wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Clay Matthews' return from injury helped the Green Bay Packers dominate the Chicago Bears offense with his big impact in rushing the passer and helping to stop the run.

He finished the game with a crazy stat-line of two sacks, four tackles for a loss, and two pass defenses in his first game back from the hamstring injury that kept him out of the lineup for four games.

Matthews was especially productive considering he didn't play the full amount of snaps, as the Packers tried to ease him back into game action.

Initially, the Packers struggled to contain the Bears running game and Matt Forte. He rushed for 37 yards on the game's opening drive as the Bears drove down the field with ease. A false start penalty and an incompletion forced a punt. It was nice to force a punt, but it appeared it would be a long day with Forte running wild.

On the second possession, Matthews showed his ability to impact the game in other ways than through rushing the passer. With the game still waiting to be broken open, the Bears had great field position and had been having their way in the run game.

The Bears ran Forte for a 1-yard gain on first down and lined up looking ready to run on second down, needing nine yards for a first down.

B.J. Raji and Matthews got a great burst off the snap and each had a step on their blockers. Both were in great position if the hand-off were to go to Forte.

As the ball got handed off to Forte, Matthews' blocker had already failed at his desperation dive, leaving one Bears lineman, J'Marcus Webb, to deal with both Raji and Matthews. That's probably the best scenario the Packers could ask for on a given play.

As Raji got past Webb, Matthews gave a little nudge to ensure Webb was unable to recover to make the block.

Matthews then immediately bolted for Forte and finished the play as Raji can't bring down Forte. The loss of four yards turned a manageable down-and-distance into third-and-long. The Bears couldn't convert and the Packers were able to get the ball and take back some ground in the early battle for field position.

On the next drive, Matthews showed his vital impact in the pass rush with the same type of playmaking ability that ended a Chicago attack. His sack of Jay Cutler on third down forced another Bears punt.

Later in the game, Matthews got his second sack on a play that helped the Packers keep the Bears at a distance.

After an offensive pass interference penalty on Alshon Jeffery and a 3-yard gain by Forte, the Bears faced a second-and-long situation.

They lined up in an obvious passing formation with nobody in the backfield alongside Jay Cutler. The Packers lined up with Raji and Mike Daniels as the only down linemen and Matthews and Dezman Moses as outside backers.

The Packers ran a stunt with Matthews coming over the top of Raji and attacking the middle of the Bears offensive line as both linemen, Matthews and Moses, rush the passer.

As Matthews got over the top, two Bears blocked Raji, two blocked Daniels and one blocked Moses, leaving Matthews a free run at Cutler.

Matthews makes the Bears pay for their offensive line miscue by sacking Jay Cutler and forcing an insurmountable distance to gain on third down. The Bears line was so focused on Raji and Matthews coming from the left side, that when Matthews got towards the middle, the Bears were out of position.

The attention Matthews is able to draw allows the Packers to be much more creative in getting him and other players opportunities to find holes on the line.

If you look at the picture above, Matthews' ability to get to the quarterback not only resulted in a negative play for the Bears, but prevented a big positive one. Alshon Jeffery was able to get a step on Sam Shields and would have been open for a big-play opportunity if Cutler had had time to get the ball out of his hands.

Matthews' presence on the field was a huge factor in the Packers' ability to dominate the Bears offense both by stopping the run and rushing the passer. He consistently made big plays that ended Bears drives and kept points off the board.

With his ability to rush the passer individually and help others on the line get better matchups, Matthews also takes pressure off the secondary. This was the case when Shields was beaten by Jeffery, but Cutler was sacked.

This is the case not only on plays ending in sacks, but throughout the game as Cutler was having to throw quickly or worrying about locating Matthews and the rest of the pass rush.

Matthews being back in the lineup allows the Packers defense to get much more creative. The group has a chance to really get into a nice stride down the stretch. With a more balanced attack offensively, the Packers could be set for a long playoff run with the Matthews-led defense playing well.



the photos that go along with the narrative are at the bleacher report site. 

UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Now you people see why I say sacks are so important?

Let's do a repeat of what I said before.
2010 - we win the SB with 47 sacks
2011 - we go one and done with 29 sacks
2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Sacks more often than not end drives. [boxing]

A nice breakdown of CM3's performance that game. Yes, he helped us shut down da Bears big time.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Now you people see why I say sacks are so important?

Let's do a repeat of what I said before.
2010 - we win the SB with 47 sacks
2011 - we go one and done with 29 sacks
2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Sacks more often than not end drives. [boxing]

A nice breakdown of CM3's performance that game. Yes, he helped us shut down da Bears big time.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Sacks are important but not all sacks are equal.
A sack for a 1 yard loss on first down is a whole lot different than a 7 yard loss on 3rd down.
UserPostedImage
coltonja
12 years ago

2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Hey, zombie, I have a question for you. I was thinking about our season at work tonight and comparing it to the feeling of the 2010 team going into and early in the playoffs. I felt in 2010 that we would go all the way, whereas this season I see us winning one and then being out. But it was just a feeling, and I don't put much stock in feelings when it comes to most things yet I seem unable to shake it.

