Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
TwinkieGorilla
14 years ago
it's called "joking around". try it sometime, chief.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Zero2Cool
14 years ago
No need to be a prick about it.

The joking around isn't the problem, in fact there isn't a problem at all. Congrats, you can say something off topic, big deal? I'm down for the jokes, I just would like to see a comment of yours on the article as well.

I know, I know. I'm such a BAD person because I want the members on this site to contribute their thoughts and opinions on articles. I'm such a bad Chief!! ... spank me? Please? .... pretty please?
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
I wouldn't mind spanking Scarlett Johansen.

NSFW (wish I was that dude in the pic):

UserPostedImage

My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I wouldn't mind spanking Scarlett Johansen.

NSFW (wish I was that dude in the pic):

UserPostedImage

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I really don't like Scarlett Johansson that much. Don't find her particularly good looking or attractive at all.

And it isn't one of Keira Knightley's better pictures, either.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Scarlett Johanssen appeals more to young nerdy guys. She was uber cool in a nerdy way in Ghost World and had a cute relationship with an older guy in Lost in Translation, the two movies I liked her in the most. I found The Man Who Wasn't There to be boring and didn't like The Black Dahlia.

Now when I say young nerdy guys, I don't mean that one bit an insult. Our country has an anti-intellectual current where smart people are not cool. I think nerds are often cool and take pride in being a UNIX Master.

Anyways, back to Scarlett. Her appeal is more than just looks. She has an aura to her that the majority of young women don't have. If you look at my favorite actresses (looks, not talent), they're often 35+. Like off the top of my head, Salma Hayek and Monica Bellucci are both 40+. Yes, Scarlett's aura doesn't appeal to everyone. But it appeals to me and obviously Twinkie.

I do agree that that's not one of Keira's better pictures. Considering they probably shot 500 pics for that shoot (no exaggeration), surely they could have picked a better shot.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
14 years ago
Scarlett is bomb. And hot.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
wtf lol
UserPostedImage
TwinkieGorilla
14 years ago

No need to be a prick about it.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



prove it.

I really don't like Scarlett Johansson that much. Don't find her particularly good looking or attractive at all.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



this is what separates the wheat from the gay.

Scarlett Johanssen appeals more to young nerdy guys.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



interesting. i'm neither young nor nerdy (at least until you really get to know me...and know that i've been obsessed with Fallout since 1998 and i'm a huge horror film buff and an English major and...fuck. i'm nerdy. anyway...) yet i'd still most likely fuck ScarJo at least once, given the chance.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Rockmolder
14 years ago

I really don't like Scarlett Johansson that much. Don't find her particularly good looking or attractive at all.

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



this is what separates the wheat from the gay.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Lol.

Her face is just so... Meh. It's really nothing special. I'd rather have something with just about 50% of the women who work at the supermarket I work at than with Scarlett Johansson.
Formo
14 years ago
That's the thing Rock.. Scarlett has got the 'girl next door' look. And her body doesn't look like she hasn't had a meal in 2 months.

The difference between Scarlett and 50% of the girls at your supermarket? Scarlett has more money. Therefore, Scarlett = untouchable. And us guys want what us guys can't have.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (35m) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
Zero2Cool (1h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (1h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (5h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (5h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (5h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (5h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (5h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (5h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (5h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (6h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (7h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (7h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (9h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (17h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.