Pack93z
10 years ago



The Packers didn't sign him to a 10 year $200 million contract for crying out loud. They added him to their 90 man roster. Quite a bit of over reaction to this I believe.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Exactly.. if he doesn't work out.. little lost.

My only concern with the young man might not be in the short time frame... I am going to assume that he is going to tow the line to make his chance count. Logic would lend itself that way.

But often.. personally demons represent themselves.. especially those related to narcotics. Can he sustain the change over the long road with proper support? For him as a person, I certainly hope he succeeds short and long term.. if it benefits the Packers great, but if not, so be it if he can find his path in life.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
DoddPower
10 years ago

A broke clock is right more often than Bob McGinn. Why would any NFL team worry about the Packers? That makes absolutely no sense. One would think they have enough to worry about with their own team.

The Packers didn't sign him to a 10 year $200 million contract for crying out loud. They added him to their 90 man roster. Quite a bit of over reaction to this I believe.

This move puts everything on Colt Lyerla. The Packers have no risk in this move, none whatsoever. If anything at all, the league would give the Packers CREDIT for being willing to give a young man a second chance.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yeah, I don't get it at all. Much to do about nothing. What exactly is the risk involved here? A tiny signing bonus? It seems very low risk, high reward to me. Bob McGinn is annoying sometimes, and seems to be going downhill some lately. Although I guess as long as he is getting attention, he's doing his job. Even if it was true, I'm sure the Packers do not give to sh#ts about league "cred." I have no doubt there are players, coaches, and administrators around the league that appreciate when teams like the Packers give the Jolly's of the world a second chance. A lot of players have many issues to work through during their career, and make many mistake, but are otherwise "good" people. Some just need another chance and the support of the team.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
League cred? Got it.

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
play2win
10 years ago

A broke clock is right more often than Bob McGinn. Why would any NFL team worry about the Packers? That makes absolutely no sense. One would think they have enough to worry about with their own team.

The Packers didn't sign him to a 10 year $200 million contract for crying out loud. They added him to their 90 man roster. Quite a bit of over reaction to this I believe.

This move puts everything on Colt Lyerla. The Packers have no risk in this move, none whatsoever. If anything at all, the league would give the Packers CREDIT for being willing to give a young man a second chance.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I don't think there is a whole lot of overreaction. Just simple discernment of what the team might expect of a player like Lyerla in the coming months, and should he make the final roster. Blasting those Sandyhook comments on twitter, to me, was the worst of his transgressions. That is a PR nightmare for any team that takes him on. That cannot be denied. A pretty stupid move. That alone is a lot to overlook.

I also don't think he could have landed with a better organization than the Green Bay Packers. If any team can give this kid his best shot at succeeding and turning his life around, it would be the Packers. How Thompson, McCarthy and his staff decide to deal with him on their team will be the bigger story. They are giving him one hell of a gift in this chance to redeem himself. No?

Sure, GB has an out, and I agree with you that their reputation will not be tarnished by giving him this opportunity, as long as he is able to keep his life on track. If he cannot, well, then they release him and take their lumps in PR, for whatever might cause a release from the team... For instance, what if the program they put in place to help him doesn't take? And, what might we expect him to do? That can run the gamut. And, in this, McGinn could be on to something. We are a more "family" oriented team. I hope like hell Lyerla doesn't go off the rails and do something foolish here, like he did just months ago at Oregon. Those are valid concerns.

However, if he comes around, and proves his worth to this Packers team who chose to stick their necks out to give him this chance, all is good.

I do think the Packers staff will work very hard to positively mentor this player, and it could pay some huge dividends.
DoddPower
10 years ago

Sure, GB has an out, and I agree their reputation will not be tarnished by giving him this opportunity, as long as he is able to keep his life on track. If he cannot, well, then they release him and take their lumps in PR, for whatever might cause a release from the team... However, if he comes around, and proves his worth to a team who chose to stick their necks out to give him this chance, all is good.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



I don't see the "PR lumps" as a big deal at all. As far as I'm concerned, they could just state that they took a minor risk in an attempt to improve the football team. It didn't work out, and now they are moving forward. Next question. The media may try to leech on the story a little, but who cares. The media is horrible. The Aldon Smiths of the world deserve much more attention because they actually involve a substantial financial risk to the team.

Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Sure, GB has an out, and I agree with you that their reputation will not be tarnished by giving him this opportunity, as long as he is able to keep his life on track. If he cannot, well, then they release him and take their lumps in PR, for whatever might cause a release from the team... For instance, what if the program they put in place to help him doesn't take? And, what might we expect him to do? That can run the gamut. And, in this, McGinn could be on to something. We are a more "family" oriented team. I hope like hell Lyerla doesn't go off the rails and do something foolish here, like he did just months ago at Oregon. Those are valid concerns.

However, if he comes around, and proves his worth to this Packers team who chose to stick their necks out to give him this chance, all is good.

I do think the Packers staff will work very hard to positively mentor this player, and it could pay some huge dividends.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



Did the Ravens/Redskins/Patriots take a hit when they signed Donte Stallworth?
Did the Rams take a hit when they signed Leonard Little?
Did the Bills take a hit when they signed James Lofton?
Did the 49ers take a hit with Tim Harris?
Did the Packers take a hit with Antonio Freeman?

