What's wrong with Gay marriage?· Page 18

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

There is no truly logical opinion on how gay marriage should be disallowed. Only religious reasons exist, other reasons are purely idiotic. Refer to Rockmolder's post on page 1 for why.

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland

Refer to page kiss my ass.

But yea, there's apparently nothing further to debate on the subject. It's cut and dry and that's why it's a perfect world. :-"

Cheesey
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#172

Might as well allow marriages to trees. I mean, what's the argument against that?
Then, if your "wife" gets "dutch elms disease" and dies, you can collect life insurance......(AND have a winter's worth of firewood!)

I guess what it comes down to is, where do you draw the line? Seriously. What one person considers "normal", you may look at and say "WOW! That guys is CRAZY!"
(You know....like many of you feel about me.)

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#173

If someone wants to be enough of an idiot to call a tree his wife, I don't see why I should stand in his way. Why should marriage be a matter of allowed vs. disallowed? The only reason to disallow marriage is to preserve certain privileges and benefits of marriage, which I don't think should accrue to married people anyway.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#174

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

I've always respected your religious view, but now you're comparing same sex marriage to a human being marrying a tree? That's awfully low Alan. I'm not sure if you're trying to be funny or not, hope you are.

You draw the line at HUMANS, it's not that complicated to understand this concept. If you are a HUMAN you should have the RIGHT to marry any other HUMAN. Very basic concept.

Besides, if you marry a tree, what's to say when one leaves?

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#175

Isn't the religious right's view on gay people kind of fucked up in the first place? There's actually scientific proof that the area of Soddom and Gomorrha being leveled by a small asteroid or comet and not some wrath of God as the old testament would have you believe. And even those scriptures were misconstrued. God wasn't condeming men lying down with men, he was condeming the wickedness of city life versus the more righteous life that Lot had previously led out in the rural area.

Anyway the stories of 2500 hundred years ago, should probably be to rest now as we venture forward into the 21st century. People can still believe what they want but our government was suppose to have separation from religion, but obviously we are not following what our founding fathers wanted.

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#176

Besides, if you marry a tree, what's to say when one leaves?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Why don't you just make like a tree and get out of here.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#177

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#178

If you are a HUMAN you should have the RIGHT to marry any other HUMAN. Very basic concept.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Any other human who is capable of consent, anyway.

A tree is obviously not capable of consenting to marriage.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#179

Any other human who is capable of consent, anyway.

A tree is obviously not capable of consenting to marriage.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

I've never met a tree that said no ...

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#180

Any other human who is capable of consent, anyway.

A tree is obviously not capable of consenting to marriage.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Where do dryads fit into this? Can I marry a dryad?

(not that I'd want to, just asking)

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (3h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (4h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (10h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (11h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (18h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS