Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I'm not being vague. I'm saying servicemembers aren't special. They're doing a job they voluntarily signed up to do. It's no more honorable or necessary or important than any other job. People will say if it weren't for the military, we wouldn't have the freedoms we enjoy. Now leaving aside how questionable I find that statement (given that with the exception of Great Britain, there's never been a nation that truly represented an imminent threat to the survival of this country, and they lost), I would answer that if it weren't for the average Joe on the street, this country would be intolerable too. If every one of us were servicemembers, there'd be no one left to make the country we know and love. As far as I'm concerned, servicemembers are a group of people performing a highly specific function, one that is relatively minor and insignificant in the grand scheme of things and wouldn't fundamentally alter our lifestyle were it to cease. That's why the Founding Fathers envisioned a system of militias for this country, as opposed to a centralized federally run military.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
14 years ago

I'm not being vague. I'm saying servicemembers aren't special. They're doing a job they voluntarily signed up to do. It's no more honorable or necessary or important than any other job. People will say if it weren't for the military, we wouldn't have the freedoms we enjoy. Now leaving aside how questionable I find that statement (given that with the exception of Great Britain, there's never been a nation that truly represented an imminent threat to the survival of this country, and they lost), I would answer that if it weren't for the average Joe on the street, this country would be intolerable too.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I agree, my main problem was with your statement that seemed to imply that a nurse working in an ER in the US or a teacher is doing something just as commendable as someone actively in a combat zone, willingly becoming a human target. We all serve important functions in society, and I do believe that most people are underrespected in the work that they do, everyone from food service workers to computer programmers to nurses.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
That is exactly what I was implying. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the single most dangerous job in America is meatpacking, where almost 27% of workers sustain an injury on the job every year. The casualty rates for servicemembers are nowhere remotely this high.

But as far as I'm concerned, the element of danger is irrelevant anyway. I am far more grateful to the civilian doctors and nurses who -- admittedly, away from the rigors of combat -- saved the lives of my prematurely born sons than I am to the medics I deployed with, supposedly in the name of defending my freedom, who openly bragged about causing unnecessary pain to their patients because, ya know, they might have been terrorists (and who gives a shit about ragheads and sand niggers anyway?) -- thereby violating the sacred trust to which all medical professionals ascribe: "First, do no harm."

There was a silly girl in my unit who once spoke up while we were in formation: "I want you all to know," she said, "that we're all heroes just for for being here."

I turned to her and said, "Sweetie, the real heroes don't make it home."
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
By the way, I'm going to come out right here and admit I'm a total hypocrite. Every time I see a ROTC cadet wearing the UW-L patch on his right shoulder, I grind my teeth. I always think they don't deserve to wear anything on their right shoulder, since they've never done anything or gone anywhere. It pisses me off.

But that doesn't mean I think it should be illegal to wear it there.
UserPostedImage
flep
14 years ago
Basically


The Village People are fecked aren't they???
Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years
UserPostedImage


I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
so, was I wrong when at 10 (or 12 or whenever it was) I wore my dad's Bronze Star and uniform on Halloween? Was my dad wrong in okaying it? Were we being disrespectful?
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Yes, Wade. Clearly nothing was sacred for your father.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
There have been great points both by Non and Porforis.
There are many "jobs" that deserve our respect.
The first line of protection though, comes from our people in the military. Without them, we probably wouldn't be talking here right now.
Non has the right to his opinion. And that's what it is, his opinion. If he chooses to not put military people on a different level, he has the right to feel that way.
I also have met military people that, after talking with them, lost respect for them. But that was because of the person, not because of the overall military. There are honorable people in all professions.
The doctor that found my blockages, and the surgeon that saved my life, are honerable people.
Of course they didn't have anyone shooting at them while they were doing their jobs.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Neither do the vast majority of military personnel who deploy, though. I doubt ten percent of deployed servicemembers ever hear (much less return) a shot fired in anger. Unless you count mortar fire zinging harmlessly overhead, in which case the number probably climbs.

By your standard, civilian personnel performing convoy or base security; medical missionaries in war-torn countries; and EMS personnel in some of the embattled areas of our own big cities should be worthy of greater honor. For that matter, so should meatpackers, nearly 30% of whom are injured on a yearly basis providing us with the food we eat (compared with the less than 4% of deployed servicemembers who have been killed or received reportable injuries). I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with you, but if that's what you believe, I think it should be stated more explicitly.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Neither do the vast majority of military personnel who deploy, though. I doubt ten percent of deployed servicemembers ever hear (much less return) a shot fired in anger. Unless you count mortar fire zinging harmlessly overhead, in which case the number probably climbs.

By your standard, civilian personnel performing convoy or base security; medical missionaries in war-torn countries; and EMS personnel in some of the embattled areas of our own big cities should be worthy of greater honor. For that matter, so should meatpackers, nearly 30% of whom are injured on a yearly basis providing us with the food we eat (compared with the less than 4% of deployed servicemembers who have been killed or received reportable injuries). I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with you, but if that's what you believe, I think it should be stated more explicitly.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Doesn't the vast majority of military personnel have to go through at least Basic Training? On that information alone, they do more than a civilian does. Thus, they earn it more.

The only reason I'm even 'debating' this is it's obviously an issue with the military brass, otherwise why the rules stating against it? I don't know if it's a sacred thing, or a logistic thing or what.. But it's obviously something they don't like. Sounds to me like the real issue is the lack of stressing those rules.

BTW, the difference between an actor wearing a military uniform and a private in the Army wearing a uniform is pretty simple. The uni that the private is wearing was military issued. The one the actor is wearing is a replica.

I really think it's a principle thing rather than a logistical thing.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (22h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.