Bishop's departure part of Packers' 'transition' on defense· Page 2

nerdmann
Premier Member

11 years ago

Yeah the last game was the one that mattered. I hate seeing capers quote his rankings all the time. I dont care if they were ranked first if they get utterly destroyed and embarrassed in a playoff game they had a shit defense. This was 2 times Capers had a team with a "top 15" ranking and had an all-time bad showing in the playoffs so dont tell me what your ranking was.

Originally Posted by: steveishere

That's all true, but at the same time, the statistics and rankings from the overall season are a pretty good barometer for the quality if your team's performance. Flukes can happen in one game.

I don't fear the Niners. They didn't dominate us, so much as we shit ourselves.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

11 years ago

#12

I'd like to see rankings against playoff teams.

wpr
Preferred Member

11 years ago

#13

I'd like to see rankings against playoff teams.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

nicht sehr gut

wpr
Preferred Member

11 years ago

#14

Week 1 SFran Total Net Yards 377 H L
Week 3 Seattle Total Net Yards 238 A L
Week 5 Indy Total Net Yards 464 A L
Week 6 Houston Total Net Yards 321 A W
Week 13 Minn Net Yards Rushing 240 H W
Week 17 Minn Total Net Yards 444 A L

Total avg 347

That is 15th overall. But in the important category they were 2-4. 1-1 Home 1-3 Away

beast
Select Member

11 years ago

#15

If the Refs didn't screw the Packers in the Seahawks game it would be...

Week 1 SFran Total Net Yards 377 H L
Week 3 Seattle Total Net Yards 238 A W
Week 5 Indy Total Net Yards 464 A L
Week 6 Houston Total Net Yards 321 A W
Week 13 Minn Net Yards Rushing 240 H W
Week 17 Minn Total Net Yards 444 A L

Total avg 347

That is 15th overall. But in the important category they were 3-3. 1-1 Home 2-2 Away

Originally Posted by: wpr

Also it wasn't just that last play (thought the pass off on shields was a major missed called)

With 8:44 left in the game, Wilson threw an INT, and they called roughing the passer on Walden for what looked like a legal tackle. They said he tackle Wilson too low (I think it's illegal to hit QBs at the knee or below) but looks like Walden hit/grabbed a thigh which is above the knee.

It should of been Packers ball at the Seahawks (about) 25 yard line.

Packers got screwed with a couple of calls in the finish of that game.

And the Packers screwed themselve in the second half of the Colts game... but at least the Packers earn that loss by playing worse... and the Colts players earned the win by playing better... the Seahawks didn't earn that win.

wpr
Preferred Member

11 years ago

#16

If the Refs didn't screw the Packers in the Seahawks game it would be...

Also it wasn't just that last play (thought the pass off on shields was a major missed called)

With 8:44 left in the game, Wilson threw an INT, and they called roughing the passer on Walden for what looked like a legal tackle. They said he tackle Wilson too low (I think it's illegal to hit QBs at the knee or below) but looks like Walden hit/grabbed a thigh which is above the knee.

It should of been Packers ball at the Seahawks (about) 25 yard line.

Packers got screwed with a couple of calls in the finish of that game.

Originally Posted by: beast

Yes I am aware of it. Nevertheless I have to use the real stats when discussing Zero's question/comment. It doesn't matter whether or not that GB got jobbed.

That said 3-3 is still nothing to brag about. All that means is they were mediocre against good teams. If you deduct 25 yards off the total their total defensive average is still 343 per game and still 15th place.

beast
Select Member

11 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: wpr

I know everyone here is probably aware at that... and I wasn't going after you... and didn't mean to make it seem like that. I was just venting about that game.... nothing against you or your stats... just feel like there always needs to be an "*" next to that game and the W/L to it.

As far as real... the Packers getting screwed in that game was real. And everyone here (I think) knows it. Again just venting in general... nothing against what you're saying.

And 3-3 is better than most teams (which I think better than most teams) is something to brag about though I know we all have our different standards. Or at least better than the rest of the NFC North. I know that's nothing worth bragging about to some of the others on here.

And I know "should of" means nothings.... actually it does mean something... it makes it worse.

... but the Packers should of been 5-1 against those teams.

Packers lost to the 49ers.
Packers got screwed by the refs against the Seahawks
Packers screwed themselves in the second half of the Colts game.
And they shouldn't of lost to the Vikings in week 17.

Also if they would have beat the Vikings in week 17, I think the Bears would of made the playoffs instead... and Lovie Smith might still be with the Bears. And personally I liked Lovie and company not being able to figure out what they should do on offense [grin1]

wpr
Preferred Member

11 years ago

#18

... but the Packers should of been 5-1 against those teams.

Packers lost to the 49ers.
Packers got screwed by the refs against the Seahawks
Packers screwed themselves in the second half of the Colts game.
And they shouldn't of lost to the Vikings in week 17.

Also if they would have beat the Vikings in week 17, I think the Bears would of made the playoffs instead... and Lovie Smith might still be with the Bears. And personally I liked Lovie and company not being able to figure out what they should do on offense [grin1]

Originally Posted by: beast

agreed.
if the bares made the playoffs: 1 more win & 168 yards and 190 vs 240 & 444. Would have made a difference. (In the stats anyhow. They still would have been thumped by SF.)

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (now) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (now) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (2m) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (12m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (17m) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (21m) : Packers will get in

beast (21m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (27m) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (27m) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (3h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (3h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (13h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (13h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!

wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.

beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!

beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed

Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)

Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.

Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”

packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB

Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him

beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie

Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b

Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with

packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie

beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.

Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS