nerdmann
10 years ago

Lots of questions on the tight end situation, and they're certainly valid. Last year, Andrew Quarless and Richard Rodgers combined for 49 catches, 548 yards and five touchdowns in the regular season. That's right, I said combined. That total couldn't match what Jermichael Finley gave them in his best seasons. At this point, with five NFL seasons to his credit, it's fairly clear what Quarless is. To expect him to make the jump to a 50-catch guy would be unrealistic. But the sense is they think Rodgers can become that. How certain they are about that will dictate how high they need to address the position in the draft.

Rob Demovsky  wrote:

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
steveishere
10 years ago
While we don't have great looking TEs I would still put it pretty far down the list. Improving that position seems like more of a luxury thing.
+1
uffda udfa
10 years ago

While we don't have great looking TEs I would still put it pretty far down the list. Improving that position seems like more of a luxury thing.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



I put this as one of our top priorities. Against Seattle we need as many threats as we can vs. their secondary. Getting little to nothing from the TE position is not cutting it when Randall and Jordy aren't all that hard to shut down for that secondary.

Seattle got my guy. We shall see how that plays.

It appears that Ted Thompson does think RR is something. I don't know how to gauge that. Finley appeared to be nothing in the beginning but exploded in Arizona. RR's hands have been talked about and sure looked better than what we've seen from that position for awhile.

No Jordan Cameron, no offer to Charles Clay... RR is our guy for better or worse. A. Rodgers loved him in OTA's.




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
10 years ago

I put this as one of our top priorities. Against Seattle we need as many threats as we can vs. their secondary. Getting little to nothing from the TE position is not cutting it when Randall and Jordy aren't all that hard to shut down for that secondary.

Seattle got my guy. We shall see how that plays.

It appears that Ted Thompson does think RR is something. I don't know how to gauge that. Finley appeared to be nothing in the beginning but exploded in Arizona. RR's hands have been talked about and sure looked better than what we've seen from that position for awhile.

No Jordan Cameron, no offer to Charles Clay... RR is our guy for better or worse. A. Rodgers loved him in OTA's.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Against Seattle we need to not shit ourselves.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
+1
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
lol @ uffda udfa that avatar is just wrong man, so wrong lol

"He's got incredible hands; I dare say the best hands on the team. He went through a stretch in training camp where he didn't drop a pass. Yeah, he's an exceptional player with great potential for us." is what Aaron Rodgers said about TE Richard Rodgers. I think of that endorsement when I see people frantically worrying about the TE position.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
10 years ago

I put this as one of our top priorities. Against Seattle we need as many threats as we can vs. their secondary. Getting little to nothing from the TE position is not cutting it when Randall and Jordy aren't all that hard to shut down for that secondary.

Seattle got my guy. We shall see how that plays.

It appears that Ted Thompson does think RR is something. I don't know how to gauge that. Finley appeared to be nothing in the beginning but exploded in Arizona. RR's hands have been talked about and sure looked better than what we've seen from that position for awhile.

No Jordan Cameron, no offer to Charles Clay... RR is our guy for better or worse. A. Rodgers loved him in OTA's.




Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



The thing with RR is it looks like he can make contested catches because he's got such strong hands (a good skill in the red zone where getting much separation isn't as likely). I don't think he'll be a game breaker type but I think he could be kind of like a past his prime Atlanta version of Tony Gonzalez who was still a good player.
Smokey
10 years ago
Unnecessary thread, focus on the real needs instead of luxury fantasies . Defense is the #1 priority need, if you can't see that, then you need ease off on the partying and join the rest of the non-zombie Packer Nation .


Go Pack Go !
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

Unnecessary thread, focus on the real needs instead of luxury fantasies . Defense is the #1 priority need, if you can't see that, then you need ease off on the partying and join the rest of the non-zombie Packer Nation .


Go Pack Go !

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



When you're right, you're right.

I do not want another Jermichael Finley type TE. I'd much rather have extra WRs on the field in passing situations and for deep throws. Give me good possession receiver type TEs - which both Rodgers and Quarless are - who can also block decently, and that's better. Since Bostick is gone, we probably do need a TE somewhere in the draft or UDFA, either that or for that kid Perillo to step up, but I really don't think replacing Rodgers or Quarless is a good idea, much less a priority.

And yeah, D is the better choice for the high rounds of the draft - other than the slim chance of getting Melvin Gordon, of course.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
+1
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Unnecessary thread, focus on the real needs instead of luxury fantasies . Defense is the #1 priority need, if you can't see that, then you need ease off on the partying and join the rest of the non-zombie Packer Nation .


Go Pack Go !

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



A thread is often an opinion of someone or a thought and both of which are very much welcomed here. That said, I agree, defense is a bigger priority than tight end and I wouldn't be surprised if the originally poster agrees. But crap man, it's the off season, we don't have games to over analyze so we roll with this. 🙂
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
10 years ago
C'mon, if Maxx Williams is there draft his ass!!!
+1
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
    wpr (4h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
    wpr (4h) : now 3
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Who? What?
    beast (14h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
    Martha Careful (18h) : meh
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
    Zero2Cool (22h) : It's so awesome.
    Zero2Cool (22h) : new site fan shout post fast
    wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
    dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
    wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
    beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.