packedhouse02
16 years ago
You hear Packer players saying we are what we are and our record is who we are. For the past two year and half years, I've looked at Mike McCarthy and was duly impressed with his coaching staff. I thought he had really coached his team up and that their record was better than the talent because they were so well coached. This year I don't see that same high level of coaching. I see a team making mistake upon mistake and missing assignments all over the place. Certainly that isn't a sign of good coaching.

I've heard the discussion about how injured we are, but even before Barnett went down, he wasn't playing very well. Both Tauscher and Clifton along with the rest of the entire line has struggled mightily. So what has happened to this team? Are we really this bad?
blank
bozz_2006
16 years ago
uh, yes. we are who we thought we were.
UserPostedImage
macbob
16 years ago

You hear Packer players saying we are what we are and our record is who we are. For the past two year and half years, I've looked at Mike McCarthy and was duly impressed with his coaching staff. I thought he had really coached his team up and that their record was better than the talent because they were so well coached. This year I don't see that same high level of coaching. I see a team making mistake upon mistake and missing assignments all over the place. Certainly that isn't a sign of good coaching.

I've heard the discussion about how injured we are, but even before Barnett went down, he wasn't playing very well. Both Tauscher and Clifton along with the rest of the entire line has struggled mightily. So what has happened to this team? Are we really this bad?

"packedhouse02" wrote:



I don't think we're as bad as our record. Just look at our points for/points against.

Last year, in our first seven games 6 were decided by a touchdown or less, and we were 5-1 in those games. This year, we're 1-5 in games decided by a touchdown or less. That's the main difference.

If we had gone 1-5 last year in close games, we would have been 2-5 instead of 6-1 after seven games. That whole season would have gone differently. If we had the same record this year (5-1) in close games we'd be sitting at 9-4 right now.

What we have is a very young team--led by a young quarterback--that is inconsistent and hasn't figured out how to finish out a game yet.

The defense has been a lot worse than I expected, and (in my opinion) a lot of that falls to the coaches and defensive schemes.

We're essentially one play/stop in each game away. But we didn't/couldn't make the play/stop in any of those games. And that says a lot about the youth and about the coaches preparing the players.
obi1
16 years ago
We are seeing the... shall I say it? Brett Favre difference. What he meant to this team last year is on showcase here.

I know I am going to hear the no comparison, sick of the subject, etc. BUT, fact of the matter is that the Favre factor was more than just throwing TDs. The whole team knew they were playing with a living legend on their team. Favre's affect on the team went WELL beyond the TD passes and the ability to bounce back from the tough hits.

We are seeing it now. The same team that learned to win with Favre at the helm last year are losing the same kind of games this year.

Don't give me this crap about the stats bearing out different facts.

Stats don't bear out the What Favre brought to the field.

Rodgers is a good QB but is still learning to be a great one. Packers season is all but over and Packers have been embarrassed in ways they NEVER were last year.

YES Packers defense stinks and the team is hurt in several key positions but Packers were missing players last year also. As matter of fact, Grant didn't even come to play until the mid-season.

Packers are capable of winning the next three games and salvaging an 8-8 season. They are also just as capable of laying an egg the next three games as they have proven in the last 3 games.

This team is suffering the pains of losing their team leader, the one everyone took pride in, and the definitive driving force of the team from the last several years.

It is sad. I am one to move on from the saga that was Brett Favre but this is the aftereffects of a season in which Favre played his guts out and drove the team to do the same and his disappearnce from the team that he defined.

I hope the Packers win out the rest of the season for pride sakes. But the truth is the truth and it hurts right now.

I am NOT saying we should have kept Favre, merely that we should have expected this.

Go ahead, rip me apart.
blank
dingus
16 years ago
Embarrassed in ways they never were last year?

The BF portion of the Dallas game, both losses to the Bears?

We've been blown out once this year, New Orleans. A couple of different bounces and we'd have a completely different record.

I'm not saying that we're a great Football team but we've held our own against great teams this season.

I didn't know what to expect this season, I think next year will be a whole different ballgame.
blank
obi1
16 years ago

Embarrassed in ways they never were last year?

The Brett Favre portion of the Dallas game, both losses to the Bears?

We've been blown out once this year, New Orleans. A couple of different bounces and we'd have a completely different record.

I'm not saying that we're a great Football team but we've held our own against great teams this season.

I didn't know what to expect this season, I think next year will be a whole different ballgame.

"dingus" wrote:



Losing to the Cowboys was NOT an embarassment. IT was expected. Were they NOT the first seed last year?

A mediocre Saints team BLEW us out this year.
blank
longtimefan
16 years ago



YES Packers defense stinks and the team is hurt in several key positions but Packers were missing players last year also.

"obi1" wrote:



1st off give us the starting D players from last year, then put the ones from this year..

Let us really see how much different this D is?

Then after that look at this

For 16 games last year

D last year gave up 1597 yards rushing

4.1 per carry

13 tds

they gave up 20+ yards 20 times

40+ yards 4 times

~~~~~~~~~~~~

So far this year

1841 yards ( over 16 games that 2265 yards )

4.8 yards per carry

17 td ( over 16 games thats almost 20 tds )

Gave up 20 + yards 14 times

Gave up 40+ yards 4 times

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Our D compared to last year SUCKS

Brett would not have made Harrell, Montgomery, Bishop play any better and btw those were starters last week or played lot more then they should have\


So stop with the Brett would have made the D better thats BULLSHIT

Maybe the offense could have played a notch better but IMO that would have only been one more win, vs Tampa
djcubez
16 years ago

You hear Packer players saying we are what we are and our record is who we are. For the past two year and half years, I've looked at Mike McCarthy and was duly impressed with his coaching staff. I thought he had really coached his team up and that their record was better than the talent because they were so well coached. This year I don't see that same high level of coaching. I see a team making mistake upon mistake and missing assignments all over the place. Certainly that isn't a sign of good coaching.

I've heard the discussion about how injured we are, but even before Barnett went down, he wasn't playing very well. Both Tauscher and Clifton along with the rest of the entire line has struggled mightily. So what has happened to this team? Are we really this bad?

"macbob" wrote:



I don't think we're as bad as our record. Just look at our points for/points against.

Last year, in our first seven games 6 were decided by a touchdown or less, and we were 5-1 in those games. This year, we're 1-5 in games decided by a touchdown or less. That's the main difference.

If we had gone 1-5 last year in close games, we would have been 2-5 instead of 6-1 after seven games. That whole season would have gone differently. If we had the same record this year (5-1) in close games we'd be sitting at 9-4 right now.

What we have is a very young team--led by a young quarterback--that is inconsistent and hasn't figured out how to finish out a game yet.

The defense has been a lot worse than I expected, and (in my opinion) a lot of that falls to the coaches and defensive schemes.

We're essentially one play/stop in each game away. But we didn't/couldn't make the play/stop in any of those games. And that says a lot about the youth and about the coaches preparing the players.

"packedhouse02" wrote:



I agree a lot with this post. Pretty much all of it in fact. A lot of stupid mistakes/blown plays are a factor, as well as youth, coaching, injuries, etc..

However, obi1 brings a valid point. While I don't see us being a better team with Favre on the roster, I do believe that we have been seeing a lot less fire from our players. That extra bit of aggression that gives players a push. The one that the Giants had last year in the playoffs, or the tenacity that a player like Merriman/Haynesworth/Ray Lewis brings. I agree to the point that we lost a leader on our team, and we've struggled to replace their presence. Rodger's is in his first season as a starer so we can't expect too much, but no veteran has really stepped up to the plate. We don't have a fiery player that gets us pumped up and I think if we got one our team would play different.
greenwhiteandnogold
16 years ago


We are seeing the... shall I say it? Brett Favre difference. What he meant to this team last year is on showcase here........

"obl1" wrote:



bravo! I couldn't have said it better myself. +1
blank
brnt247
16 years ago
I'm just going to copy my post from a basically unread thread.

No, we aren't this bad. We have the talent, but we haven't had our starting 11 on D the whole year. Bigby and Harris were injured earlier, and that effected our run defense, and Jenkins and Barnett are out for the year which effects both run and pass defense heavily. There's nobody getting a pass rush outside of Kampman and although Chillar and Poppinga are solid linebackers, they aren't the stud linebackers that a team with a weak DLine can survive with.

I would never ever call this a bad team though. We have had opportunities to beat the Titans, Bucs, and Panthers who are all 10 win teams. Bad teams don't compete with these teams week in and week out. We won't make the playoffs this season, but we are in no way in a spiral downward.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (46m) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (14h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (14h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.