyone retires or gets fired.

Maybe you will be right in another 5 years.

Until then it Will be entertaining to see how many ways you can come up with to try and maker your mootless point..

Ted Thompson is one of the best.

If he wasn't he would have been ran out of Green Bay years ago.

Can't wait for Ted to make you look the fool during the draft.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.







UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
10 years ago

One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.






Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If you were a fish,
You would be stuffed and Hangin g on my trophy wall right now!

HOOK,LINE AND SINKER!

😄😄😄😄😄😄



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DakotaT
10 years ago
I hate to interrupt all this sexual tensions between Uffda and Uncle Buck; but until Ted Thompson actually builds a defense, we're still the same team as the Sherman Packers, that went on one hell of a run in 2010.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I didn't say Ted Thompson coaches the defense, I said he needs to build a defense. And that means providing the correct players for Dom's 3-4. That means you don't draft 4-3 defensive ends to play OLB, or draft defensive tackles to play DE.

But thanks just the same for the snarky comment. You know I just thrive on that stuff.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
10 years ago

I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think Ted Thompson is a good General Manager, as do the majority of folks around the league, but I've wanted Dom Capers gone for several years now. He isn't a horrible coach, but he definitely isn't a great coach. He's average, at best. How much talent does the guy need to field an above average defense? He has had enough talent for an above average defense at least, perhaps not much more than that.

I'm also not sure what took so long to get rid of Slocum. I wish there was more prompt accountability.
greengold
10 years ago

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.






uffda udfa
10 years ago

Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.

Originally Posted by: greengold 



I'm still rejoicing. Usually, when you waive players who have been starters you have another guy ready to go in his place. Do we? I don't think so. As I said, previously, this approach has been taken because there is "nothing to lose"...we can't be any worse with the players we'll trot out in replacement especially in Hawk's case.

We know Ted Thompson isn't signing a FA... so, what does that mean? Yup. Gulp. Here we go again heading into a season with no clue who is going to play some key positions for us. Let's just throw a draft choice out there or a UDFA or a guy from the IFL. That'll do.

Yes, it will be TT's fault. Who else's? The credit never seems to stop for what exactly I don't know. Winning division championships with one of the greatest QB's of all time? Wow.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


greengold
10 years ago
On THIS planet there isn't a single team that wins the Superbowl every year.

Patriots, Seahawks, Packers have approximately the same odds of winning it this coming year. 10-20% is the best chance any team has to do it. That means there is an 80-90% chance they WON'T win the superbowl.

So anyone can troll any fan forum with [fill in the (____) as applicable]

"(Belichick) SUCKS! (Tom Brady) is the BEST (QB) to ever play the position! Yet only ONE superbowl championship in the last (ten) years! Wow, just wow. I guess we are supposed to be happy with division championships. It's already April 3 and we don't know who our starting (CB) is yet. He let (Revis) go and doesn't have another starter in place already. Wait and see, this will be another year of make the playoffs and see what happens. Another wasted year. You koolaid drinking morons just can't see it."

It doesn't have to make any sense. The beauty of it is there is at least an 80-90% chance you will be "proven" right at the end of the year. "Yet another year without a superbowl win. See, that (Belichick) really does suck. He should fire his head coach." :cussing:


Fan Shout
dfosterf (1h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (1h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (1h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (8h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (10h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (10h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (11h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (12h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.