wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

Greene's been an assistant for what, 4 years? lol

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



He became a coach for the Packers in 2009. Your point is what? That 4 years of coaching along with 14 years as a player is not enough to know what the entire defense should be doing?
UserPostedImage
steveishere
11 years ago
There are teams with personnel that arent really anything special but their defenses are a lot better
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

There are teams with personnel that arent really anything special but their defenses are a lot better

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



= better coaching.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
11 years ago
And also maybe their personnel is a little better than you assume it is. We are all outsiders so we really don't know. Our hope is that what has happened this year is correctly evaluation in the off-season and the right change comes from that. I expect coaching turnover though, but it comes at a price.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
DakotaT
11 years ago
I'd actually rather go with Mike Singletary. I think Kevin Greene is pretty decent at his current job, but you don't promote the C student to a manager position. There's a higher level of thinking involved in the DC position. And I would take for granted our tackling would get better.
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
11 years ago

I'd actually rather go with Mike Singletary. I think Kevin Greene is pretty decent at his current job, but you don't promote the C student to a manager position. There's a higher level of thinking involved in the DC position. And I would take for granted our tackling would get better.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



What would they run under Singletary? 3-4 or 4-3.

I remember my dad telling me about how good the Bears D was back in the 80s and how bad they wanted to beat teams. Told me that one time Singletary was asked by a reporter what would be a good day on defense for the Bears. His response? Zero yards allowed.

ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

I'd actually rather go with Mike Singletary. I think Kevin Greene is pretty decent at his current job, but you don't promote the C student to a manager position. There's a higher level of thinking involved in the DC position. And I would take for granted our tackling would get better.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I forgot Mike was out there. I like his passion too. šŸ‘
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

What would they run under Singletary? 3-4 or 4-3.

I remember my dad telling me about how good the Bears D was back in the 80s and how bad they wanted to beat teams. Told me that one time Singletary was asked by a reporter what would be a good day on defense for the Bears. His response? Zero yards allowed.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 



How long has Singletary been out of coaching, and why? The Bears ran 4-3 with him, so that would be the safe assumption.

What is the fascination some have with Greene? He seems like nothing more than a WWE loud mouth clown - ok for firing up players on the sidelines, but not equipped for any planning or scheming of a defense. Maybe THAT is why no other team has grabbed him.

I say again, the Packers would be stupid to keep Capers' system and get rid of Capers. And with the weak personnel the Packers have, we simply CAN'T play straight up normal defense. We NEED some kind of scheming/finessing/trickery/outguessing in order to stop anybody.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Mucky Tundra
11 years ago

How long has Singletary been out of coaching, and why? The Bears ran 4-3 with him, so that would be the safe assumption.

What is the fascination some have with Greene? He seems like nothing more than a WWE loud mouth clown - ok for firing up players on the sidelines, but not equipped for any planning or scheming of a defense. Maybe THAT is why no other team has grabbed him.

I say again, the Packers would be stupid to keep Capers' system and get rid of Capers. And with the weak personnel the Packers have, we simply CAN'T play straight up normal defense. We NEED some kind of scheming/finessing/trickery/outguessing in order to stop anybody.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



I meant when he coached the 49ers d? That was a 4-3 unit yes?

Well, seeing how the past 4 games teams have mopped the floor with our D maybe we need a guy who can get these guys fired up and willing to hit people and make plays. I'll take the rah rah rah guys on D over guys like Capers who have the energy level of an old man playing checkers.
ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
play2win
11 years ago
Both our personnel and our coaching are being outclassed on a regular basis.

We are clearly not as well off personnel-wise as some of us may have thought. Our wins v. Redskins, Lions, Ravens, Browns and Vikings gave us a good standing statistically going into the Bears game, but our defense was well handled by the offenses of SF and CIN. Since that time we have literally tanked on D.

If defense wins championships, we are not in the race at all and we should be bowing out of this season. We should be looking to save Aaron Rodgers from further injury instead of rushing his return to the lineup. Reload and retool next season. Get a new defensive coaching staff in place, and give them to players they really needā€¦ and, Mike McCarthy runs this staff. He should be having his feet held to the fire for letting this get so out of control, which is exactly what it is. Out of control.

This is clearly a bad team, save for a handful of players, masked by the extraordinary talents of Aaron Rodgers. If anything, Rodgers' injury is giving us a clear read on our weaknesses, and they look pretty severe. Both coaching and personnel.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (11h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (11h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (14h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (14h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (14h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (14h) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (14h) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (14h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (14h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (14h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (15h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (16h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (16h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (18h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (19h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (19h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (20h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (21h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.