James Jones Agrees to new deal· Page 7

azrunning
Guest

13 years ago

I don't think Cobb will replace Driver or Jones. He was drafted to improve our receiving corps. In that respect he was drafted to replace Swain. Now, the best corps in the NFL last year got even better.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#62

Originally Posted by: azrunning

In addition.. I think this year his feature aspect of involvement will be special teams and "gimmick" type wrinkles to the offense.

Rule of thumb for receivers as to when the "lights go on" is year two to three.. projecting forward that is right about the end of Drivers self projection, Jones new contract and Nelson's contract.

I would compare it to quantity of draft picks.. the more options you give yourself, the better overall chance that you land difference makers.

Having Jones return gives the Packers options moving forward.. with a high level of talent loaded in those options.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#63

As much as the drops drove me crazy, I don't think any play was as crazy as Jennings passing the ball backwards to the Lion's defender in that one game. That created quite a domino effect.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

cooolbeans08
Registered

13 years ago

#64

Nothing on the numbers yet?

Weird that it's taking so long for those to come out, isn't it?

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#65

Nothing on the numbers yet?

Weird that it's taking so long for those to come out, isn't it?

Originally Posted by: cooolbeans08

You want numbers? HUH? YOU WANT NUMBERS!!!

3 years.

There, you got your number(s). 😉

I'm guessing it's probably somewhere between 3 years for 9 to 12 million.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#66

Originally Posted by: azrunning

This. (Zero loves it when someone says that)

Methinks Cobb was drafted initially as a returner but also to improve our receiving corps.

I also think next year, Ted will draft yet another WR. 2005 taught us a VERY important lesson, you can NEVER have too many WRs.

I'm too lazy to look this up, but didn't Ted draft a WR every single year? I wouldn't be surprised. I think it's either every single year or every year but one.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#67

You want numbers? HUH? YOU WANT NUMBERS!!!

3 years.

There, you got your number(s). 😉

I'm guessing it's probably somewhere between 3 years for 9 to 12 million.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

You forgot the "You can't handle the numbers" to complete the bit. lol.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

sfalim
Registered

13 years ago

#68

All I gotta say about this is, Jordy is way better than Jones in all aspects. Count on it!

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#69

This. (Zero loves it when someone says that)

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Even though you hit like a 6 yr old girl, punch yourself in the ding ding.

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#70

All I gotta say about this is, Jordy is way better than Jones in all aspects. Count on it!

Originally Posted by: sfalim

The numbers from last season speak otherwise.. that is all I am saying. [grin1]

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (3h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (3h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (5h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (5h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (5h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (5h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (5h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (5h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (5h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (6h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (7h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (7h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (7h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (7h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (7h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (8h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (8h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (8h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (8h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (9h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (9h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (9h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (11h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (11h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (12h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (12h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (12h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (12h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (12h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (12h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (12h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (12h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (12h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (12h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (12h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (12h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (12h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (12h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (12h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (12h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (13h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS