I guess he didn't receive offers due to his age and prior injuries. I was thinking he had problems with the Oakland coaching staff. It was he and Mike that clashed. Looks like it was a the chip on his shoulders because he didn't want to play in GB.


link 



I did see where he was calling out the Oakland coach back in 2003. Perhaps this was in the back of my mind. Not that I blame him. Team leaders have to lead.



link 

Originally Posted by: wpr 

i dont remember any of this. where the hell was i?

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 

I’ve heard all the reports about moving to safety and all this, but I don’t think there’s any more I can do on the football field than I already do. I think the only thing that would ever change is just the title, from being a corner to a safety. But I’m a football player. I can do anything on that football field and they can put me anywhere. And they know that. All the talk about, ‘Can he play safety?’ I kind of already play safety. So it wouldn’t be that big of a jump.

Charles Woodson 22 May 2012 wrote:

That last quote is right on. Woodson plays something like 5 or 6 positions on D. The only thing that would change would be the title.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

I do agree that Woodson is a versatile asset and he'll play multiple positions, including safety. However, responsibilities could change in certain packages. The base defense is one of them and I read Dom Capers wants to play more base this season.

Also, who steps up? If Casey Heyward and Sam Shields do, Woodson may play safety in the nickel rather than slot corner. If Anthony Levine emerges, Woodson is more likely to remain at corner regardless of the package.

Originally Posted by: porky88 

Don't forget McMillian, although it's not smart to count on a rookie 4th rounder, who knows...maybe we get lucky.

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx