Why do you like him better than Grant? Grant is a top 10 RB (7th in rushing yards, 7th in TDs, 8th in total fantasy points) and he doesn't fumble. One fumble in all of 2009. He also had a 4.4 average behind a mediocre OL.

---

I doubt it will happen, but I would not be surprised to see Matt Flynn get traded. Not because we don't want him, but because someone else wants him enough to make it worth our while.

---

Because he's faster, cuts much better, has much better vision and can catch the ball. Wouldn't be surprised to see them deal Flynn either.

---

Aaron Rodgers.

I had him mocked to us in the 2nd round before the 2009 draft. He has great athleticism and should fit quite well as a 3-4 OLB.

He has all the tools to rush the passer, while still being able to drop back in a zone and play the run, as well. I thought he was horribly misscast when the Giants selected him to play SAM in their scheme. I still think he is.

Like a lot of young guys, he doens't have a big pass rushing repetoire, but you can mold this guy into one heck of a player.

Do you think Graham Harrell is ready to be the #2 QB? I sure don't. So unless a capable backup QB is part of the deal, I don't think it would be wise to trade Flynn. And of course there would have to be another player traded to the Packers to make such a deal worthwhile--otherwise they would just be swapping one capable backup QB for another. Is Flynn worth so much that he could be traded for a capable backup QB AND a good player at some other position? I think that would be a tough sell and also pretty disruptive to the team with the regular season just about to start.

When the Packers have traded away QB's (Brunell, Detmer, Brooks, Hasselbeck--man, there were a lot of them) in the past, they have usually felt pretty good about their #3 guy.

---

I wouldn't like it, but Ted kicked Craig Nall to the curb and replaced him with two rookies behind Rodgers.

Like you said, I don't see it happening. I don't think we'll get enough in return at this point and going with Harrell would be way too risky.

I think the Flynn trade is a year away, he still has 2 years on his contract.

---

A little off topic, but everyone knows I can't stand TT. I am starting to like him and it's not by choice but seeing moves other teams are making got me thinking I am actually glad we have a stingy bastard as our gm.

Things could be worse and have a gm like the Vikes.

WTF are they thinking

Giants | Sage Rosenfels acquired
Comment (0) Tweet! Share on Facebook

Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:30:55 -0400

The New York Giants have acquired QB Sage Rosenfels from the Minnesota Vikings, reports ESPNews. It is not known what the Giants gave up to acquire him.


Updating a previous report, the Minnesota Vikings traded RB Darius Reynaud along with QB Sage Rosenfels to the New York Giants in exchange for an undisclosed 2011 NFL Draft pick and a conditional draft choice in the 2012 NFL Draft Friday, Sept. 3, reports the Minneapolis Star Tribune's Judd Zulgad. The deal is contingent on both Rosenfels and Reynaud passing their physicals.

---

No chance we trade Flynn away at this point. The guys been studying our scheme for the last couple years and really wouldn't bring a ton of value in a trade. He's worth alot more to us then he would starting from scratch on a different team.
Lee is the one I would like to see shopped. I know there's next to no experience behind Finley after Havner. But Lee should bring good value, and is over paid for a situational backup TE. Make Havner the 2nd TE and save a roster spot for Quarless or Crabtree, preferably Quarless becuase I think we could hide Crabtree on the PS for a year.

---