RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

wow. directly from my vikings fan husband...they need to bench him. on almost every throw he makes, the WR's have to come back to the ball. i don't know what the hell's going on but that team is a hot mess.

my personal opinion, i'm thinkin t-jack can hand off the ball as well as favre & for a whole lot less $$!!

"4PackGirl" wrote:



I'm sorry but can your Vikings fan husband sign up on the forum.

Which game was he watching? What do you want him to do, Harvin was even injured for part of the game and his #2 receiver was Greg Lewis. I get it people hate Favre but he wants to bench him for T-Jack?!
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

the 1st int? he threw BEHIND the wr at the goal line was tipped and kicked and picked off.

"longtimefan" wrote:



I'm sorry but the first INT was entirely Harvin's fault. It hit him RIGHT in the hands, directly in the hands. You can watch it here:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010091902/2010/REG2/dolphins@vikings/analyze/box-score#tab:watch 

I agree Favre sucked and was a HUGE reason for the loss but you cannot pin the first INT on Favre (I'm not saying you are doing that). If a ball hits you directly in the hands, you catch it.
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

Nope the Favre fans are saying it was Peterson being stopped on 4th down

and the Wr not coming back for the balls

"longtimefan" wrote:



I hope for their sake that is tongue in check.

"mi_keys" wrote:




Right from Bretts board

BB doesn't adjust to the ball. brett threw him the ball and let him make a play.

3 picks none hurt too much though

I don't feel like Favre cost them the game given how his two bad turnovers didn't hurt them

"longtimefan" wrote:



one int was a TD and it didnt hurt?



I watched the game in fast forward for a lot of it but which INT was a TD?

And I don't get why you always take the views of a few people and say "Favre fans say this or that". Every group of fans, whether it be baseball, basketball, football or whatever has irrational fans, you can't take their views at face value. For example, some people on here wanted Favre to get injured last year by the Packers, I don't think its fair if people go around and say "Packers fans want FAvre injured and hurt" because most of us didn't say that, it was only a few that felt that way.
blank
4PackGirl
14 years ago
so redsox, you think favre is playing well? he's at the top of his game? it's the wr's fault? injuries are causing his throws to go behind the wr's? the coaches aren't calling the right plays? he's not in sync with the wr's cause he hasn't had enuf playing time with them? i'm just wondering if you feel he's culpable in any of these scenarios or is it everyone else making the mistakes? and believe it or not, i'm actually not being a smart ass here - just trying to figure out what you think is the problem.
longtimefan
14 years ago

the 1st int? he threw BEHIND the wr at the goal line was tipped and kicked and picked off.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



I'm sorry but the first INT was entirely Harvin's fault. It hit him RIGHT in the hands, directly in the hands. You can watch it here:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010091902/2010/REG2/dolphins@vikings/analyze/box-score#tab:watch 

I agree Favre sucked and was a HUGE reason for the loss but you cannot pin the first INT on Favre (I'm not saying you are doing that). If a ball hits you directly in the hands, you catch it.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Your correct I thought he threw it behind...I then saw the reply saw him slip..couldnt find my post to edit it

thanks!
longtimefan
14 years ago

Nope the Favre fans are saying it was Peterson being stopped on 4th down

and the Wr not coming back for the balls

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



I hope for their sake that is tongue in check.

"longtimefan" wrote:




Right from Bretts board

BB doesn't adjust to the ball. brett threw him the ball and let him make a play.

3 picks none hurt too much though

I don't feel like Favre cost them the game given how his two bad turnovers didn't hurt them

"mi_keys" wrote:



one int was a TD and it didnt hurt?

"longtimefan" wrote:



I watched the game in fast forward for a lot of it but which INT was a TD?

And I don't get why you always take the views of a few people and say "Favre fans say this or that". Every group of fans, whether it be baseball, basketball, football or whatever has irrational fans, you can't take their views at face value. For example, some people on here wanted Favre to get injured last year by the Packers, I don't think its fair if people go around and say "Packers fans want FAvre injured and hurt" because most of us didn't say that, it was only a few that felt that way.



