Suh= thug

Originally Posted by: wpr 

You realize thug is the new N word, and exactly.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

noun
1. a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber, or murderer.
2. (sometimes initial capital letter) one of a former group of professional robbers and murderers in India who strangled their victims.

Oh please give me a break. The word has been around for a 1000 years. Unless you are Indian, the Asian variety, there is no race associated with it at all.




Has there been some copyright or trademark been granted to criminal young urban Blacks? They didn't create the word.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Who cares what you and the rest of the right wingers think, it is the new N word and you and the rest of the bigots have something new to be disgusted about. White man's burden: it's a bitch! [roflmao]

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

Nope not a burden at all. Thug is not the N word just because you think it is.
Here is why- I would have called him a thug if he was purple. It is his actions that dictated the use not his skin color.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Aaaaaaand Dakota derails another thread. This is my shocked face.

Originally Posted by: IronMan 

You realize thug is the new N word, and exactly.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

Come on, Troy. Your attempted point is crap.
Suh is a thug. You can TRY to twist it into a racist thing, like most liberal racists do, but it has NOTHING to do with racism or the "N" word.
I would call Suh a thug if he was black, white, red, yellow (which he is, nothing to do with skin color) or WHATEVER color.
Just because someone TRYS to make it racial doesn't make it true.
What other words are supposedly BANNED from use now, according to you? I don't want to say something that might offend your sensitivity.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey