One of my Ted Thompson issues· Page 2

play2win
Senior Member

10 years ago

Taking risks according to whom? The ESPN and NFL Network analysts? They do not represent the reality of how NFL teams actually feel. NFL teams have entire scouting departments. I don't think most of his picks are risks at all, in their opinion. They are just the players they feel are best to select at that position in the draft. Some fans put too much stock in analyst rankings. Also, Ted Thompson has made some pretty "safe" picks in terms of popular rankings in the first rounds the past few seasons.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower

Wow! Not a better post on the subject. Excellent point.

While all the stuff we do as fans who like the draft and all the speculation for however many months, there really is nothing to beat a chest about. We are getting just a small fraction of info, compared to what the professionals have in making very important decisions for their teams.

Millions of dollars ride on every player. Millions. The resources poured into these decisions are immense.

beast
Select Member

10 years ago

#12

Ted Thompson tries to outsmart everyone by picking these weird picks. I think he gets off on taking someone ala Khryi Thornton and having everyone go WTF? I understand the compulsion to be different and make a pick everyone goes WOW over but this basically means he bypasses the more commonly thought to be talent for the heroic Favre play... which often fail.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I think you're making a HUGE assumption... that assumption would be Thompson gives two cent about what others think. Which I believe is fans being egotistical, trying to imply what we think would matter to a GM when really he probably doesn't care ... at all.... what we think.

I think these "weird picks" are truly who Thompson and the Packers feel is the best player/PERSON available FOR THEM. And they just seem "weird" because we as fans weren't expecting them. But that doesn't mean the weird picks aren't the right ones.

I remember people saying drafting some kid named Aaron Rodgers was weird for a team that needs to get better targets and defense. As I turns out it was also the best player/person available for their team.

I've heard people complain that DT Khyri Thornton and LB Carl Bradford were "weird picks" but the fact of the matter is both are talented one gap players, which is rumored to be the new style of defense the Packers are going to.

As far as Khyri Thornton goes, he played on a horrible team which won one game in two years and was the main target for offenses to stop and so they double teamed him early and often. And mock draft people didn't really like him because he didn't make enough flashy plays as offenses focused on stopping him and keeping the ball away from him. Yet one of the better NFL scouting teams (if not best) with a pretty good track record grabbed him and we're questioning the team; instead of the mock draft people? To me that makes no sense.

Most likely is he just wasn't flashy enough for mock draft people so they over looked him, considering they're just there for te entertainment value... that's all the are... they don't have to live with the result. As long as people tune in to watch them they could be 100% and keep their jobs were as scouts, GMs and teams have to live with it.

wpr
Preferred Member

10 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: beast

very very few experts thought GB should pass on Aaron once they saw that e fell into their lap. Certainly they needed immediate help at other positions but anyone who knew anything recognized GB needed to pick up their QB of the future in 2005 or 2006 at the latest. Getting the QB was as important if not more so at that point.

beast
Select Member

10 years ago

#14

very very few experts thought GB should pass on Aaron

Originally Posted by: wpr

I said "people", not experts... and a lot of Packers fans seemed pretty upset with the drafting of Rodgers. As they wanted to get Favre another shot, not grab his replacement.

but anyone who knew anything recognized GB needed to pick up their QB of the future in 2005 or 2006 at the latest.

Originally Posted by: wpr

I'm not disagreeing with what you said, but that seems like re-writing it to make it seem better than what it truly was (which happens a lot it seems). After the 2005 1st round, a lot of Packers fans (including those who knew and recognized a lot) were upset as the Packers were looking more towards the future than getting Favre another weapon and another shot at winning the title, and I remember some continued to talk negative about Rodgers as he didn't look good in training camp the first two years.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#15

It isn't a HUGE assumption at all...TT said it himself... he likes to try and find the guy that other teams don't find. He doesn't enjoy drafting the expected talent.

Here's my example of how I perceive TT's mind to work. Adrian Peterson is available to be drafted and we're on the clock? Hmmm... Yeah, I could take AD, he's pretty good, but I kinda like this kid from the Quinnipiac intramural team that a guy who sacked my groceries at the Piggly Wiggly told me about.

I truly believe taking Clinton Dix was absolutely no fun for him. He would've much rather have found the next size speed project out of Maine ala Jerron McMillian. He's wired to do things like that and he said as much. I get that... however, do it with the UDFA's and leave the rest of it alone in the actual draft. I love that Ted Thompson finds talent late or as UDFA's... I just don't like him going with the "I'm smarter than you" kind of picks earlier. Minnesota seems to go with consensus guys early...and they've been more successful than us way up high. Yes, they've had their Ponder's... Moss, Harvin, AD, Patterson... guys who are difference makers and change games. Hard pressed to find 4 better going back 30 years for the Packers in the 1st round.

For the record, I was dancing when we took Rodgers...he was my favorite college QB of all time. I remember watching him in college and lamenting we'd never be terrible enough to get up high enough to draft him. I used to tell people he'd be better than Brett Favre and I'd get laughed at. What a draft day that was...one of my favorites. I can't imagine where we'd be if Ted Thompson hadn't made that pick.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

mi_keys
Senior Member

10 years ago

#16

Here's my example of how I perceive TT's mind to work. Adrian Peterson is available to be drafted and we're on the clock? Hmmm... Yeah, I could take AD, he's pretty good, but I kinda like this kid from the Quinnipiac intramural team that a guy who sacked my groceries at the Piggly Wiggly told me about.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Poor wind up attempt. 3/10. Try again.

