RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

wow. directly from my vikings fan husband...they need to bench him. on almost every throw he makes, the WR's have to come back to the ball. i don't know what the hell's going on but that team is a hot mess.

my personal opinion, i'm thinkin t-jack can hand off the ball as well as favre & for a whole lot less $$!!

"4PackGirl" wrote:



I'm sorry but can your Vikings fan husband sign up on the forum.

Which game was he watching? What do you want him to do, Harvin was even injured for part of the game and his #2 receiver was Greg Lewis. I get it people hate Favre but he wants to bench him for T-Jack?!
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

the 1st int? he threw BEHIND the wr at the goal line was tipped and kicked and picked off.

"longtimefan" wrote:



I'm sorry but the first INT was entirely Harvin's fault. It hit him RIGHT in the hands, directly in the hands. You can watch it here:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010091902/2010/REG2/dolphins@vikings/analyze/box-score#tab:watch 

I agree Favre sucked and was a HUGE reason for the loss but you cannot pin the first INT on Favre (I'm not saying you are doing that). If a ball hits you directly in the hands, you catch it.
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

Nope the Favre fans are saying it was Peterson being stopped on 4th down

and the Wr not coming back for the balls

"longtimefan" wrote:



I hope for their sake that is tongue in check.

"mi_keys" wrote:




Right from Bretts board

BB doesn't adjust to the ball. brett threw him the ball and let him make a play.

3 picks none hurt too much though

I don't feel like Favre cost them the game given how his two bad turnovers didn't hurt them

"longtimefan" wrote:



one int was a TD and it didnt hurt?



I watched the game in fast forward for a lot of it but which INT was a TD?

And I don't get why you always take the views of a few people and say "Favre fans say this or that". Every group of fans, whether it be baseball, basketball, football or whatever has irrational fans, you can't take their views at face value. For example, some people on here wanted Favre to get injured last year by the Packers, I don't think its fair if people go around and say "Packers fans want FAvre injured and hurt" because most of us didn't say that, it was only a few that felt that way.
blank
4PackGirl
14 years ago
so redsox, you think favre is playing well? he's at the top of his game? it's the wr's fault? injuries are causing his throws to go behind the wr's? the coaches aren't calling the right plays? he's not in sync with the wr's cause he hasn't had enuf playing time with them? i'm just wondering if you feel he's culpable in any of these scenarios or is it everyone else making the mistakes? and believe it or not, i'm actually not being a smart ass here - just trying to figure out what you think is the problem.
longtimefan
14 years ago

the 1st int? he threw BEHIND the wr at the goal line was tipped and kicked and picked off.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



I'm sorry but the first INT was entirely Harvin's fault. It hit him RIGHT in the hands, directly in the hands. You can watch it here:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010091902/2010/REG2/dolphins@vikings/analyze/box-score#tab:watch 

I agree Favre sucked and was a HUGE reason for the loss but you cannot pin the first INT on Favre (I'm not saying you are doing that). If a ball hits you directly in the hands, you catch it.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Your correct I thought he threw it behind...I then saw the reply saw him slip..couldnt find my post to edit it

thanks!
longtimefan
14 years ago

Nope the Favre fans are saying it was Peterson being stopped on 4th down

and the Wr not coming back for the balls

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



I hope for their sake that is tongue in check.

"longtimefan" wrote:




Right from Bretts board

BB doesn't adjust to the ball. brett threw him the ball and let him make a play.

3 picks none hurt too much though

I don't feel like Favre cost them the game given how his two bad turnovers didn't hurt them

"mi_keys" wrote:



one int was a TD and it didnt hurt?

"longtimefan" wrote:



I watched the game in fast forward for a lot of it but which INT was a TD?

And I don't get why you always take the views of a few people and say "Favre fans say this or that". Every group of fans, whether it be baseball, basketball, football or whatever has irrational fans, you can't take their views at face value. For example, some people on here wanted Favre to get injured last year by the Packers, I don't think its fair if people go around and say "Packers fans want FAvre injured and hurt" because most of us didn't say that, it was only a few that felt that way.



