bozz_2006
14 years ago
They're a good team and so are we. I don't really have anything against what they said. Number one, they're not as informed about the Packers as we are, just like we're not as informed about the Falcons as they are. And you have to account for a little fan bias. That goes without saying. Still, I think we can and will win this game. I don't think they quite match up with us. Our d-line has gotten pressure and our blitz packages have been effective. Our o-line has been solid for about a month now and I look for that to be a continuing trend. Our running game has improved and Jackson still remains a key pass catcher and pass blocker. Our receivers are dangerous and our secondary is sound. Both our offense and defense have shifted into full attack mode.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Agreed Bozz.. but I always find it interesting to peer through the eyes of another....

What they think of us should not be insulting.. more or less an opportunity to reevaluate our views upon inspection.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
mi_keys
14 years ago

But in the Jets game.. we were given two picks that were questionable at best if we start wanting to get into they won on a pass interference.

Just saying. ๐Ÿ˜‰ {awaits the chorus of repeats or objections to the phrase}

"pack93z" wrote:



Maybe they were questionable, maybe they weren't. I, in my completely and utterly unbiased :onfloor: opinion, feel they never had possession so they can't be down but that debate has already taken its course. The point is you can't put ours down and flaunt theirs. For the record I think their win against Baltimore was very impressive and I'm not trying to take anything from them.

"mi_keys" wrote:



Just getting you back for you correcting me in the Run it Up thread. ;)

"pack93z" wrote:



Lol, you can't let me just once correct you and go unpunished? I'd have done the same.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

But in the Jets game.. we were given two picks that were questionable at best if we start wanting to get into they won on a pass interference.

Just saying. ๐Ÿ˜‰ {awaits the chorus of repeats or objections to the phrase}

"mi_keys" wrote:



Maybe they were questionable, maybe they weren't. I, in my completely and utterly unbiased :onfloor: opinion, feel they never had possession so they can't be down but that debate has already taken its course. The point is you can't put ours down and flaunt theirs. For the record I think their win against Baltimore was very impressive and I'm not trying to take anything from them.

"pack93z" wrote:



Just getting you back for you correcting me in the Run it Up thread. ;)

"mi_keys" wrote:



Lol, you can't let me just once correct you and go unpunished? I'd have done the same.

"pack93z" wrote:



LOL.. nope I had it coming there. Well done. +1..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
nerdmann
14 years ago
Could come down to turnovers. Like one of the fans from the forum was saying. If they do what they've been doing, which is "not turn the ball over." Well, we've been getting alot of turnovers. Our D has alot of ball hawks.
Keep hitting Matt Ryan!
โ€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a whileโ€ฆyou do them right all the time.โ€
mi_keys
14 years ago

But in the Jets game.. we were given two picks that were questionable at best if we start wanting to get into they won on a pass interference.

Just saying. ๐Ÿ˜‰ {awaits the chorus of repeats or objections to the phrase}

"pack93z" wrote:



Maybe they were questionable, maybe they weren't. I, in my completely and utterly unbiased :onfloor: opinion, feel they never had possession so they can't be down but that debate has already taken its course. The point is you can't put ours down and flaunt theirs. For the record I think their win against Baltimore was very impressive and I'm not trying to take anything from them.

"mi_keys" wrote:



Just getting you back for you correcting me in the Run it Up thread. ;)

"pack93z" wrote:



Lol, you can't let me just once correct you and go unpunished? I'd have done the same.

"mi_keys" wrote:



LOL.. nope I had it coming there. Well done. +1..

"pack93z" wrote:



Likewise to you, +1
Born and bred a cheesehead
warhawk
14 years ago
I think the biggest difference in this game will be that Rodgers is now clicking with his receivers and Atlanta has problems with pass defense. This is the one area where there is a little seperation in the two teams.

I also feel like if Atlanta had a hard time getting in the endzone against the Rams it will be even harder against us. We are very good at holding teams to FG's in the redzone.

I think looking for that elusive "complete game" against us is asking alot.

I thought the "homer" award goes to the guy pointing out wins against the 'Boys and Vikes but failing to mention the shutout against the Jets in what has to be the best defensive effort by any team all year.

Overall, they express concern and show respect basically the same we give to them. It should be a heck of a game. If we play the way we have been we will win but that's a hard standard to hold with the level of play recently so high.
"The train is leaving the station."
14 years ago
Thanks for the interesting reading, 93z. +1. :thumbleft:
Since69
14 years ago
Two good, fairly evenly matched teams.

Passing game - Packers
Run game - Falcons

Pass Defense - Packers
Run Defense - Falcons

Special Team - Pick 'Em
Coaching - Packers

It will come down to turnovers and penalties - and I give us the advantage in both categories.

Packers 34, Falcons 27
UserPostedImage
British
14 years ago

Their secondary is solid. Woodson is a stud but, again, outside of him nothing really sticks out. Collins is somewhat of a ballhawk but he's no Ed Reed or Troy P.



I liked this quote. He's damn right Tramon Williams doesn't stand out, that's because no one is throwing at him. Oh yeah, apart from Favre on Sunday.

Tramon will have to bring his A-game as I can see him matched up on Roddy White who is playing at an All Pro level just now.

But with our crunching run D, if we can shut down Turner (not easy) and make them one dimensional we will give ourselves a good shot.

Sounds like it could come down to an aerial shootout.

I just wish we could bring more pressure from the OLB spot opposite CM3.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (41m) : Merry Christmas!
beast (9h) : Merry Christmas ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ
beast (17h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (22h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (23h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.