If any NFL team is subjecting criticism towards the Packers for signing Colt Lyerla to their 90 man roster, it is out of JEALOUSLY that they don't have the strength and leadership to withstand such a move.
UserPostedImage
play2win
10 years ago

I don't see the "PR lumps" as a big deal at all. As far as I'm concerned, they could just state that they took a minor risk in an attempt to improve the football team. It didn't work out, and now they are moving forward. Next question. The media may try to leech on the story a little, but who cares. The media is horrible. The Aldon Smiths of the world deserve much more attention because they actually involve a substantial financial risk to the team.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



All I'm saying is there are all kinds of scenarios that could come into play that might give the team a black eye. Some to lesser degrees than others, should he decide to take the wrong path. That huge "unknown" is the risk to the team. And, these are just real considerations the team has decided to take on in giving him this opportunity. I mean, we've seen some crazy shit that has happened throughout the league, Aldon Smith included...

I like that they are giving him a chance, just not willing to say there is no real risk to how the team is perceived, because we just don't know what he might do if the wheels come off.
play2win
10 years ago

Did the Ravens take a hit when they signed Donte Stallworth?
Did the Rams take a hit when they signed Leonard Little?
Did the Bills take a hit when they signed James Lofton?
Did the 49ers take a hit with Tim Harris?
Did the Packers take a hit with Antonio Freeman?

If any NFL team is subjecting criticism towards the Packers for signing Colt Lyerla to their 90 man roster, it is out of JEALOUSLY that they don't have the strength and leadership to withstand such a move.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I'm not talking about now.

I'm just considering what might lay ahead, should things not work out according to plan, that's all.

I think GB is in fine standing in giving him this chance as things stand today. And, yeah, i got it, he is signed to the 90 man roster. I'm really addressing what we may be faced with in the future. How will this player handle success? How will he handle failure? We're talking a lot of character stuff about a guy with some very recent character flaws and issues.

I already stated he couldn't have found a better place to land. And, I am really hopeful for the kid, and that he can indeed turn it around. It would be so great if he did.

Let's say we just go back to considering the positives he may bring to the Packers on the football field. Holy crap. That could be huge. A player at TE who can also play the H back and the FB positions... Enormous talent on the field. Again, this could be really, really good. And, GB is as sound an organization as a player could find. Especially when they need a shot at redeeming themselves and their careers.
Pack93z
10 years ago
Personally... this is "news" because there is little happening other than signings right now to discuss. There is some "baggage" to this signing.. so they are talking about it.

Just an UDFA signing.. little risk.. this one just might have a little more reward potential based on talent.

Sure other teams have noticed.. if he keeps his head on straight and his talent projects forward in the league.. it becomes another facet they have to defend. Anyone thinking that there is some negative impacts to this signing.. other than the over played "Packer people" nonsense.. it just isn't here.

Much like the Hubbard signing.. there might be a little more potential than average.

What strikes me funny though, is those that hammered the Hubbard signing, are celebrating this one. 🤔
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

I'm not talking about now.

I'm just considering what might lay ahead, should things not work out according to plan, that's all.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



You were provided several examples of previous signings to 53 man rosters of people committing worse, or allegedly committing worse. Rather than respond to the question of whether those teams took a hit, you sidestep it by saying you're not talking about now and you're talking about in the future. Well guess what, it is the future and I gave you examples of the past.

Lets say Colt does something stupid. Lets say he gets busted doing cocaine. He gets cut, the Packers move on.

How does this hurt the Packers? How does this effect them in any way? The teams mentioned earlier took no hit, why would the Packers take a hit for adding Colt to their 90 man roster?


Do you believe a team is not going to trade with the Packers because they gave Colt a chance?

Do you feel that a team would not agree to play them in the pre-season because they signed Colt?





UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (14h) : QB coach Sean Mannion
Zero2Cool (14h) : DL Coach DeMarcus Covington
dfosterf (17h) : from ft Belvoir, Quantico and points south. Somber reminder of this tragedy at Reagan Nat Airport
dfosterf (17h) : So eerily quiet here in Alexandria. I live in the flight path of commercial craft coming from the south and west, plus the military craft
dfosterf (17h) : So eeri
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Now that's a thought, maybe they're looking at the college ranks? Maybe not head coaches but DC/assistant DCs with league experience?
beast (22h) : College Coaches wouldn't want that publicly, as it would hurt recruiting and they might not get the job.
beast (22h) : I thought they were supposed to publicly announce them, at least the NFL ones. Hafley was from college, so I believe different rules.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Who knows who they're interviewing? I mean, nobody knew about Hafley and then out of nowhere he was hired
beast (30-Jan) : I wonder what's taking so long with hiring a DL coach, 2 of the 3 known to interview have already been hired elsewhere.
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Packers coach Matt LaFleur hires Luke Getsy as senior assistant, extends Rich Bisaccia's deal
Zero2Cool (27-Jan) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (27-Jan) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (27-Jan) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (26-Jan) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (26-Jan) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : I think this games over
beast (26-Jan) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (26-Jan) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (26-Jan) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.