Yes I am aware of it. Nevertheless I have to use the real stats when discussing Zero's question/comment. It doesn't matter whether or not that GB got jobbed.
That said 3-3 is still nothing to brag about. All that means is they were mediocre against good teams. If you deduct 25 yards off the total their total defensive average is still 343 per game and still 15th place.
Originally Posted by: wpr
I know everyone here is probably aware at that... and I wasn't going after you... and didn't mean to make it seem like that. I was just venting about that game.... nothing against you or your stats... just feel like there always needs to be an "*" next to that game and the W/L to it.
As far as real... the Packers getting screwed in that game was real. And everyone here (I think) knows it. Again just venting in general... nothing against what you're saying.
And 3-3 is better than most teams (which I think better than most teams) is something to brag about though I know we all have our different standards. Or at least better than the rest of the NFC North. I know that's nothing worth bragging about to some of the others on here.
And I know "should of" means nothings....
actually it does mean something...
it makes it worse.
... but the Packers should of been 5-1 against those teams.
Packers lost to the 49ers.
Packers got screwed by the refs against the Seahawks
Packers screwed themselves in the second half of the Colts game.
And they shouldn't of lost to the Vikings in week 17.
Also if they would have beat the Vikings in week 17, I think the Bears would of made the playoffs instead... and Lovie Smith might still be with the Bears. And personally I liked Lovie and company not being able to figure out what they should do on offense [grin1]