Area You Want Improved Most· Page 2

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

10 years ago

Why are so many runners getting to our ILBers in the first place? Are we keeping our ILBers closer to the LOS because of how weak our Dline is. Seems either the RB blows through the line and than is on top of our backers, or bounces outside and is on our LBers.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

I agree our DL is terrible and needs help. I guess the question was area "you" want improved most. I want bad ass MLB play that blows people up over the middle and people fear over the middle.

steveishere
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#12

Why are so many runners getting to our ILBers in the first place? Are we keeping our ILBers closer to the LOS because of how weak our Dline is. Seems either the RB blows through the line and than is on top of our backers, or bounces outside and is on our LBers.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

I think that's pretty much how it works for every team. That's why ILB/MLB always get so many tackles. Problems are if too many blockers are getting to your ILB or if your ILBs are simply not getting into good position to make tackles.

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

10 years ago

#13

Want the run game to show up.

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

wpr
Preferred Member

10 years ago

#14

I agree our DL is terrible and needs help. I guess the question was area "you" want improved most. I want bad ass MLB play that blows people up over the middle and people fear over the middle.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Wouldn't that be exciting football? Of course there is always some stupid ref who would throw the flag and try to neuter the LBer for playing hard.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#15

I agree our DL is terrible and needs help. I guess the question was area "you" want improved most. I want bad ass MLB play that blows people up over the middle and people fear over the middle.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

The way we have been lining up, sounds like a good job for Clay.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

StarrMax1
Registered

10 years ago

#16

Week 1 AJ Hawk plays 48 of 70 Defensive plays......Seattle 207 yds rushing.
avrg. - 5.6yds per rush

Week 2 AJ Hawk plays 71 of 71 Defensive plays.....NY Jets 142yds rushing.
avrg. - 3.83 yds per rush

coincidence 🤔

I think not!!!! [grin1]

I think when Dom said he went to the base 3-4 early in the 2nd quarter, it meant the same 11 stayed on the field.

They quit with all the substitutions.

Where and how the OLB's lined up didn't change the fact that they had their base 3-4 players in the game.

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

10 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: StarrMax1

Week 2
Brad Jones: 0 snaps out of 71
Jamari Lattimore: 59 snaps out of 71

Addition through subtraction

:-"

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

StarrMax1
Registered

10 years ago

#18

Week 2
Brad Jones: 0 snaps out of 71
Jamari Lattimore: 59 snaps out of 71

Addition through subtraction

:-"

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra

I'll agree with that, seems to me all AJ Hawk does is show up and play at a pretty high level every week. Some just can't get over the fact he was the #5 pick 9 years ago.

He's the ONE LB who could be depended on every play, every game, if needed since 2010.
(he sat 2 games in 2011 but could have played)(15-1 season).

As far as bad ass LBr's, that's what Mathews and Peppers are on the field for, especially playing a 3-4.

The 3-4, if working correctly is designed for the OLB's to make most of the impact plays.

Someone has to be the Defensive QB, that was Jones's job this year until the inevitable happened and once again AJ Hawk is called upon to pick up the slack.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#19

This game is won and lost in the trenches. (Wade, my 50th reference?)

Bring heat upon the QB, keep the heat off your QB. You do that in the draft, you do that in free agency. You live that. Other positions and priorities can absorb the priorities.

Ted tries to do it in the draft. Fair enough. Multiple busts. He could and should have tried to compensate for those busts by going to free agency.

No.

Offensive line draft- multiple injuries. Free agency pick-ups?

No.

Geezer Saturday and -show me as a Packer, doesn't seem to give a shit Peppers notwithstanding- don't think it would have been hard at all for Ted to look at what the Seahawks and 49ers were doing the last couple of years and at least consider keeping some pace by emulating them some...

No.

I'm getting a little tired of getting my ass totally beat by the premier teams in this conference. It's my ass, as I have one share of stock, lol

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#20

don't think it would have been hard at all for Ted to look at what the Seahawks and 49ers were doing the last couple of years and at least consider keeping some pace by emulating them some...

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

We did what the Hawks and 9ers a few years ago and it resulted in a SB title. 49ers already seem to have declined. Seahawks will also, Once they have to pay all the young players they have, especially the QB position.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (3m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (18m) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (20m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (20m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (21m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (21m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (25m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (25m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (26m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (26m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (28m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (30m) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (34m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (36m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (36m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (46m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (51m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (54m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (54m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (56m) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (1h) : Packers will get in

beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!

wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS