Zero2Cool
9 years ago
The Chicago Bears reportedly want to trade WR Brandon Marshall and it got me imagining having WR Jordy Nelson opposite Marshall.

Contract Details
2015: $7.5 million,
2016: $7.9 million,
2017: $8.3 million,
2018: Free Agent

What reasonable offer would you give the Bears to acquire Marshall? I think I'd want to rework his contract to be more incentive based, although, I prefer that with every player so that's not saying much.



And there's this...

UserPostedImage
QCHuskerFan
9 years ago
AJ Hawk or Brad Jones. Might even package them!

BJ Raji

Marshall Newhouse

Brandon Bostick


BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
lolleren
9 years ago
I would wait for Bears to cut him, looking at his contract they might do so before the 12th of March.
If he does not get cut I would not be intrested.

If he does get cut, I would however be very intrested to the tune of 5-7m a year, depending on the length of the contract.
blank
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago
Considering the report that says there are only 22 players rated as 1st rnd players, I would offer them our 1st and 4th for Marshall and The Bears 3rd .
I've read where the value picks are in the 2nd and 3rd rnds this year.
Let Cobb go and watch Jordy excel in the slot.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Yerko
9 years ago
It wouldn't be the money that bothered me about this but the absolute cancer this guy is to a locker room. Living in Chicago, aside from Jay Cutler, all I ever hear about in Chicago media during the NFL season is how awful Marshall was to teammates in the locker room.

I don't buy his whole renewed image. He's a diva and when things don't go his way, he gets pissed off and doesn't play. Name a player on the Packers offense that currently does that. If we are going to talk about going after a veteran WR (which Ted Thompson has never done), I would go after AJ, not Marshall.

I also don't like the thought of giving up early draft picks for an offensive player, when the Packers really need to focus on getting instant starters on defense.
UserPostedImage
9 years ago
I'd trade them a 3rd for Marshall if we don't get Cobb re-signed. He's got a few good years left and if we lose Cobb we gotta get some more weapons for the offense.
nerdmann
9 years ago

I would wait for Bears to cut him, looking at his contract they might do so before the 12th of March.
If he does not get cut I would not be intrested.

If he does get cut, I would however be very intrested to the tune of 5-7m a year, depending on the length of the contract.

Originally Posted by: lolleren 



He's too old to invest draft picks in him. Make him a Koren Robinson type deal.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
QCHuskerFan
9 years ago
I really despise the Dallas Cowboys. I would trade the Packers 5th rd pick to the Bears if we could then give Marshall to the Cowboys. He is a cancer. He is entering his 10th year in the league. His 9th year was one of his career worst. Which way is the arrow pointing? Is he going to get faster this year? Get healthier? But I would love to saddle Jerry with that salary for another used up cancer. Combining him with Dez would be a dream for the tabloids.

But on the Packers? Please no.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
greengold
9 years ago
I've already voiced my opinion on Marshall in a previous thread. Is he talented? Sure. But there is a REASON that a guy that talented is about to be booted off his 3rd team in 9 years. Normally a great talent like that you would lock up and try to sign long term.

The Broncos had no interest in keeping him.
The Dolphins gave him to the Bears for 2 3rd rounders I believe? The Bears probably got taken on the deal.
Now the Bears want to dump him.

Whoever wants him would be smart to wait until he gets cut.

Whoever signs him needs to keep him on a very short leash and don't give him much guaranteed money, so they can cut his ass easily when he becomes a problem.
Yerko
9 years ago


And there's this...

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I just want to be sure everyone knows this isn't the Brandon Marshall we are talking about, right? Or am I just stating the obvious...
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (6h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (14h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (22h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.