Fine it was a fumble for a TD...Point remained he fumbled and it was 6 points....And that poster said his turnovers didnt hurt

Are they Favre fans or Packer fans over on OBF?

I say they are Favre fans

Wow never seen anyone get so defensive over Brett that wasnt on OBF
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago
I'm not saying them are Packers fans on OBF - which I've never even visited. I don't know who's on there all I'm saying is that there are a few crazies in every fan group.
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

so redsox, you think favre is playing well? he's at the top of his game? it's the wr's fault? injuries are causing his throws to go behind the wr's? the coaches aren't calling the right plays? he's not in sync with the wr's cause he hasn't had enuf playing time with them? i'm just wondering if you feel he's culpable in any of these scenarios or is it everyone else making the mistakes? and believe it or not, i'm actually not being a smart ass here - just trying to figure out what you think is the problem.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



No, I don't think that at all, I don't think he's at the top of his game or playing well. I think its a combination of things, he's make some really bad decisions and the WRs do suck. I don't think the throws are that bad to be honest, for a 40 year old guy, he's got zip and distance. I think its bad decisions that have hurt him. Either way, I also think the WR's cannot get open or the play designs are really bad.

You can't tell me that having an injured Harvin and no Rice has some impact on the Vikings pass game. I think Favre sucked against the Dolphins but I dont' think the failure in the pass game is all on him (although a lot of it is on two bad decisions). It takes two to tango and IMO Berrian sucks and Harvin is playing hurt. The only legit passing threat he has is Shanicoe which he has used again and again with success. The Shanico thing shows me that Favre still has "it".

This whole "in sync with receivers" thing is an excuse IMO. Even if Favre was in training camp, Harvin and Rice were injured and Camirillo didn't come in until after Favre came.

Right now I just think the WRs stink and Favre is trying to do too much, he think he's throwing to Rice. That pass with the deep INT was a play last year that probably works (or at worst is incomplete) because Rice is tall. That's on Favre, he needs to realize that Berrian can only do one thing, which is catch the ball when he's wide open.

I just think the reaction to bench Favre based on throwing to a WR corp that had Greg Lewis as the #2 for a while is a bit of an over reaction. They played two good teams, on thats a SB champion on the road. To call for benching and T-Jack at this point is premature IMO. Favre started out slow last year but they played the Browns, I think he had 100 yards passing.

Also I just came across this:

"Were running basically the same plays, Harvin said. Its just sometimes when you have a 6-5 receiver you can just throw it up to him whether hes covered or not, and he can make a play. From that standpoint, we wont be able to fix that or find another receiver to replace him. We just have to come up with different schemes to try and get people open.

If the Vikes are running the same plays as last year and they don't have their 6-5 receiver, they're stupid and they have a lot bigger problems than QB at this point.
blank
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago
Also on the Fumble, I just want to point out that Clay Matthews is going to destroy Favre. That play the Vikings double teamed the Dolphins player. He went right through Shanicoe and Loadholt to get to Favre. They have more issues than just QB and WR on offense.
blank
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Also on the Fumble, I just want to point out that Clay Matthews is going to destroy Favre. That play the Vikings double teamed the Dolphins player. He went right through Shanicoe and Loadholt to get to Favre. They have more issues than just QB and WR on offense.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



You're right. Favre hasn't been very sharp, but Sullivan, Herrera and Loadholt haven't been doing a good job on that right side, at all. Next to that, McKinnie has always been more of a run blocker than a modern blindside protector.

Matthews should be able to get past Loadholt. They can't possibly double Clay, as Pickett should be gapping between Herrera and Sullivan, maybe even between Herrera and Loadholt. Our D-line and OLBs should have the advantage over their O-line.

That said, that O-line still has the same players as last year. If we play more aggressive and don't play to stop Peterson, we should get to Favre.

Oh, as for Favre, there's more than just his late arrival in this. Underthrowing balls they way he did yesterday can't be pinned on being out of sync.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (7h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (7h) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (8h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (8h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (8h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (8h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (8h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (8h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (8h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (8h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (8h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (8h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (10h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (10h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (10h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.