beast
11 years ago

I've seen players do it before but not quite this emphatically. Call for the review I mean. When he jumped up the first place he looked was to the ref and as soon as he saw the incomplete pass signal he went crazy. When a guy goes that nuts you just know he caught the ball.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I've seen guys go crazy like that and be wrong... just like Dez Bryant went crazy with the holding call against him (which was a good call). Or Golden Tate swearing up and down that he didn't push off of no one dearing the "fail mary" play, which many people called him a liar because he clearly and totally shoved Shields away, but I don't think he was (knowing lying) as much as he just deleted it from his memory (or didn't record it) as it was happening and honestly didn't remember the shove.

But I've seen the same thing with INT, when a guy would get one like Williams first INT (which was over turned), and the ref call it correctly in the first place as the tip of the ball clearly was loose and touched the ball, as they landed it to catch it. And then flipped out when the refs said the ball hit the ground.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
11 years ago

I've seen players do it before but not quite this emphatically. Call for the review I mean. When he jumped up the first place he looked was to the ref and as soon as he saw the incomplete pass signal he went crazy. When a guy goes that nuts you just know he caught the ball. I also loved the way he says he wouldn't give the ref the ball back so they would review it. Smart of McCarthy to call the TO to give them the chance. I was wondering if they would. I know the cowboys hurried to get the next play off and it looked like they did actually snap the ball but the TO was called just in time. Of course they gave the TO back because the booth did decide to review it after all but it was close. Too close actually.

Would McCarthy had been penalized if he had thrown the flag. I know that throwing the flag on plays that are not reviewable can be a no no but what about plays that are initiated by the booth? If so that is wrong. Had we been out of time outs we may have been screwed had the refs not decided to review it or had they been too slow. The coach needs to be able to make the challenge anytime he feels the need as long as he has a challenge left.

Anyway, that may have been my favorite play of all time based on the reaction of the player afterwards. You notice he wasn't nearly as vocal on the one that was reversed that he didn't catch.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



actually quite surprised that the play got reviewed. Usually like you said; a challenge flag or timeout isnt going to make the refs take a look at a 'missed' turn over again. How many bad calls have you seen get not reviewed? ... a ton.

not sure if it was these announcers or the lions game ... but it was suggested that they allow ref calls to be challenge-able also.

nerdmann
11 years ago
Seems to me the mafia didn't want us to win that game.

We beat the 'Gurlz AND the officials. It can be done.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

Seems to me the mafia didn't want us to win that game.

We beat the 'Gurlz AND the officials. It can be done.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



no wait a minute. Wasn't it you that before the game said the officials will favor GB because they we the underdog in the game? You can't have it both ways. They can't have one agenda before the game then change their minds and form a new conspiracy.
UserPostedImage
sschind
  • sschind
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
11 years ago

actually quite surprised that the play got reviewed. Usually like you said; a challenge flag or timeout isnt going to make the refs take a look at a 'missed' turn over again. How many bad calls have you seen get not reviewed? ... a ton.

not sure if it was these announcers or the lions game ... but it was suggested that they allow ref calls to be challenge-able also.

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



Maybe surprised that they decided to review it on their own but you would hope that once the TO was called they would have looked at it. If the booth is going to be in charge of reviews in the last 2 minutes they need to be looking at every single play to see if there is a reason to review. During the rest of the game if a coach is unsure of a call and he decides not to throw the flag that is his prerogative but if you take that opportunity away from the coach you have the responsibility to make sure each play is looked at.

I'd even like to add certain penalties to the challenge list. Not holding or PI or some of the subjective calls but...oh...maybe something like... ILLEGAL MOTION. I think the coaches should be able to challenge if they think a defensive lineman was drawn off sides and if a booth official sees that the guys on the field screwed up by missing the movement they should call for their own review.

