Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Thought this might be of interest to some of the "Stats" guys.

http://life.atlantafalcons.com/topic/3908317-ryan-vs-rodgers-game-splits/ 

Just comparing some Splits between the 2 starting QBs this week.

Overall Record:
Ryan = 28-12 (70%)
Rodgers = 24-18 (57.1%)
===================================================
Career 4th Quarter Comebacks to Tie or Win:
Ryan = 9 (Bears, Rams, Giants-lost in OT,Jets, Saints, Bengals,49ers, Ravens, Steelers-lost in OT)
Rodgers = 4 (Bears, Bears, Lions, Dolphins-lost in OT)
====================================================
Away/Home
Ryan = (Home) = 18-1 (94.7%)
Rodgers (Away) = 10-11 (47.6%)
====================================================
November Games
Ryan = 9-4 (69.2%)
Rodgers = 7-8 (46.7%)
====================================================
Against the Division
Ryan vs. NFCN = 5-0 (100%)
Rodgers vs. NFCS = 1-5 (16.7%)
====================================================
Close Games vs. Blow-Outs

Ryan - Margin 0-7 points = 14-4 (77.8%)
Ryan - Margin 8-14 points = 7-4 (63.6%)
Ryan - Margin +15 points = 7-4 (63.6%)

Rodgers - Margin 0-7 points = 7-13 (35%)
Rodgers - Margin 8-14 points = 5-4 (55.5%)
Rodgers - Margin +15 points = 12-1 = (92.3%)
====================================================
Score Going Into the 4th Quarter

Ryan:
Leading going into the 4th quarter = 23-1 (95.8%)
Trailing going into the 4th quarter = 5-10 (33.3%)
Tied going into the 4th quarter = 0-1 (0%)

Rodgers:
Leading going into the 4th quarter = 21-6 (77.8%)
Trailing going into the 4th quarter = 2-11 (15.4%)
Tied going into the 4th quarter = 1-1 (50%)
====================================================

"Tandy" wrote:


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
bozz_2006
14 years ago
What the hell made you think any of us would want to see those stats? :microwave: Couldn't you find any better stats than that to throw out there? lol
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Hey, I liked those stats.
Thanks Pack93z. That's the kind of shit I mentally masturbate to. Damn. Rodgers has some catching up to do. 😞
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

What the hell made you think any of us would want to see those stats? :microwave: Couldn't you find any better stats than that to throw out there? lol

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Fair and impartial.. they are quoting and compiling them.. so post them.

Kind of eye popping if you look at them as just stats and not figure in some of the reasons behind them.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
gbpfan
14 years ago
I don't know how well falcons are just by word of mouth.Based on that sounds like they are good,but I have to say they are underestimating the pack,after all they said vikes d-line the best look at what a-rod and company did to them their o-line they have one of,the best r.bs around we stopped some good teams with their run game,I think even when we played the eagles and Vick was playing all day we would have won that game,this may not be a cake walk just feel this will be a win for the pack.
longtimefan
14 years ago
From a Falcon fan on another forum...

Not saying he is right, not saying anything about it, just posting what I read..

Source Link 
Our O-Line can't be confused with the Hogs of yesteryear, but they work pretty well together. Largely underrated, but the huge weak link is by far Sam Baker. He's the LT and has been highly vilified on our boards for the majority of the season. He nearly got Ryan killed against Tampa a couple of weeks ago. Some members have wanted him to play a RG or RT, but at any rate, we can't wait for Dimitroff to draft a replacement LT for the future.

McClure is undersized, but he is very knowledgeable when it comes to picking up blitzes. We were worried like heck when he was questionable for the Ravens game, but luckily he was able to play. And then there's the right side of the line: Tyson Clabo and Harvey Dahl. These two guys always play through the whistle and finish their blocks. Harvey Dahl was actually nominated as the nastiest O-Lineman in the league. But therein lies the problem. They are extremely aggressive which could lead to costly penalties. So don't be surprised if you see Dahl or Clabo finishing up a block while the play is being whistled dead.

The group is above average run blocking but average on pass blocking. What helps the O-line is Ryan's ability to get rid of the ball quickly. Ryan is able to make quick decisions and rarely holds on to the ball longer than he has to. He would gladly throw the ball out of bounds and live to fight another day. In fact, we're 5th in the league in fewest sacks allowed (15).

On defense, Abraham is a playmaker and can take over a game when he has to. Biermann is undersized but has a relentless motor. On the interior, we rotate our D-lineman in and out on nearly every play. We'll use Chauncey Davis, Jonathan Babineaux (perhaps THE underrated interior D-lineman in all the league), Corey Peters (whom the coaches really love), Vance Walker, Peria Jerry (when he's healthy) and Jamaal Anderson (aka LUDA!). In the run game, Babineaux and Anderson do a great job in gap penetration and stopping the running back in the backfield. They have a horrible job containing mobile QBs, however. In fact, Freeman and Flacco burned us on a couple of scrambles on critical 3rd down situations. If the D-line isn't able to get to Rodgers, then he'll have all day to throw which brings me to the pass defense.

