bozz_2006
14 years ago
They're a good team and so are we. I don't really have anything against what they said. Number one, they're not as informed about the Packers as we are, just like we're not as informed about the Falcons as they are. And you have to account for a little fan bias. That goes without saying. Still, I think we can and will win this game. I don't think they quite match up with us. Our d-line has gotten pressure and our blitz packages have been effective. Our o-line has been solid for about a month now and I look for that to be a continuing trend. Our running game has improved and Jackson still remains a key pass catcher and pass blocker. Our receivers are dangerous and our secondary is sound. Both our offense and defense have shifted into full attack mode.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Agreed Bozz.. but I always find it interesting to peer through the eyes of another....

What they think of us should not be insulting.. more or less an opportunity to reevaluate our views upon inspection.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
mi_keys
14 years ago

But in the Jets game.. we were given two picks that were questionable at best if we start wanting to get into they won on a pass interference.

Just saying. 😉 {awaits the chorus of repeats or objections to the phrase}

"pack93z" wrote:



Maybe they were questionable, maybe they weren't. I, in my completely and utterly unbiased :onfloor: opinion, feel they never had possession so they can't be down but that debate has already taken its course. The point is you can't put ours down and flaunt theirs. For the record I think their win against Baltimore was very impressive and I'm not trying to take anything from them.

"mi_keys" wrote:



Just getting you back for you correcting me in the Run it Up thread. ;)

"pack93z" wrote:



Lol, you can't let me just once correct you and go unpunished? I'd have done the same.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

But in the Jets game.. we were given two picks that were questionable at best if we start wanting to get into they won on a pass interference.

Just saying. 😉 {awaits the chorus of repeats or objections to the phrase}

"mi_keys" wrote:



Maybe they were questionable, maybe they weren't. I, in my completely and utterly unbiased :onfloor: opinion, feel they never had possession so they can't be down but that debate has already taken its course. The point is you can't put ours down and flaunt theirs. For the record I think their win against Baltimore was very impressive and I'm not trying to take anything from them.

"pack93z" wrote:



Just getting you back for you correcting me in the Run it Up thread. ;)

"mi_keys" wrote:



Lol, you can't let me just once correct you and go unpunished? I'd have done the same.

"pack93z" wrote:



LOL.. nope I had it coming there. Well done. +1..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
nerdmann
14 years ago
Could come down to turnovers. Like one of the fans from the forum was saying. If they do what they've been doing, which is "not turn the ball over." Well, we've been getting alot of turnovers. Our D has alot of ball hawks.
Keep hitting Matt Ryan!
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
mi_keys
14 years ago

But in the Jets game.. we were given two picks that were questionable at best if we start wanting to get into they won on a pass interference.

Just saying. 😉 {awaits the chorus of repeats or objections to the phrase}

"pack93z" wrote:



Maybe they were questionable, maybe they weren't. I, in my completely and utterly unbiased :onfloor: opinion, feel they never had possession so they can't be down but that debate has already taken its course. The point is you can't put ours down and flaunt theirs. For the record I think their win against Baltimore was very impressive and I'm not trying to take anything from them.

"mi_keys" wrote:



Just getting you back for you correcting me in the Run it Up thread. ;)

"pack93z" wrote:



Lol, you can't let me just once correct you and go unpunished? I'd have done the same.

"mi_keys" wrote:



LOL.. nope I had it coming there. Well done. +1..

"pack93z" wrote:



Likewise to you, +1
Born and bred a cheesehead
warhawk
14 years ago
I think the biggest difference in this game will be that Rodgers is now clicking with his receivers and Atlanta has problems with pass defense. This is the one area where there is a little seperation in the two teams.

I also feel like if Atlanta had a hard time getting in the endzone against the Rams it will be even harder against us. We are very good at holding teams to FG's in the redzone.

I think looking for that elusive "complete game" against us is asking alot.

I thought the "homer" award goes to the guy pointing out wins against the 'Boys and Vikes but failing to mention the shutout against the Jets in what has to be the best defensive effort by any team all year.

Overall, they express concern and show respect basically the same we give to them. It should be a heck of a game. If we play the way we have been we will win but that's a hard standard to hold with the level of play recently so high.
"The train is leaving the station."
14 years ago
Thanks for the interesting reading, 93z. +1. :thumbleft:
Since69
14 years ago
Two good, fairly evenly matched teams.

Passing game - Packers
Run game - Falcons

Pass Defense - Packers
Run Defense - Falcons

Special Team - Pick 'Em
Coaching - Packers

It will come down to turnovers and penalties - and I give us the advantage in both categories.

Packers 34, Falcons 27
UserPostedImage
British
14 years ago

Their secondary is solid. Woodson is a stud but, again, outside of him nothing really sticks out. Collins is somewhat of a ballhawk but he's no Ed Reed or Troy P.



I liked this quote. He's damn right Tramon Williams doesn't stand out, that's because no one is throwing at him. Oh yeah, apart from Favre on Sunday.

Tramon will have to bring his A-game as I can see him matched up on Roddy White who is playing at an All Pro level just now.

But with our crunching run D, if we can shut down Turner (not easy) and make them one dimensional we will give ourselves a good shot.

Sounds like it could come down to an aerial shootout.

I just wish we could bring more pressure from the OLB spot opposite CM3.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (59m) : Rude!
beast (1h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (5h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (7h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (9h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.