TwinkieGorilla
14 years ago
it's called "joking around". try it sometime, chief.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Zero2Cool
14 years ago
No need to be a prick about it.

The joking around isn't the problem, in fact there isn't a problem at all. Congrats, you can say something off topic, big deal? I'm down for the jokes, I just would like to see a comment of yours on the article as well.

I know, I know. I'm such a BAD person because I want the members on this site to contribute their thoughts and opinions on articles. I'm such a bad Chief!! ... spank me? Please? .... pretty please?
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
I wouldn't mind spanking Scarlett Johansen.

NSFW (wish I was that dude in the pic):

UserPostedImage

My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rockmolder
14 years ago

I wouldn't mind spanking Scarlett Johansen.

NSFW (wish I was that dude in the pic):

UserPostedImage

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I really don't like Scarlett Johansson that much. Don't find her particularly good looking or attractive at all.

And it isn't one of Keira Knightley's better pictures, either.
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Scarlett Johanssen appeals more to young nerdy guys. She was uber cool in a nerdy way in Ghost World and had a cute relationship with an older guy in Lost in Translation, the two movies I liked her in the most. I found The Man Who Wasn't There to be boring and didn't like The Black Dahlia.

Now when I say young nerdy guys, I don't mean that one bit an insult. Our country has an anti-intellectual current where smart people are not cool. I think nerds are often cool and take pride in being a UNIX Master.

Anyways, back to Scarlett. Her appeal is more than just looks. She has an aura to her that the majority of young women don't have. If you look at my favorite actresses (looks, not talent), they're often 35+. Like off the top of my head, Salma Hayek and Monica Bellucci are both 40+. Yes, Scarlett's aura doesn't appeal to everyone. But it appeals to me and obviously Twinkie.

I do agree that that's not one of Keira's better pictures. Considering they probably shot 500 pics for that shoot (no exaggeration), surely they could have picked a better shot.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
14 years ago
Scarlett is bomb. And hot.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
wtf lol
UserPostedImage
TwinkieGorilla
14 years ago

No need to be a prick about it.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



prove it.

I really don't like Scarlett Johansson that much. Don't find her particularly good looking or attractive at all.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



this is what separates the wheat from the gay.

Scarlett Johanssen appeals more to young nerdy guys.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



interesting. i'm neither young nor nerdy (at least until you really get to know me...and know that i've been obsessed with Fallout since 1998 and i'm a huge horror film buff and an English major and...fuck. i'm nerdy. anyway...) yet i'd still most likely fuck ScarJo at least once, given the chance.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Rockmolder
14 years ago

I really don't like Scarlett Johansson that much. Don't find her particularly good looking or attractive at all.

"TwinkieGorilla" wrote:



this is what separates the wheat from the gay.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Lol.

Her face is just so... Meh. It's really nothing special. I'd rather have something with just about 50% of the women who work at the supermarket I work at than with Scarlett Johansson.
Formo
14 years ago
That's the thing Rock.. Scarlett has got the 'girl next door' look. And her body doesn't look like she hasn't had a meal in 2 months.

The difference between Scarlett and 50% of the girls at your supermarket? Scarlett has more money. Therefore, Scarlett = untouchable. And us guys want what us guys can't have.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
wpr (2h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (2h) : Only 4
wpr (2h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (4h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (5h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.