Brian Van Gorder employs a lot of underneath coverage which is designed to prevent deep plays over the top. He does try to blitz, but since we don't play typical bump and run coverages, any slant or in route will beat those blitzes. Mike Williams beat Dunta on a simple slant and ran all the way to the end zone. The TE from Cincy was able to run across the field on an all-out blitz with no one in the middle of the field for the easy touchdown. Same with Lance Moore. It was a blown coverage where we tried to match Weatherspoon on Moore which put DeCoud in a bad situation, and the result was one of the easiest touchdowns anyone could ever make.

Also, Brent Grimes is small, but he always finds a way to almost make a play. We've said it time and time again that if he was a few inches taller, he'd be a top 10 DB. As it stands, Rodgers can play jump ball with his receivers all day on Grimes, and 9 times out of 10 will complete those passes. However, Rodgers can't be lazy with his passes because Grimes has an amazing leaping ability; he also has by far the best hands on the defense.

Mike Mularkey hasn't won many fans this year especially with the debacle in Philly. Since then, we have actually applauded the way he's opened up the playbook and not being so conservative. You could argue though that Ryan has actually called the majority of the game himself. In the past few games, we've started to throw the ball downfield more than usual.

Misc. notes on personnel.

You won't have to worry about Gonzo beating you guys down the seam. He's more of a 5-10 yard receiver on comebacks and out routes. He's also the master at drawing PI calls. Lately, he's been dropping more and more passes each week (including a critical 3rd down drop in the red zone when he was WIDE OPEN). The one thing about Gonzo is that he tends to be Ryan's safety net, and we've labeled that Gonzovision.

Harry Douglas. We don't know what's going on with him. We all envisioned that he would be our Wes Welker and just run all over defenses this year. He's constantly dropping balls left and right, and he just doesn't seem to have the same chemistry with Ryan that other receivers do.

Michael Jenkins. He's not going to burn you down the field. He's more of a possession receiver that will gladly sit in holes in the zone and rarely gets any yac. He really likes the comeback routes and out routes, and he's an excellent blocker in the running game.

Jason Snelling is vastly underrated as a running back and receiver. He'll occasionally will spell Turner in the running game and is capable of going off at any time. He's been used more in the receiving game as of late, and has had key receptions on 3rd down. So, on 3rd downs, your LBs will need to smother him forcing Ryan to hold on to the ball even longer.

Mike Smith will usually go for it on 4th and short 75% of the time. Also, Matt Bryant is pretty much automatic when it comes to field goals. He can pretty much make any kick at any time.

Last but not least, this team plays all 60 minutes. The Falcons of old, would only play the first half and that's it. I'm being honest, but you will have to jump on us like Philly did. There was a stretch of a quarter and a half where we almost got back in it, but Philly shut the door on us. We believe we can come back from any deficit at any time. I am really looking forward to this game Sunday. If you guys have any other questions about our team, don't be afraid to ask.

Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
http://life.atlantafalcons.com/topic/3908297-green-bay-must-win/page__st__60 

Matthews will actually be coming off Tyson Clabo's end. So, good luck there. Matt typically does a good job of feeling the rush, recognizing the blitz and getting the ball out quickly to the hot read, so he doesn't worry me as much.

Mularkey and offensive line coach Paul Boudreau consistently do a great job of neutralizing the opposing defenses pass rush. Between PIT, BAL, CLE and PHI, we have seen it all as far as complex blitzes from 3-4 fronts. So, I'm confident that we'll have be well-prepared for how GB tries to attack us.

STL led the league in sacks entering last Sunday's game, and they barely laid a finger on Matt.

I'm no longer underestimating the coaching and talent on this team. Nor the home-field advantage we have from playing in the Dome.

If 'Spoon is a full-go on Sunday, I really like our chances. The way this team played BAL gave them the confidence that they can play -- and beat -- anyone in the league. It's time we start believing too.

"Ric Roc" wrote:




With 6 more games to play in a very unusual NFL year it is hard to know.

I am not expecting us to finish 14-2 so the question for me is what games could we afford to lose? I don't see GB with their remaining schedule as our chief competition for the number 1 seed. Unfortunately I think Philly seems to be that team, at least for right now, and we have already dropped one to them so they win if it is a tie. In that respect GB is crucial but again that is based on the assumption that PHI won't lose another game. It is a tall order to expect any of the high ranked NFC teams to go 6 more games without any losses and impossible for some since they play each other.

I think the must win game was the Ravens. I am counting on them to knock TB and NO down another notch and if we follow behind with wins of our own we will take the division and probably at least a number 2 seed which may enough.

Getting the number 1 seed is only important if for some reason the NFCCG is between the number 1 and number 2 seeds, otherwise at number 2 we could still be hosting it.

Obviously I want this win and I want it bad but my season won't be over if it doesn't happen.

"Finally" wrote:


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
14 years ago
Heh. Funny, the difference in perspective (at least my own perspective). After the way this season started (both the sloppy play and the injuries) I'm just happy we're winning anything. We win enough to make the playoffs and this whole year will be the weirdest surprise I've seen in a long time.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Packers_Finland
14 years ago
So Pack93z, I bascially said everything of note from those posts in my earlier comment in this thread.

Man, I'm good.
This is a placeholder
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

So Pack93z, I bascially said everything of note from those posts in my earlier comment in this thread.

Man, I'm good.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Yep.. my quest is now complete. ;)

+1 for thinking like a Falcon fan. lol.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
beast (6h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (11h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (12h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (23h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (23h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (23h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Random Babble / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.