Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

Ah yes. Forgot Manning broke it in '04 before Brady broke it.

So, who breaks Brady's - Brees or 🇦🇷? Even though I think 🇦🇷 is the better QB, 🇲🇲 is more likely to rest 🇦🇷 than Peyton is to rest Brees so I think it's more likely Brees.

🇦🇷 is at 45 right now and I doubt 🇦🇷 even walks into the field in the 2nd half. Brees is at 41 so this year is out of the question.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 


Peyton lost 3 key players at Safety, TE and RB by not getting them off the field for a meaningless game last year. Then they lost to Seattle.

I doubt they will risk anything this week. Just to run up the score again to get another record.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
dhazer
12 years ago
The Saints are playing for something and the Packers are not. The true MVP this year should actually be Peyton manthing, look how shitty the Colts have been without him lol. I think Rodgers gets it in a very close 3 way battle.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Porforis
12 years ago

The Saints are playing for something and the Packers are not. The true MVP this year should actually be Peyton manthing, look how shitty the Colts have been without him lol. I think Rodgers gets it in a very close 3 way battle.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Because clearly the Colts haven't regressed significantly in any other category.
zombieslayer
12 years ago

The Saints are playing for something and the Packers are not. The true MVP this year should actually be Peyton manthing, look how shitty the Colts have been without him lol. I think Rodgers gets it in a very close 3 way battle.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



OK Michael Silver. You can log out of dhazer's account now.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago
I did some quick math

Rodgers completion % (68.3%) + Packers drop %(8%) - Saints drop %(4%) = adjusted completion % (73.3%)

This is what Rodgers completion % would be if we only had the same percentage of drops as the Saints

Rodgers adjusted completion % (72.3%) * Brees' attempts (622) = adjusted completions (450 completions)

This is what Rodgers completions Rodgers would have if he threw as often as Brees and the WRs dropped as few as the Saints.

Rodgers average per completion (13.4 yards) * adjusted commpletions (450) = adjusted yards (6030 yards)

This is how many yards Rodgers would have if he had as many attempts as Brees and had as few dropped passes.

Rodgers TD/Completions (12.4%) * Rodgers' adjusted completions (450) = adjusted TDs (56 TDs)

This is how many TDs Rodgers would have if he threw as often and had as few drops.

Rodgers' INT/completion (1.75%) * Rodgers' adjusted completions (450) = adjusted INTs (8 INTs)

This is how many INTs Rodgers would have if he threw as often and had as few drops as Brees.

Summary:
If Rodgers had as many attempts as Brees and as few drops he would be

450 comp of 622 attempts for 6030 yards with 56 TDs 8 picks and 72.3% completions.

In 15 games.

That isn't even counting the Saints playing in domes 12 times.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Stevetarded
12 years ago

The Saints are playing for something and the Packers are not. The true MVP this year should actually be Peyton manthing, look how shitty the Colts have been without him lol. I think Rodgers gets it in a very close 3 way battle.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 




Peyton has taken 26 million dollars from the Colts this year and hasn't taken a snap. Wouldn't that make him the least valuable?
blank
gbguy20
12 years ago

Peyton has taken 26 million dollars from the Colts this year and hasn't taken a snap. Wouldn't that make him the least valuable?

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded 




This is on the right track.

Using the argument that Peyton should be MVP because his team is complete garbage without him should be offset because if it wasn't for his outrageous contract then they could actually afford a supporting cast to make his team less awful.

long sentence with minimal punctuation was pretty awesome hope u still get the idea
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
nerdmann
12 years ago

This is on the right track.

Using the argument that Peyton should be MVP because his team is complete garbage without him should be offset because if it wasn't for his outrageous contract then they could actually afford a supporting cast to make his team less awful.

long sentence with minimal punctuation was pretty awesome hope u still get the idea

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 


He's "pulling a Favre," inasmuch as he wouldn't let them have a viable backup. Favre was all about "just let me compete" that year, but damn. When Ted Thompson drafted Arodge, Favre sure didn't like having that guy behind him.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

He's "pulling a Favre," inasmuch as he wouldn't let them have a viable backup. Favre was all about "just let me compete" that year, but damn. When Ted Thompson drafted Arodge, Favre sure didn't like having that guy behind him.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


Brett's biggest fear was being replaced. That's why he always went back in even if he was hurt. He didn't want what happened to Don Majkowski to happen to him.
UserPostedImage
RedSoxExcel
12 years ago



Summary:
If Rodgers had as many attempts as Brees and as few drops he would be

450 comp of 622 attempts for 6030 yards with 56 TDs 8 picks and 72.3% completions.

In 15 games.

That isn't even counting the Saints playing in domes 12 times.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



If Brees had Colston for a couple of more games, he gets a 100 more yards, etc. Where does it stop? I think there are a lot of HUGE assumptions in that analysis. May be with more pass attempts, Rodgers gets sacked more and gets hurt, who knows. What happened, happened, you can't discredit Brees's season IMO.

I think Brees record is BS because of passing statistics these days (including QB ratings) but he is still having an awesome season. I think its insane if Rodgers does not win in a romp due to the Dome thing but honestly I don't think NFL voters factor that stuff in (and arguably may be they should not as you can't punish someone for playing a Dome). I think Brees is have a world class season and I am not going to take anything away from that but I think its not even close - Rodgers in a romp. If Rodgers didn't have the Bears game and went 200 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT or something, its much closer but I think after the Bears game, its OVER.
blank
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (1m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (2m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (2m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (3m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (4m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (7m) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (11m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (12m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (13m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (22m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (28m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (30m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (31m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (33m) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (42m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (48m) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (51m) : Packers will get in
    beast (52m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (57m) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (58m) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (3h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (3h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (3h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (13h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
    beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
    Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
    beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
    packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
    beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
    Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
    wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
    beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
    beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
    Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
    Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
    Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
    Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.