.
sschind
  • sschind
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
11 years ago

I've seen guys go crazy like that and be wrong... just like Dez Bryant went crazy with the holding call against him (which was a good call). Or Golden Tate swearing up and down that he didn't push off of no one dearing the "fail mary" play, which many people called him a liar because he clearly and totally shoved Shields away, but I don't think he was (knowing lying) as much as he just deleted it from his memory (or didn't record it) as it was happening and honestly didn't remember the shove.

But I've seen the same thing with INT, when a guy would get one like Williams first INT (which was over turned), and the ref call it correctly in the first place as the tip of the ball clearly was loose and touched the ball, as they landed it to catch it. And then flipped out when the refs said the ball hit the ground.

Originally Posted by: beast 



We see players call for PI on just about every incomplete pass and when it is called the guilty party always looks like "who me?" but that is different. That's a fairly subjective call in a lot of cases and in a lot of cases they may be right. What is called on one play ma y not be called on another. It's the way the game has evolved. Its like the holding calls that you could call on every play if you wished. Almost every pass play has some sort of interference if you wanted to be a prick about it and not let the guys play.

As far as the Interceptions, yeah I have seen that as well but like I said I have never seen a player act as animated as Williams did after this one. When I saw his reaction to the incomplete pass call I was reminded of Favre and his Super Bowl run onto the field with his arms raised. The way he (Williams) was making the "throw the flag" motion I though he might dislocate his shoulder. I just knew he had caught that pass. He didn't react like that after the first one because he probably knew that he didn't really catch it, even though he will contend that he thought he did. The reaction that I saw told me he wasn't really convinced he did.


nerdmann
11 years ago

no wait a minute. Wasn't it you that before the game said the officials will favor GB because they we the underdog in the game? You can't have it both ways. They can't have one agenda before the game then change their minds and form a new conspiracy.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



You think the game was called fairly?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

You think the game was called fairly?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



First I do not believe the JFK conspiracy theories.

I do not believe in little black helicopters.

There is not a game by game agenda by the NFL to have the officials call the game in favor of one team or another.

Lousy calls are lousy calls. Some officiating crews do a better job than others.

You sir need to admit you were wrong in one of your two comments. I don't care which one. You can not say that the refs will slant their calls to GB because GB was the perceived weaker team and then say the refs had a plan to favor Dallas with their calls. Which of the two are you going to admit that you wrong?

UserPostedImage
Cheesey
11 years ago

First I do not believe the JFK conspiracy theories.

I do not believe in little black helicopters.

There is not a game by game agenda by the NFL to have the officials call the game in favor of one team or another.

Lousy calls are lousy calls. Some officiating crews do a better job than others.

You sir need to admit you were wrong in one of your two comments. I don't care which one. You can not say that the refs will slant their calls to GB because GB was the perceived weaker team and then say the refs had a plan to favor Dallas with their calls. Which of the two are you going to admit that you wrong?

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Well, first......I DO believe in JFK conspiracy, as I was on the "grassy knoll!"

I don't believe in little black helicopters either.......but BIG black ones, YES!!!

And Nerdman is preparing himself for a run in politics, thus the "two opposing comments".😆 [grin1] 😆 [grin1]
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
11 years ago

Well, first......I DO believe in JFK conspiracy, as I was on the "grassy knoll!"

I don't believe in little black helicopters either.......but BIG black ones, YES!!!

And Nerdman is preparing himself for a run in politics, thus the "two opposing comments".😆 [grin1] 😆 [grin1]

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Not really.

Generally speaking, the officials will tend to favor the underdogs. Didn't happen in this specific case. Then again, Romo in December? That could legitimately be construed as an underdog. lol

I've posited the theory in the past that Favre threw many of those INTs on purpose. And took that sack for Strahan's record on purpose. I'm beginning to suspect the same of Romo. Shit's definitely a pattern with him.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (30m) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
    Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
    Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
    Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
    beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
    packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
    dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
    Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
    Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
    beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
    beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
    buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
    wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
    beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
    Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
    dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
    Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
    Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
    TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Ruven

    9m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    21m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    22m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    24m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    25m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    26m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    27m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    29m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    31m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    33m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    34m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    36m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    37m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    38m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Ruven

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.