dhpackr
14 years ago

If people seriously have gotten to the point that they think the government owes them Viagra pills, we are worse off than I imagined.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Owes?? Its just crazy you can't comprehend these people pay taxes and work for their pay.

So, if a worker had MS, and needed botox shots to treat his symptoms, he should just piss off as well?
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
dhpackr
14 years ago

Be thankful I have a pension to help me when I'm 65...67...whatever it'll be in 20 years... Pay low rates for health insurance, and when my claim for boner pills are denied do what any reasonable person would do and pay out of pocket. But hey, lawsuits fix everything.

"Porforis" wrote:



What pension, what low insurance rates??

Have you been in a cave?

The union made concessions. The rates are changing. This is a completely invalid argument.

You do not think a portion of viagra should be refunded?
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

Owes?? Its just crazy you can't comprehend these people pay taxes and work for their pay.

"dhpackr" wrote:



Yes, owes. Or at least, that's your implication: They pay taxes, so they are entitled to Viagra.

Where did we get the idea that recreational sex is a right? If someone were trying to conceive and were unable to do so due to an erectile deficiency, then maybe I could see insurance paying for it. Maybe. But to force other policyholders to pay for a few guys to get their rocks off makes no sense to me whatsoever.

The funny thing is most of the guys who pop Viagra actually pass the postage stamp test . It's really more of a psychological than a physical problem.

Like I said before, if you can't get it up, get a new girl.
UserPostedImage
dhpackr
14 years ago
I see, so your stance is Erectile dysfunction does not exist, it is not a medical condition.

is alcoholism a disease? drug dependency?
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Wow, do you have fun building straw men and then punching the poor guys down?
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

all of us workers benefit from past union victories.

"IronMan" wrote:


Yes we do. But we don't need unions anymore. We don't need unions to fight for our right to get free Viagra. We don't need unions to fight for our right to drink on the job without getting fired. We don't need unions to back us up if we want to call in sick 30 times a year.

Liberals like protecting lazy people. Thats why they like unions. Unions are right up their alley. Like I said before, unions have outlived their usefullness.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I love the union vs. non-union argument. UPS doesn't TOUCH the bennies that we get at FedEx. Guess which is union? I have a few friends that have worked at UPS and they have said how ridiculous it was working there. One of them tried for 2 years to get fired and didn't because of the union. He said it was unbelievable. He eventually just quit, instead.

I dunno.. I don't have anything against unions when they are in certain industries.. Like many manufacturing plants. I worked at a foundry, and just for health insurance it was over $1k/month for just my wife and I to be covered. Eventually we went with an HSA plan, but even then it was pretty spendy for the coverage (not the actual account). Having a union at that job probably would have been better for the employees.

Behind closed doors, the politics that go on with union companies vs. non-union companies it's pretty crazy. The company where my wife works out of, Honeywell, is a big union company. Because of that they do almost all of their shipping via UPS. She's overheard some of the managers talk about how they refuse to do any major shipping with FedEx because they aren't union. She couldn't believe it.

Anyway, I can see where being a union worker has it's benefits, but I'm certainly glad I don't work for a union company.

That said, I still don't feel sorry for state workers that are going to be affected by this. Especially teachers. While I feel they need to be paid more, they get some benefits that my wife and I certainly can't afford. My wife's sister is a teacher in Appleton (I think), and makes more than my wife does. She gets 3+ weeks off for holidays (spring and Christmas) and gets, what, 9+ weeks off in the summer? So yeah, it has it's advantages. Besides, one doesn't 'stumble' onto a teaching career without having prior knowledge of the pay. These people KNOW they are going to be underpaid.

6 in one hand, half-dozen in the other.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Porforis
14 years ago

I love the union vs. non-union argument. UPS doesn't TOUCH the bennies that we get at FedEx. Guess which is union? I have a few friends that have worked at UPS and they have said how ridiculous it was working there. One of them tried for 2 years to get fired and didn't because of the union. He said it was unbelievable. He eventually just quit, instead.

"Formo" wrote:



I also have former co-workers and a friend that worked at UPS. I can't speak for the way the unions worked because they never mentioned anything about it to me, I just know that they thought the place was a complete shithole.
longtimefan
14 years ago

I see, so your stance is Erectile dysfunction does not exist, it is not a medical condition.

is alcoholism a disease? drug dependency?

"dhpackr" wrote:




You just pick and choose what to see?

NSD said why should an insurance company pay for a man to get a hard on??

UNLESS he is trying to make a baby, then he really shouldnt ask insurance to pay for it

Now, dont take that statement from me to say I support NSD or I dont agree with not paying for the pills, or anything

Just pointing out what NSD said
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
I have no problem with unions.

