Stats don't bear out the What Favre brought to the field.
"Cheesey" wrote:
Your argument sounds compelling at first blush, except it fails utterly to explain either the 2005 seasons (4-12) or the 2006 season (8-8). Where was Favre's mystical influence those years?
Oh, wait, what's that I hear? It was all the defense's fault those years?
Figures.
In the face of empirical facts, your argument falls flat on its face.
"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:
I agree.
We keep hearing how the almighty Favre would have willed this team to a better record this year.
Heres a fact:
Through today, the Jets have scored 354 points on offense.
The Packers have scored 355.
That means that Rodgers has lead the Packers to ONE MORE point then Favre has lead the Jets.
Now look at defense.
The jets have allowed 292 points
The Packers defense has allowed 319
The Jets have given up 27 less points on defense.
Take that 27 points and divide it up amongst our losses, and we'd easily be on top of the division.
Favre doesn't play defense, does he????
But keep saying that garbage..........even though it has NO truth in it.
"obi1" wrote: