Week 13 Playoff Positions· Page 2

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

Teams have been getting good yards up the middle even with A.J. Hawk. I'm not discrediting Hawk, just stating the obvious here.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

We're 13th against the run this year. We looked really bad against the Giants yesterday.

As for TE coverage up the middle, I'd agree with you.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#12

We're 13th against the run this year. We looked really bad against the Giants yesterday.

As for TE coverage up the middle, I'd agree with you.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

13th in points or yards? Because remember, yards don't mean anything. ;)

I wonder if the fact that the Packers have a high powered offense has any merit on teams going away from the run against the Packers? Nah, that can't be it! Against mediocre and better RB's, the Packers have problems stopping them.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#13

Teams have been getting good yards up the middle even with A.J. Hawk. I'm not discrediting Hawk, just stating the obvious here.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I think Bishop has more to do with stuffing runs than Hawk anyway. Hawk has been having an average season at best this year. He should be able to perform better than he is, and that's not expecting him to be an elite player either.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Good point.

Yeah, we're probably good against the run because teams are forced to stop running and throw to keep up with us so it's a negligible stat.

So scratch that last thought. 🤔

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#15

Good point.

Yeah, we're probably good against the run because teams are forced to stop running and throw to keep up with us so it's a negligible stat.

So scratch that last thought. 🤔

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Thing is, are there any good running teams entering the playoffs?

I know Frank Gore is pretty solid and the Saints have a decent backfield for sure. Anyone else?

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#16

If I'm not mistaken, doesn't another victory clinch the No. 2 seed for the Packers? At that point, the worst they could finish would be 13-3. The best the 49ers can finish is 14-2, which would give them the No. 1 seed, while the best the Saints can finish is 13-3, but the Packers hold the head-to-head tiebreaker over them.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#17

If I'm not mistaken, doesn't another victory clinch the No. 2 seed for the Packers?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

What are the top 5 NFC team records?
Packers 12 - 0
49ers 10 - 2

...

I read they have the 3rd seed wrapped up.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#18

Ugh, the Submit button didn't work again. I fleshed out my last post but it hadn't posted by the time you replied. My question might make more sense now.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#19

Ugh, the Submit button didn't work again. I fleshed out my last post but it hadn't posted by the time you replied. My question might make more sense now.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Stupid software!!! I hate this website! The Post button sometimes just laughs at me when I click it. I'm gonna punch the admin in the ding ding.

If it is straight up head to head, then yeah, you're right. Packers win, they get a BYE in the playoffs.

GermanGilbert
Member

13 years ago

#20

If it is straight up head to head, then yeah, you're right. Packers win, they get a BYE in the playoffs.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

If it's a 3-way tie with San Francisco at 13-3, the Packers get the nod over the Saints based on the Conference record. The Saints lost all their 3 games against NFC teams. So one more win will clinch the bye.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (9h) : don't care

Zero2Cool (14h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (23h) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24