Born and bred a cheesehead

steveishere
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Worst analogy/example ever? Yeah, probably.

I truly believe taking Clinton Dix was absolutely no fun for him. He would've much rather have found the next size speed project out of Maine ala Jerron McMillian. He's wired to do things like that and he said as much. I get that... however, do it with the UDFA's and leave the rest of it alone in the actual draft. I love that Ted Thompson finds talent late or as UDFA's... I just don't like him going with the "I'm smarter than you" kind of picks earlier. Minnesota seems to go with consensus guys early...and they've been more successful than us way up high. Yes, they've had their Ponder's... Moss, Harvin, AD, Patterson... guys who are difference makers and change games. Hard pressed to find 4 better going back 30 years for the Packers in the 1st round.

For the record, I was dancing when we took Rodgers...he was my favorite college QB of all time. I remember watching him in college and lamenting we'd never be terrible enough to get up high enough to draft him. I used to tell people he'd be better than Brett Favre and I'd get laughed at. What a draft day that was...one of my favorites. I can't imagine where we'd be if Ted Thompson hadn't made that pick.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

That doesn't mesh at all with his history of 1st round picks. Hawk, Raji, Bulaga,Sherrod, Perry, Datone Jones were all consensus/no-brainer type of guys at their spots in the draft.

play2win
Senior Member

10 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I agree on Rodgers. At the time I was thinking getting him at #24 in 2005 could not have been better timing, as Favre had been throwing the retirement thing out there for 3 years. This coming from a guy who desperately wanted to give him more weapons to seal another deal.

As for the rest, I tend to agree on some of that too. At least, that was my thinking with the Thornton and Rodgers picks initially. I'm sure you felt that way with the Adams pick, but I don't, especially after hearing his comments recently, saying they were putting a premium on the receivers who had the very best hands.

Thornton brings some very interesting qualities too, that make me think this was far more targeted than an average flier/risk-reward selection. He plays every position on the line, has great size, exceptional hand work, great speed, and was a steady riser on many draft boards. The latter a component we lay people were not privy to.

I thought Ted did FAR better the last half of our draft, especially with what I've learned after the fact. Seems like he really ramped up the back end of our last few drafts after those abysmal 2011 and 2012 back end offerings.

http://www.packers.com/history/draft-history.html

beast
Select Member

10 years ago

#19

It isn't a HUGE assumption at all...TT said it himself... he likes to try and find the guy that other teams don't find. He doesn't enjoy drafting the expected talent.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Yes it is a huge assumption and it seems you made two more within this statement.
Ted Thompson said he likes to find hidden gems, you assume that means he also likes to draft them high like you're suggesting. Personally you can wait and let the hidden gems fall to you (like Josh Sitton, I still have NO CLUE how that guy wasn't given a combine invite, he was on my little poor draft radar well before the combine). and let them fall to you.

Again Ted Thompson said he likes to find hidden gems, you assume that's telling you something... if you can name a single GM or scout that doesn't like finding hidden gems that I can show you someone that doesn't like doing their job... because that's basically the job, turning over ever prospect you can find and evaluating them. If your an NFL GM or scout and don't like looking for hidden gems then you have the wrong job.

Thompson is doing what Thompson always has done... speaking enough to get the media and NFL off his back, while saying nothing of importance or meaning, only stating the obvious... which makes people want to read between the lines when there is nothing between the lines to read.

I truly believe taking Clinton Dix was absolutely no fun for him. He would've much rather have found the next size speed project out of Maine ala Jerron McMillian. He's wired to do things like that and he said as much.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

He didn't say that at all... NOT AT ALL!

I truly believe you're mentally going crazy over how you struggling to figure out what is going through Thompson mind to the point where you're reading what he says and going off on wild assumptions.

wpr
Preferred Member

10 years ago

#20

I remember people saying drafting some kid named Aaron Rodgers was weird for a team that needs to get better targets and defense. As I turns out it was also the best player/person available for their team.

I said "people", not experts... and a lot of Packers fans seemed pretty upset with the drafting of Rodgers. As they wanted to get Favre another shot, not grab his replacement.

I'm not disagreeing with what you said, but that seems like re-writing it to make it seem better than what it truly was (which happens a lot it seems). After the 2005 1st round, a lot of Packers fans (including those who knew and recognized a lot) were upset as the Packers were looking more towards the future than getting Favre another weapon and another shot at winning the title, and I remember some continued to talk negative about Rodgers as he didn't look good in training camp the first two years.

Originally Posted by: beast

Since when do we give any credence to "people"? First thing to remember is that a huge segment of Packer fans were not really Packer fans. They were favorites who worshiped at the altar of Kiln so the impression that you are thinking about is tainted at best.

So for me I am not rewriting history. (I know you are not implying that I am.) The day before the draft I would have been looking at other players. When Aaron fell THAT far there was only one player I wanted. I don't know why there even had to be a discussion. The only reason GB delayed making the selection was to wait and see if another team was going to offer them a ton of draft picks.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (2h) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter

beast (2h) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.

dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that

dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good

beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.

dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?

Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is

Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected

Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.

Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason

Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M

Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok

Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?

Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell

Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins

Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.

Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.

Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol

Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?

packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22