BjRaji=DEFMVP
14 years ago
What will are starting Oline look like?
I think there will be competition at LG
But heres my possible Starting lineup

LT:1.Chad Clifton
2.Brain Bulaga
We will be good at LT If clifton goes down we got a solid first round pick.I see Clifton starting Still they resigned him for a reason right?
LG: 1.Daryn Colledge/Marshell Newhouse
I see this as a postion battle because Colledge hasnt been great the past two years and we need to get bigger at guard Newhouse looks good so he might push for the starting job.
C:1.Jason Spitz
2.Scott Wells
Maybe a battle for the start but its unlikely but we still got some good depth here if Spitz is heathy.
RG:1.Josh Sittion
2.Allen Barbre
Barbre was just horrible as a T hes prob most likely better at guard.Josh sittion is becoming a better guard in the league and hes had a good offseason so he"ll be better this season.He was the best olineman out of this group last year in my eyes.

RT:1.Mark Tausher
2.TJ Lang
3.Breno Giacomini
Finally we have some great depth at both T spots Tausher will be fresh at the beginning of the season and if he goes down we got a solid backup in Lang.In my eyes lang was one of are best lineman last year he really helped us out.When he started last year against the browns at LT are team allowed 0 sacks that game so hes pretty good.

Overall I think are oline has improved from last year greatly it obviously wont be elite but it will definitely be improved i give this oline group a B
give me some thoughts on wat u guys think too.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
I don't like seeing Wells not playing. I want him on the field.

Put Colledge backing up Spitz, Spitz at LG, Wells at C and I'll be happy with the rest.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
earthquake
14 years ago

I don't like seeing Wells not playing. I want him on the field.

Put Colledge backing up Spitz, Spitz at LG, Wells at C and I'll be happy with the rest.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Thats pretty much exactly how i feel.
blank
beast
14 years ago
I see the OL line up as


LT: Clifton, Bulaga
LG: Colledge, Spitz, Barbre
C: Wells, Spitz, Dietrich-Smith
RG: Sitton, Lang
RT: Tausher, Lang, Giacomini

I'm not sure I see rookies being able to get in their other than Bulaga...

Also I'm worried about Spitz, back injuries can take a couple of years to come back from... some you can't come back from...

And I know some are hating on College but when he settles in the kid can seriously play like he did in 08 and the second half of last year.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
Clifton....Spitz.....Wells.....Sitton......Tauscher, lock these guys in, they are the starters, let them work together through the pre-season, none of this "let's shuffle some of these guys around and see what happens"

You're starting O-line has to know they are the five guys who are going to be there every week.

Competition is good for a team, but let the young guys battle it out for back-up spots, with Clifton and Tauscher there is a pretty good chance that someone is going to have to fill in at some point.
IMHO The Packers now have a solid 5 man starting group and some pretty good back-ups.

But again, the starting 5 need to know they are the guys from day 1.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
14 years ago

Clifton....Spitz.....Wells.....Sitton......Tauscher, lock these guys in, they are the starters, let them work together through the pre-season, none of this "let's shuffle some of these guys around and see what happens"

You're starting O-line has to know they are the five guys who are going to be there every week.

Competition is good for a team, but let the young guys battle it out for back-up spots, with Clifton and Tauscher there is a pretty good chance that someone is going to have to fill in at some point.
IMHO The Packers now have a solid 5 man starting group and some pretty good back-ups.

But again, the starting 5 need to know they are the guys from day 1.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



If you're looking for stability, I'm not sure I'd include Spitz in the starting lineup. He just had the same back surgery that Justin Harrell had. My thoughts are pretty much in line with Beast's lineup above.
Since69
14 years ago
LT: Clifton, Bulaga
LG: Colledge, Spitz
C: Wells, Spitz
RG: Sitton, Lang
RT: Tauscher, Giacomini
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago
I figured that this would be a thread full of variation of Clifton - Colledge/Spitz - Spitz/Wells - Sitton - Tauscher.

I'll throw a curveball out there. At least for the reserves.

LT - Chad Clifton (Marshall Newhouse)
LG - TJ Lang (Daryn Colledge)
C - Jason Spitz (Scott Wells)
G - Josh Sitton (Evan Dietrich-Smith)
T - Mark Tauscher (Bryan Bulaga)

The odds of this line happening are very slim, but from what I've seen, Bulaga's best position might just be RT, not LT. Newhouse is sickly athletic. If you groom him two years, you might just have yourself a LT.

That frees up TJ to play guard, instead of saving him as Tauscher's replacement.

Giacomini finally gets cut and Evan Dietrich-Smith makes the roster again.

Like I said, it's quite out there.
porky88
14 years ago
It's going to probably be

LT Clifton LG Spitz C Wells RG Sitton RT Tauscher

I want it to look like

LT Clifton LG Lang C Spitz RG Sitton RT Tauscher

I had a brief discussion about this in a different thread with someone. I don't dislike the top line, but I don't want the average to get in the way of the good. Plus, I think Lang has got to get on the field and I think he's a natural left guard.

I think the interior line would see a huge upgrade and definitely be more nasty with a Lang/Spitz/Sitton combo. I want to get bigger. Clifton and Tauscher won't last the season. They'll miss some starts, but that's why you draft Bulaga. You make him your swing backup tackle and work him in the lineup at both left and right tackle.
Greg C.
14 years ago
I like buckeye's lineup best, and I think it is the most likely one as long as Spitz's back holds up through training camp. I think Wells earned the starting center spot last year, and the coaches will not want to mess with success at that position.

Porky's idea of putting Lang at left guard is interesting, but I think he is more valuable at right tackle, especially considering that our only other backups at that position right now are Barbe and Giacomini, who are both horrible.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
30m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

43m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.