Anyway, I enjoy your insight here at PH and was wondering why you felt this way too?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Hey, zombie, I have a question for you. I was thinking about our season at work tonight and comparing it to the feeling of the 2010 team going into and early in the playoffs. I felt in 2010 that we would go all the way, whereas this season I see us winning one and then being out. But it was just a feeling, and I don't put much stock in feelings when it comes to most things yet I seem unable to shake it.

Anyway, I enjoy your insight here at PH and was wondering why you felt this way too?

Originally Posted by: coltonja 



We didn't have the D we did in 2010. It all fell apart in 2011. 🇦🇷 carried that team on his back. It will take 🇹🇹 two years to rebuild that joke of a D (2011's). 2012 is the first year. 🇹🇹 went all out D. In 2013, he'll go D again but sprinkle in a little OL. I think 2013 we'll have a better shot at winning it all.

And yes, 2010 I felt like we'd win it all. I had that feeling in 1996, 2003, and 2010. Of those 3 years, I was only wrong once. (I didn't have that feeling in 1997 as that year, we seemed like we were missing the chip on our shoulder and didn't have the Cows to piss us off).

We're definitely hungry in 2012 and have a chip on our shoulder. I'd take the 2012 team > 2011. But I think our injuries this year were worse than 2010. Our OL scares me.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5m) : It's better to have $17m to use on players who will be on the field. That's why trade/release is talked
Zero2Cool (6m) : post june is $7m cap hit with $17m saving
Zero2Cool (6m) : oops meant $10m cap hit
Zero2Cool (7m) : And pre june is $10m savings
Zero2Cool (7m) : Can't make him play.
dhazer (13m) : I am curious why the big need to release Jaire, we have 29 million cap space we arent spending and would only gain $6 million/ make him play
Zero2Cool (1h) : Joey Bosa signed with Bills?
dfosterf (1h) : What they are offering is a left over case of Leinies from the Chippewa Falls plant
Zero2Cool (1h) : 27, 59, 91, 129 gets you Jaire and our 3rd
Zero2Cool (1h) : they give us those five, or even first four, they can have Jaire.
Zero2Cool (1h) : 27, 59, 91, 129 and 136 are only ones worth having of theirs.
dfosterf (1h) : What they don't have is cap space, at least presently at 5.6 mil
dfosterf (1h) : Poor bastards only have 11
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ravens ain't got crap for picks.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Aaron Rodgers is choosing between Steelers and Giants. The Vikings are officially out on him, per RapSheet
dfosterf (2h) : Current cap space 29.6 million.
dfosterf (2h) : Hobbs 2025 cap hit just under 6 million. Banks 2025 cap hit just over 9 million
Mucky Tundra (9h) : beast, this is news to me! Tell me more about these, "draft picks." They seem mighty mysterious! 😉
beast (11h) : Yes, the Ravens have draft picks
dfosterf (12h) : Good luck to him.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Eric Stokes signs with Raiders
Martha Careful (14h) : Tyler Linderbaum C
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Cap space?
Zero2Cool (14h) : Do Ravens have anything we'd even entertain to have?
Mucky Tundra (16h) : I've seen trade ideas of Jaire going to the Ravens all offseason
beast (17h) : A probably false rumor is suggesting CB Jaire Alexander is being traded to the Ravens, again probably false
beast (17h) : Commanders might have a dominant offense the next 3 years at least
Zero2Cool (19h) : San Francisco 49ers announced they have released DL Leonard Floyd.
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Er getting traded twice like that
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Huh, LT Laremy Tunsil traded from Houston to Washington. Never heard of a top OT getting traded in his career like that
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : Minnesota Vikings cornerback Byron Murphy Jr. is returning on a three-year, $66 million deal
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : Damn
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : Saints are re-signing DE Chase Young to a three-year, $51 million deal worth up to $57 million.
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : 49ers releasing FB Juszcyk any interest?
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : digits of four
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : four digits
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : Eh, don't think so. better to split
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : on new site, would Fan Shout and GameDay Chat show same messages?
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : The Hall of Fame stuff probably came from a scout as Zero said; at this point though it's hard to see them moving ZT from RT
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : Regarding ZT at C, Gute had said he felt C was ZTs best position after he was drafted.
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : LB Oren Burks to sign a 2-year, $5M deal with the Bengals.
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : Based on how it was worded at the time, probably scout.
beast (10-Mar) : I don't think the media person ever told the public the source, but Gute or LaFleur did say they thought Tom has earned his spot at OT
beast (10-Mar) : I think it was supposedly unnamed Packers source
buckeyepackfan (10-Mar) : Was that Gute or Lefleur or someone else?
buckeyepackfan (10-Mar) : Zach Tom could be a really good guard, an all pro tackle, but probably be a HOF Center. Who said that?
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : It's March 10th. I don't think anything is done.
Martha Careful (10-Mar) : if we think CB is done, we have a poor roster
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : CB and OG in FA, narrows down the top of the draft board a little
Martha Careful (10-Mar) : Meh....I hope we can get Ward 49ers or Murphy Vikings
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.