macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
I'm kind of surprised we didn't put any tender offer at all on JJ and BJ. I may be off a year, but I thought they were both 4 year players who would be restricted FAs, with the Packers getting some kind of compensation if they leave. Now they'll be UFAs, with no compensation.

The article didn't discuss Bigby, and mentioned a Browns WR, but the article title wouldn't fit so I modified it.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/05/brandon-jackson-james-jones-chansi-stuckey-among-those-non-tendered/ 

There wont be any transactions in the NFL during the next week, but a few of t weeks moves continue to slowly leak out. Or non-moves in this case.

Heres a quick round-up of notable players we learned were not tendered contracts as restricted free agents, making them unrestricted free agents when the new CBA is reached. (A few other notable non-tenders are right here.)

Packers running back Brandon Jackson: Tom Silverstein of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports the Packers only placed tenders on guard Daryn Colledge, kicker Mason Crosby, and fullback John Kuhn.

Not placing one on third-down back Brandon Jackson is a bit of a surprise because the team is expected to try to bring him back. With that said, Ryan Grant and James Starks are clearly ahead of him in Green Bay.

Packers wide receiver James Jones: Its hard to imagine the Packers paying the type of money it will require to retain Jones. We think someone will give him a nice deal as a potential starter. Safety Atari Bigby was also not tendered a contract.

Browns wide receiver Chansi Stuckey: Non-tendering Stuckey is a bit of a surprise because he led the Browns wide receivers with 40 catches last year. Not placing a tender on him may just be a recognition they dont want to sign Stuckey long-term. The Browns need to get faster on the edges; Stuckey plays the slot.

ProFootballTalk wrote:

Greg C.
13 years ago
No huge surprises. As the article says, it will probably be hard to hold onto Jones. Jackson can probably be had for cheap, though. The reasoning is simple: Jones will be worth more to some other team as a starter than he is to the Packers as the #3 or #4 guy, while Jackson won't be any more than a third down back anywhere, and he's worth more to the Packers because he knows the offense.
blank
13 years ago
1) Don't forget compensatory picks as compensation (if in the CBA).

2) Ted can still sign unrestricted free agents as soon as it is legal to do so.

3) Ted is upgrading the roster.

4) Ted doesn't negotiate scared. He negotiates with balls of steel.
blank
DakotaT
13 years ago
This is just my observation, but from James Jones' body language at the Super Bowl ceremony: I get the feeling he doesn't really like Green Bay. I had very high hopes for him, but he has dropped too many passes for me to consider him a must keep player.

Besides, like his predecessor, Rodgers makes his receivers look a little better than they are.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
13 years ago
Yeah, if we tendered Jones, we wouldn't be able to negotiate, right? Being that he's not "one of our players," we could still sign him. I'm vague on the rules there.
I do think they at least try to sign Jones. He's gonna be the #2 this coming year. Probly Bjack too. Just in case. Can always cut or trade him after TC.
What Nagler said on Ctv was that Jones' agent hadn't returned the call, so it was unknown whether or not they tendered him.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
zombieslayer
13 years ago
I wouldn't cry about losing any of them. B-Jack is a dang good blocker and of the 3, he's the one I'd miss the most. I was a big Jones fan but he keeps dropping TD passes. Unacceptable. Bigby seemed to hit a wall and I don't think he'd ever be a dominant player.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Kingkoopa
13 years ago

This is just my observation, but from James Jones' body language at the Super Bowl ceremony: I get the feeling he doesn't really like Green Bay. I had very high hopes for him, but he has dropped too many passes for me to consider him a must keep player.

Besides, like his predecessor, Rodgers makes his receivers look a little better than they are.

"DakotaT" wrote:



I saw his body language a the ceremony too, but had a different impression. I thought it wasn't because he didn't like GB, but because he felt he let the team down with all his drops in the playoffs, and wasn't really a part of the win. Greg Jennings had to literally call his name for him to join the WR core on stage. JMO, but you could definitely be right.

Personally, I think we need to move on from Jones anyway. He has had way too many drops, and he is no longer dependable. Also, as Greg said, he will no doubt be offered a lot more money from other teams than he would from GB since other teams will see him as a #1 or a #2, whereas GB likely doesn't seem that way. I trust Ted Thompson will find a good sleeper WR in the draft, as he has a great history with picking WRs.

As far as B-jax goes, I'm not surprised we didn't tender him. He is outstanding at blitz pickup, but Starks showed in his limited playing time that he could do a good job at picking up the blitz also. B-jax has shown he isn't a starting RB(at least in our system), but he will be 3rd on our depth chart. Like Jones, a team will overpay for him. The only area we might miss B-jax in is the screen game/receiving game. He has shown the best hands of all our RBs IMO, but at the same time, I have no reason to think Starks can't catch the ball.

As far as Hall, no reason to retain him IMO. John Kuhn is Korey Hall 2.0. He does everything Hall does, but better. Also, Hall has had difficulty staying healthy. The one I'm curious about is QJ. I think his contract has expired also. I haven't heard anything about him yet. I wonder if he will be back?
blank
Greg C.
13 years ago
Quinn just completed the second year of his four-year rookie contract. It's possible that he could get cut, though, as the logjam at fullback continues.
blank
Kingkoopa
13 years ago

Quinn just completed the second year of his four-year rookie contract. It's possible that he could get cut, though, as the logjam at fullback continues.

"Greg C." wrote:



Ah, thanks for that. For some reason I thought his contract was expired.
blank
earthquake
13 years ago
With how Nelson played late, even with the drops he had, I felt like he was coming into the #2/3 spot(With Jones being the 3/4). We've seen steady improvement from Nelson since he got here, whereas Jones actually looked his best in has rookie year. Jones had his best year since his rookie year, but drops too many easy TDs.

I think with how Nelson played in the playoffs, he really solidified himself here in GB. If you think about it, had Nelson caught that 2nd TD in the superbowl, you could have made a good argument that for him being the MVP of that game. He came up big(mostly) when it counted, and I dont think you can say the same about Jones.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
23h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.