RaiderPride
14 years ago
It is really more than a First, Second, and Third. I was talking about THIS YEAR. The First overall pick, the 33rd, basically a first, and the first pick in the THIRD round.

This is a very deep draft. Draft Bradford... and go from there..

Well, I guess I did not make the trade sweet enough, but I like the feed back.

Personally I would not trade him for four first rounders.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
14 years ago
I would trade Aaron Rodgers for 5 first rounders. :cyclopsani:
DakotaT
14 years ago
I wouldn't even trade Rodgers for Manning or Brady. There are no amount of draft picks I would take. We are set at QB for another decade. If Uncle Ted did trade him, I would join Dhazer, DHPackr, and DD80 on the Uncle Ted negativity train.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago
Where's Dhazer, anyway? He should be here, telling us that Rodgers is just a two year starter and that he isn't worth more than a 2nd. We should take off the green glasses.

I can't think of a single player that I'd rather have on the roster than Rodgers right now. His combination of age, potential and how good he is already makes him, in my eyes, the nr. 1 pick overall if you'd redistribute all players.

Now if Flynn was as good as some scouts believed he would be with a year or two of grooming, he'd be near Rodgers' level or even over that. I find that hard to believe, but if that was the case, I'd trade Rodgers right now, netting a first round pick or 3 (Both 49ers picks this year and maybe one next year, for instance) and we'd be the SB favorites, after adding 3 instant impact guys in the 1st.

I know, wishfull thinking, but that'd be great.
nerdmann
14 years ago
Just not available, plain and simple. Even for the John Hadl trade.
The dude is EXTRA motivated to win at least TWO superbowls. Not only does he have the skill and aptitude. But he's got that extra motivation, you know?
Even if we drafted a guy and developed him through MM's QB school, the new guy wouldn't have that extra little burning desire. That's the ultimate intangible.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
British
14 years ago
Good question to start a thread.

I think in this draft alone it would have to take a team's entire draft to get me interested and I probably wouldn't take it, although it would make for a fun draft weekend :-)

If we had the #1 pick we would be able to draft Bradford who may one day be good enough to be a franchise QB. But the contract would be brutal.

I'd be happy for us to get maximum value and trade Rodgers in his 30s, after a couple of SB wins as long as we have a guy waiting in the wings (like Rodgers was).

Amazing to think we drafted a guy 24th overall who many of us wouldn't trade for 3 first round picks.

Just shows how important it is to grab the talent that falls to you on draft day.
UserPostedImage
earthquake
14 years ago
3 firsts + a proven starting level QB(someone like Jason Campbell or better) to even start the conversation.
blank
nerdmann
14 years ago
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/13/already-the-big-ben-trade-rumors-start/ 

Already, the Big Ben trade rumors start

Per John Fedko of WPXI-TV, the local NBC affiliate, one of the rumors features the Rams trading the No. 1 overall pick and next year's first-rounder to the Steelers for Roethlisberger.


NOTE: I'd have to think he'd be worth more than Roethlisberger. Big Ben's won the big game, but he's older and uh, has some problems right now.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
GermanGilbert
14 years ago

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/13/already-the-big-ben-trade-rumors-start/

Already, the Big Ben trade rumors start

Per John Fedko of WPXI-TV, the local NBC affiliate, one of the rumors features the Rams trading the No. 1 overall pick and next year's first-rounder to the Steelers for Roethlisberger.

"nerdmann" wrote:



the 1st ovr and a future 1st for roethlisberger??? :onfloor: :onfloor:

you have to be kidding me. yeah, this guy won 2 super bowl, but he did it because of a formerly good ground attack and a heck of a defense. trent dilfer won one, too.

don't get me wrong, roethlisberger is a good qb, but he's not more than at the end of top 10 in the nfl. this guy just does not lose games, but he can not win it either for the most part. if a first overall and a future first is the price for big ben, i would not trade aaron for 10 firsts.
blank
dhazer
14 years ago
LoL Rock :P


To answer your question Yes I would trade Rodgers, You maybe giving up a very good qb but then again if you don't think the trade would be worth it you need to take off the homer glasses.

Think about it your giving up a very good qb but he can be replaced and majorly improve your team. Think of it we would have what 4 picks in the first 46? Also you package the 3rd and our 4th and get back into the 2nd round. You basically could get 5 starters for one player. Now anyone that wouldn't be willing to do that I think would be foolish.


Trade the #1 overall to someone that wants Bradford and collect maybe a 1st and 2nd and then you get even more value.


But thats just me remember one guy don't make a team and if I could get 4 or 5 young starters I would do it.


I'm not knocking Rodgers because yes I think he is a very good qb but hell If I had to make that call I would accept it faster than a girl losing her prom dress on prom night and before they could change their minds.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (40m) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (19h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.