I have a serious problem with taxes.

If people want to combine to get more bargaining power, that's just fine with me. If once combined, they want to try to use that bargaining power to get bigger and bigger slices of the pie they share with their employers and their employers' customers, that's fine with me, too.

I don't think fighting over pies is a sound business model, but that's neither here nor there. What other people do with their pies is their choice to make, not mine. Union, no union, labor unrest, no labor unrest, blah blah blah. If people want to make their sandbox a war zone, fine with me. It's their sandbox.

What I object to is them fighting over a pie that neither of the sides pay for. I don't believe people are entitled to take tax dollars just because they want bigger slices of pie.

Oh, yes, since someone asked this, albeit rhetorically, I do favor tax cuts for "the rich". Their money is neither mine nor yours. We aren't entitled to it, any more than we're entitled to the money of the poor.

I'd rather be richer than I am. But just because people like Paris Hilton or Donald Trump or the last lottery winner lucked into having a crapload more wealth than me without "working" for it, doesn't mean I'm entitled to share their wealth.

If they want to spend their unearned wealth on trivial stuff, on hundred-dollar Italian underwear and silk toilet paper and solid gold doorknobs...well, that may be all sorts of disgusting to me. But its still their wealth.

And if they want to turn around and pay their employees minimum wage, well, yes, they're scumbags as well as frivolous twits.

But it is still their wealth. Not mine. Not yours.

Just because we're in the majority, and the rich scumbag frivolous twits are in the minority, doesn't make their wealth ours to take.

The problem is not that politicians cut taxes to the rich too much. The only problem is that there is not a politician alive who is willing to make big enough tax cuts.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Formo
14 years ago

I have no problem with unions.

I have a serious problem with taxes.

If people want to combine to get more bargaining power, that's just fine with me. If once combined, they want to try to use that bargaining power to get bigger and bigger slices of the pie they share with their employers and their employers' customers, that's fine with me, too.

I don't think fighting over pies is a sound business model, but that's neither here nor there. What other people do with their pies is their choice to make, not mine. Union, no union, labor unrest, no labor unrest, blah blah blah. If people want to make their sandbox a war zone, fine with me. It's their sandbox.

What I object to is them fighting over a pie that neither of the sides pay for. I don't believe people are entitled to take tax dollars just because they want bigger slices of pie.

Oh, yes, since someone asked this, albeit rhetorically, I do favor tax cuts for "the rich". Their money is neither mine nor yours. We aren't entitled to it, any more than we're entitled to the money of the poor.

I'd rather be richer than I am. But just because people like Paris Hilton or Donald Trump or the last lottery winner lucked into having a crapload more wealth than me without "working" for it, doesn't mean I'm entitled to share their wealth.

If they want to spend their unearned wealth on trivial stuff, on hundred-dollar Italian underwear and silk toilet paper and solid gold doorknobs...well, that may be all sorts of disgusting to me. But its still their wealth.

And if they want to turn around and pay their employees minimum wage, well, yes, they're scumbags as well as frivolous twits.

But it is still their wealth. Not mine. Not yours.

Just because we're in the majority, and the rich scumbag frivolous twits are in the minority, doesn't make their wealth ours to take.

The problem is not that politicians cut taxes to the rich too much. The only problem is that there is not a politician alive who is willing to make big enough tax cuts.

"Wade" wrote:



Yeah baby!!
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
greengold (6h) : My impression is he's a Peruvian soccer fan not a bares fan.
Martha Careful (7h) : Favored Illinois Bishop?
beast (21h) : Technically, the I in FIB stands for Italian now, Si?
dfosterf (23h) : I never thought I'd live long enough to call a pope a FIB, but here we are
Martha Careful (8-May) : Chicago produces a pope before it produces a 4000 yard passing quarterback
wpr (8-May) : HAHAHA Mucky Comment of the day.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : According to reports, Mel Kiper is furious that Sanders wasn't selected as the new Pope
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Time taken to get picked:
Zero2Cool (8-May) : New Pope: 2 days | Shedeur Sanders: 3 days
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Collin Whitchurch @cowhitchurch · 1h Chicago got a pope before it got a QB to throw for 4,000 yards in a season.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : New Pope from Chicago; in other words, the city produced a Pope before a 4000 yard passer
beast (7-May) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
Zero2Cool (7-May) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
Zero2Cool (7-May) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
Zero2Cool (7-May) : You saw me Tweet???
beast (7-May) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
dfosterf (30-Apr) : Luke Elzinga Punter Oklahoma stil unsigned. Green Bay has been mentioned as good fit
beast (30-Apr) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : that contained all prospects info and contact
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

8-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-May / Packers Draft Threads / Martha Careful

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.