Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Dude quit trying to skin it

You NEVER read the article till yesterday.

You are what I said you were a year ago.

ONE TRICK PONY!

E end the most casual football fan knows pro bowl election has no relevance,
The author clearly stated he was just coming from a different perspective.

Stay with the agenda one trick, as the NFL goes, sooner or later everyone retires or gets fired.

Maybe you will be right in another 5 years.

Until then it Will be entertaining to see how many ways you can come up with to try and maker your mootless point..

Ted Thompson is one of the best.

If he wasn't he would have been ran out of Green Bay years ago.

Can't wait for Ted to make you look the fool during the draft.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.







UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

One trick pony? Oh. Right.

How do you explain the 6 year run of Mike Sherman? He had a 57-39 record. Why was he let go? Why? Ted Thompson came in and made it impossible for him to win his final season. If only we had a president who had the balls to do to Ted Thompson what Ted Thompson did to Sherman could we see this organization soar. Nope. Status quo. Let's try to win divisions and see what happens.

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Oh, and BTW...I usually will not read articles from sites like "Lombardi Ave.".... what they have to say is usually completely irrelevant but you should know that from your stalkeration of me.

How's the D, Buck? Will or can you answer? Who is responsible, Buck? Will you answer? Nope...if you want to talk one trickers grab some mirror. Insults are your only weapon.






Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



If you were a fish,
You would be stuffed and Hangin g on my trophy wall right now!

HOOK,LINE AND SINKER!

😄😄😄😄😄😄



I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DakotaT
9 years ago
I hate to interrupt all this sexual tensions between Uffda and Uncle Buck; but until Ted Thompson actually builds a defense, we're still the same team as the Sherman Packers, that went on one hell of a run in 2010.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
9 years ago

Ted Thompson doesn't coach the defense, that is Dom Capers. Now that you know this, perhaps you can focus back on Ted Thompson as the subject of this topic.

Thompson routinely is getting talented players, but if the coaching staff is failing to coach them up, that is not on Thompson as much as it is the coaching staff.

There is a reason why other teams have been plucking people whom worked under Thompson after all. Some of you should really put some common sense thought into that fact.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I didn't say Ted Thompson coaches the defense, I said he needs to build a defense. And that means providing the correct players for Dom's 3-4. That means you don't draft 4-3 defensive ends to play OLB, or draft defensive tackles to play DE.

But thanks just the same for the snarky comment. You know I just thrive on that stuff.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago

I did like Dakota's sexual tension reference...as you can clearly see, Buck wants to "mount me".

Z...the charge that it's Dom's fault the D isn't good has been addressed again and again in my posts on this subject.

Again, it's clear that Ted Thompson is fine with the direction of the team, including the D...that was proven when he extended MM. If Ted Thompson was unhappy with the direction of this team, he could've cut bait on MM...he chose to extend which is an indictment on Ted Thompson for believing things are just fine when we all know they aren't.



Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I think Ted Thompson is a good General Manager, as do the majority of folks around the league, but I've wanted Dom Capers gone for several years now. He isn't a horrible coach, but he definitely isn't a great coach. He's average, at best. How much talent does the guy need to field an above average defense? He has had enough talent for an above average defense at least, perhaps not much more than that.

I'm also not sure what took so long to get rid of Slocum. I wish there was more prompt accountability.
greengold
9 years ago

I'm right right now...not 5 years from now. You have no foresight. None. Who are our starting ILB's? Our CB's? On a defense that isn't very good to begin with you can't even answer those questions today. Sounds like a recipe for success, again, on D, doesn't it? Just screams success to me. What it tells me is that we can't possibly be worse so winging it like this is acceptable. TT's "master plan"...might have been the funniest thing you've ever said.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.






uffda udfa
9 years ago

Two weeks ago you were "rejoicing" that Williams and Hawk (and Jones) were gone. Now it's the end of the world that 2 starters are gone from a "HORRIBLE, so horrible" defense? A 32 year old CB and a 31 year old ILB...

Last I checked there weren't any games on the schedule for almost 6 months. Also pretty sure that the roster goes up to 90 players and back down to 53 between now and then. But I'll give it a shot.

CB: Shields and Hayward (or someone else.)
ILB: Barrington and someone else.


Also, if Shields or Barrington get hurt, someone else will start in their place. And the defense will be better or worse than it was last year. And it will be Ted Thompson 's fault.

Originally Posted by: greengold 



I'm still rejoicing. Usually, when you waive players who have been starters you have another guy ready to go in his place. Do we? I don't think so. As I said, previously, this approach has been taken because there is "nothing to lose"...we can't be any worse with the players we'll trot out in replacement especially in Hawk's case.

We know Ted Thompson isn't signing a FA... so, what does that mean? Yup. Gulp. Here we go again heading into a season with no clue who is going to play some key positions for us. Let's just throw a draft choice out there or a UDFA or a guy from the IFL. That'll do.

Yes, it will be TT's fault. Who else's? The credit never seems to stop for what exactly I don't know. Winning division championships with one of the greatest QB's of all time? Wow.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


greengold
9 years ago
On THIS planet there isn't a single team that wins the Superbowl every year.

Patriots, Seahawks, Packers have approximately the same odds of winning it this coming year. 10-20% is the best chance any team has to do it. That means there is an 80-90% chance they WON'T win the superbowl.

So anyone can troll any fan forum with [fill in the (____) as applicable]

"(Belichick) SUCKS! (Tom Brady) is the BEST (QB) to ever play the position! Yet only ONE superbowl championship in the last (ten) years! Wow, just wow. I guess we are supposed to be happy with division championships. It's already April 3 and we don't know who our starting (CB) is yet. He let (Revis) go and doesn't have another starter in place already. Wait and see, this will be another year of make the playoffs and see what happens. Another wasted year. You koolaid drinking morons just can't see it."

It doesn't have to make any sense. The beauty of it is there is at least an 80-90% chance you will be "proven" right at the end of the year. "Yet another year without a superbowl win. See, that (Belichick) really does suck. He should fire his head coach." :cussing:


Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (58m) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (8h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (12h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (12h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (12h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (12h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (12h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (12h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (12h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (13h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (14h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (14h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (16h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (27-Dec) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

11h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

20h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.