wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Clay Matthews' return from injury helped the Green Bay Packers dominate the Chicago Bears offense with his big impact in rushing the passer and helping to stop the run.

He finished the game with a crazy stat-line of two sacks, four tackles for a loss, and two pass defenses in his first game back from the hamstring injury that kept him out of the lineup for four games.

Matthews was especially productive considering he didn't play the full amount of snaps, as the Packers tried to ease him back into game action.

Initially, the Packers struggled to contain the Bears running game and Matt Forte. He rushed for 37 yards on the game's opening drive as the Bears drove down the field with ease. A false start penalty and an incompletion forced a punt. It was nice to force a punt, but it appeared it would be a long day with Forte running wild.

On the second possession, Matthews showed his ability to impact the game in other ways than through rushing the passer. With the game still waiting to be broken open, the Bears had great field position and had been having their way in the run game.

The Bears ran Forte for a 1-yard gain on first down and lined up looking ready to run on second down, needing nine yards for a first down.

B.J. Raji and Matthews got a great burst off the snap and each had a step on their blockers. Both were in great position if the hand-off were to go to Forte.

As the ball got handed off to Forte, Matthews' blocker had already failed at his desperation dive, leaving one Bears lineman, J'Marcus Webb, to deal with both Raji and Matthews. That's probably the best scenario the Packers could ask for on a given play.

As Raji got past Webb, Matthews gave a little nudge to ensure Webb was unable to recover to make the block.

Matthews then immediately bolted for Forte and finished the play as Raji can't bring down Forte. The loss of four yards turned a manageable down-and-distance into third-and-long. The Bears couldn't convert and the Packers were able to get the ball and take back some ground in the early battle for field position.

On the next drive, Matthews showed his vital impact in the pass rush with the same type of playmaking ability that ended a Chicago attack. His sack of Jay Cutler on third down forced another Bears punt.

Later in the game, Matthews got his second sack on a play that helped the Packers keep the Bears at a distance.

After an offensive pass interference penalty on Alshon Jeffery and a 3-yard gain by Forte, the Bears faced a second-and-long situation.

They lined up in an obvious passing formation with nobody in the backfield alongside Jay Cutler. The Packers lined up with Raji and Mike Daniels as the only down linemen and Matthews and Dezman Moses as outside backers.

The Packers ran a stunt with Matthews coming over the top of Raji and attacking the middle of the Bears offensive line as both linemen, Matthews and Moses, rush the passer.

As Matthews got over the top, two Bears blocked Raji, two blocked Daniels and one blocked Moses, leaving Matthews a free run at Cutler.

Matthews makes the Bears pay for their offensive line miscue by sacking Jay Cutler and forcing an insurmountable distance to gain on third down. The Bears line was so focused on Raji and Matthews coming from the left side, that when Matthews got towards the middle, the Bears were out of position.

The attention Matthews is able to draw allows the Packers to be much more creative in getting him and other players opportunities to find holes on the line.

If you look at the picture above, Matthews' ability to get to the quarterback not only resulted in a negative play for the Bears, but prevented a big positive one. Alshon Jeffery was able to get a step on Sam Shields and would have been open for a big-play opportunity if Cutler had had time to get the ball out of his hands.

Matthews' presence on the field was a huge factor in the Packers' ability to dominate the Bears offense both by stopping the run and rushing the passer. He consistently made big plays that ended Bears drives and kept points off the board.

With his ability to rush the passer individually and help others on the line get better matchups, Matthews also takes pressure off the secondary. This was the case when Shields was beaten by Jeffery, but Cutler was sacked.

This is the case not only on plays ending in sacks, but throughout the game as Cutler was having to throw quickly or worrying about locating Matthews and the rest of the pass rush.

Matthews being back in the lineup allows the Packers defense to get much more creative. The group has a chance to really get into a nice stride down the stretch. With a more balanced attack offensively, the Packers could be set for a long playoff run with the Matthews-led defense playing well.



the photos that go along with the narrative are at the bleacher report site. 

UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Now you people see why I say sacks are so important?

Let's do a repeat of what I said before.
2010 - we win the SB with 47 sacks
2011 - we go one and done with 29 sacks
2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Sacks more often than not end drives. [boxing]

A nice breakdown of CM3's performance that game. Yes, he helped us shut down da Bears big time.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Now you people see why I say sacks are so important?

Let's do a repeat of what I said before.
2010 - we win the SB with 47 sacks
2011 - we go one and done with 29 sacks
2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Sacks more often than not end drives. [boxing]

A nice breakdown of CM3's performance that game. Yes, he helped us shut down da Bears big time.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Sacks are important but not all sacks are equal.
A sack for a 1 yard loss on first down is a whole lot different than a 7 yard loss on 3rd down.
UserPostedImage
coltonja
12 years ago

2012 - we already have 39 sacks. I don't see us winning it all this year (but we'll win it next year when we get 50 sacks)

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Hey, zombie, I have a question for you. I was thinking about our season at work tonight and comparing it to the feeling of the 2010 team going into and early in the playoffs. I felt in 2010 that we would go all the way, whereas this season I see us winning one and then being out. But it was just a feeling, and I don't put much stock in feelings when it comes to most things yet I seem unable to shake it.

Anyway, I enjoy your insight here at PH and was wondering why you felt this way too?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to pack93z for the sig!!!
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Hey, zombie, I have a question for you. I was thinking about our season at work tonight and comparing it to the feeling of the 2010 team going into and early in the playoffs. I felt in 2010 that we would go all the way, whereas this season I see us winning one and then being out. But it was just a feeling, and I don't put much stock in feelings when it comes to most things yet I seem unable to shake it.

Anyway, I enjoy your insight here at PH and was wondering why you felt this way too?

Originally Posted by: coltonja 



We didn't have the D we did in 2010. It all fell apart in 2011. 🇦🇷 carried that team on his back. It will take 🇹🇹 two years to rebuild that joke of a D (2011's). 2012 is the first year. 🇹🇹 went all out D. In 2013, he'll go D again but sprinkle in a little OL. I think 2013 we'll have a better shot at winning it all.

And yes, 2010 I felt like we'd win it all. I had that feeling in 1996, 2003, and 2010. Of those 3 years, I was only wrong once. (I didn't have that feeling in 1997 as that year, we seemed like we were missing the chip on our shoulder and didn't have the Cows to piss us off).

We're definitely hungry in 2012 and have a chip on our shoulder. I'd take the 2012 team > 2011. But I think our injuries this year were worse than 2010. Our OL scares me.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (2h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (2h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.