dfosterf
12 years ago
We have the discount double-check.

Get back to work, media/$$/houndassholes.

RaiderPride
12 years ago
WOW!

What a great thread.

I love reading this stuff. It is food for the mind.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
macbob
12 years ago

That's because we had big leads.

When you have the lead, as we did in most of 2011, you can run. We pretty much dominated most games in regular season last year.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Zombie-When we went through this discussion before, we had Packers stats going back to 1992 looking at the running game. 1st 3 quarters were basically equal in rush attempts, the 4th quarter there was a spike up--2 rushes on average more than the rush attempts in quarters 1-3. So yes, there was a spike up from having a lead and running it to run out the clock, but it was statistically insignificant. It was around a 3% spike.

We also had analysis of when the Packers were within 7 pts, either ahead, tied, or behind, and the #s were the same--the running percent was in the 40s. These were close games, not games when we were blowing out the opponent.

Go back and look at the threads. Next post will have the stats from last season.
macbob
12 years ago

That's because we had big leads.

When you have the lead, as we did in most of 2011, you can run. We pretty much dominated most games in regular season last year.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



OK. 2011 regular season stats, source ESPN.com

Packers....Ahead by 9+...by 1-8...tied...down by 1-8...down by 9+
Pass........69..................199.....60.......111...........38
Run.........65.................131.....24........72...........14

...........+9............+ 1-8....Tied.....-1-8.........-9+
P/R %....51/49......60/40...71/29....60/40........73/27

Totals
within +/- 8 = 370/227 = 61/39%
overall = 537/330 = 61/39%

So, last year when we were 15-1 in the regular season and pretty much dominant in most games, when the games were close (within 😎 we basically maintained a 60/40% split.

I expected the spike up when behind by two scores, and the spike down when ahead by two scores.

Two things surprised me--McCarthy spiked up on Pass calls when we were tied, and he didn't when we were behind by 1-8. The down 1-8 percentage was the same as the up by 1-8 percentage. In any event, feel free to keep calling for a 60/40% pass/run split. I'm good with that, too, Zombie.
play2win
12 years ago
macbob, our numbers look nothing like that this year. That's for sure. Had they been more balanced, we probably wouldn't be having this discussion, standing at 3-0 or 2-1.

I think we are around 70-30 so far this season. Take away the Bear game, and we're more like 80-20.

The bigger point in all of this, and I tried making a case for this around draft time, is that teams have had plenty of time to figure us out. No more back shoulder throws for big gains because their DBs are sitting on those. Safeties over the top. Pass rush full on, knowing we are not going to run.

All the more reason for the team offensive philosophy to shift, become more run oriented, and force the change on the opponent as opposed to the inverse. Many teams loaded pass rush in their front 7s. Those are faster, yet lighter players who tend to wear out when they get continually pounded on having to fight off run blocking.

This year, we ought to be forcing the run on any team we meet. Improve upon it in all phases. That will open up all the other great pass plays we have in our arsenal. All of those great plays won't work as effectively if we don't run. Pretty simple stuff.
nyrpack
12 years ago
comes down to our o- line, have not been doing the job for several yrs. now !!
jimmy b.
Packfan87
12 years ago
I love what Benson's doing for us, but every time he touches the ball I hold my breathe for a fumble. Maybe that's not fair, but we can't have turnovers especially from our ground game.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
PackerTraxx
12 years ago

comes down to our o- line, have not been doing the job for several yrs. now !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack 



...since the Super Bowl.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
macbob
12 years ago

This year, we ought to be forcing the run on any team we meet. Improve upon it in all phases. That will open up all the other great pass plays we have in our arsenal. All of those great plays won't work as effectively if we don't run. Pretty simple stuff.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



Agreed. Don't be one dimensional. At the same time, as Zombie points out, the rules have been adjusted to favor the passing game. We'd be foolish not to exploit that.

I don't want to see us become a run-oriented team, I would just like a little more balance in the attack than we've shown this year (last year was great). Looking at the WCO of the 49ers in their heyday, and the Packers of the 90s, they both averaged around a Pass/Run ration of 58%/42%.

A more-balanced attack helps our passing game by slowing down the pass rush as the DL has to account for a possible running play; tiring the DLine, improving our Offense all around later in the game; forcing the LB/DBs to honor the run threat of a play-action pass, helping our WRs get open easier, etc.

zombieslayer
12 years ago

OK. 2011 regular season stats, source ESPN.com

Packers....Ahead by 9+...by 1-8...tied...down by 1-8...down by 9+
Pass........69..................199.....60.......111...........38
Run.........65.................131.....24........72...........14

...........+9............+ 1-8....Tied.....-1-8.........-9+
P/R %....51/49......60/40...71/29....60/40........73/27

Totals
within +/- 8 = 370/227 = 61/39%
overall = 537/330 = 61/39%

So, last year when we were 15-1 in the regular season and pretty much dominant in most games, when the games were close (within 😎 we basically maintained a 60/40% split.

I expected the spike up when behind by two scores, and the spike down when ahead by two scores.

Two things surprised me--McCarthy spiked up on Pass calls when we were tied, and he didn't when we were behind by 1-8. The down 1-8 percentage was the same as the up by 1-8 percentage. In any event, feel free to keep calling for a 60/40% pass/run split. I'm good with that, too, Zombie.

Originally Posted by: macbob 



Agreed. That looks about right.

61/39 is good when you have the OL. We may have to go 55/45 with this joke of an OL.

2011 OL for some reason was lightyears ahead of 2012's.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (18h) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Great throw by Hurts
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
beast (10-Feb) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
beast (10-Feb) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : wtf Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : oh fuck me i messed that up
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Carter was 9th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : another crap halftime show
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.