Fine it was a fumble for a TD...Point remained he fumbled and it was 6 points....And that poster said his turnovers didnt hurt

Are they Favre fans or Packer fans over on OBF?

I say they are Favre fans

Wow never seen anyone get so defensive over Brett that wasnt on OBF
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago
I'm not saying them are Packers fans on OBF - which I've never even visited. I don't know who's on there all I'm saying is that there are a few crazies in every fan group.
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

so redsox, you think favre is playing well? he's at the top of his game? it's the wr's fault? injuries are causing his throws to go behind the wr's? the coaches aren't calling the right plays? he's not in sync with the wr's cause he hasn't had enuf playing time with them? i'm just wondering if you feel he's culpable in any of these scenarios or is it everyone else making the mistakes? and believe it or not, i'm actually not being a smart ass here - just trying to figure out what you think is the problem.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



No, I don't think that at all, I don't think he's at the top of his game or playing well. I think its a combination of things, he's make some really bad decisions and the WRs do suck. I don't think the throws are that bad to be honest, for a 40 year old guy, he's got zip and distance. I think its bad decisions that have hurt him. Either way, I also think the WR's cannot get open or the play designs are really bad.

You can't tell me that having an injured Harvin and no Rice has some impact on the Vikings pass game. I think Favre sucked against the Dolphins but I dont' think the failure in the pass game is all on him (although a lot of it is on two bad decisions). It takes two to tango and IMO Berrian sucks and Harvin is playing hurt. The only legit passing threat he has is Shanicoe which he has used again and again with success. The Shanico thing shows me that Favre still has "it".

This whole "in sync with receivers" thing is an excuse IMO. Even if Favre was in training camp, Harvin and Rice were injured and Camirillo didn't come in until after Favre came.

Right now I just think the WRs stink and Favre is trying to do too much, he think he's throwing to Rice. That pass with the deep INT was a play last year that probably works (or at worst is incomplete) because Rice is tall. That's on Favre, he needs to realize that Berrian can only do one thing, which is catch the ball when he's wide open.

I just think the reaction to bench Favre based on throwing to a WR corp that had Greg Lewis as the #2 for a while is a bit of an over reaction. They played two good teams, on thats a SB champion on the road. To call for benching and T-Jack at this point is premature IMO. Favre started out slow last year but they played the Browns, I think he had 100 yards passing.

Also I just came across this:

"Were running basically the same plays, Harvin said. Its just sometimes when you have a 6-5 receiver you can just throw it up to him whether hes covered or not, and he can make a play. From that standpoint, we wont be able to fix that or find another receiver to replace him. We just have to come up with different schemes to try and get people open.

If the Vikes are running the same plays as last year and they don't have their 6-5 receiver, they're stupid and they have a lot bigger problems than QB at this point.
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago
Also on the Fumble, I just want to point out that Clay Matthews is going to destroy Favre. That play the Vikings double teamed the Dolphins player. He went right through Shanicoe and Loadholt to get to Favre. They have more issues than just QB and WR on offense.
blank
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Also on the Fumble, I just want to point out that Clay Matthews is going to destroy Favre. That play the Vikings double teamed the Dolphins player. He went right through Shanicoe and Loadholt to get to Favre. They have more issues than just QB and WR on offense.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



You're right. Favre hasn't been very sharp, but Sullivan, Herrera and Loadholt haven't been doing a good job on that right side, at all. Next to that, McKinnie has always been more of a run blocker than a modern blindside protector.

Matthews should be able to get past Loadholt. They can't possibly double Clay, as Pickett should be gapping between Herrera and Sullivan, maybe even between Herrera and Loadholt. Our D-line and OLBs should have the advantage over their O-line.

That said, that O-line still has the same players as last year. If we play more aggressive and don't play to stop Peterson, we should get to Favre.

Oh, as for Favre, there's more than just his late arrival in this. Underthrowing balls they way he did yesterday can't be pinned on being out of sync.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (23h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
20h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.