Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Just read a story about Roger Clemens getting indicted for lying to and "obstruction" of Congress.

I'm not a fan of Clemens. And I'm sure there's a law on the books to the effect that one can't obstruct Congress.

But my question is a bit different: should it be against the law to lie to a Congressional committee.

Or, if you want to get even more radical, why should a Congressional committee have the power to issue subpoenas?

Discuss.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Presidents do it all the time.

Let me add, so do heads of major corporations. I'd love to see the people who did scare tactics to get Congress to vote for the bailouts get indicted for lying.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
Porforis
14 years ago

Presidents do it all the time.

Let me add, so do heads of major corporations. I'd love to see the people who did scare tactics to get Congress to vote for the bailouts get indicted for lying.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Lying to congress is one thing, lying while under oath before a congressional committee is another thing.
4PackGirl
14 years ago
i find it rather ironic that they don't enjoy being lied to. politicians=liars. nuff said.
IronMan
14 years ago

Presidents do it all the time.

Let me add, so do heads of major corporations. I'd love to see the people who did scare tactics to get Congress to vote for the bailouts get indicted for lying.

"Porforis" wrote:



Lying to congress is one thing, lying while under oath before a congressional committee is another thing.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

This.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Should lying under oath generally be a crime, then?

Or is there something special about doing so when Congress administers the oath. Should Congress be able to have oath-breaking enforced more than the rest of us?

Perjury is essentially lying under oath. But there is a difference between lying under oath to a court of law (to which under our constitution gives the judicial power) and lying under oath to you or me (to whom it doesn't). I can sue you for breach of your promise if we have a contractual relationship, but that's a civil matter not a criminal one the way perjury is.

Why is lying under oath to Congress more like lying to the court under oath than it is like lying to me under oath? And should it be?

I don't think the answer is at all obvious here. And I personally would argue that criminalizing lying to congress, under oath or otherwise, is the wrong side of the fence. For two reasons.

First, Congress, unlike me, has an intimate relationship with the executive "enforcement" wing of the state -- they make the laws that enable enforcement of their legislative will. In short, they can by the nature of what they do put the threat of force behind their will -- they don't need yet another threat-making ability of "obstruction".

Think of what would happen if someone refuses to testify to Congress under oath. Can you say "no, thanks, sorry, not today" without being thought of having something evil to hide? I don't think so. The only people who do that are criminals and unpatriotic slugs. And Congresscritters, like the bullies they are, like all bullies, are going to encourage with their control over the big elevated chairs and the ears of every network microphone for us to think just that.

When an essential part of political participation should be the ability to say "none of your fucking business." If I'm a criminal, it's not the legislature's job to bring me to justice and make me talk. It's the judicial system.

Second, Congressional committees aren't "fact finders" the way the courts are. They aren't bound by rules of civil and criminal procedure, or by the Federal Rules of Evidence. They are politicians with agendas. They are not disinterested appliers of the law. Their interest is not with applying the law to the facts, their interest is making the laws. Usually in lines with their particular biases and ideologies and interests.

Judges are not unbiased or free of these problems of course. But unlike congresscritters, they don't decide civil cases, much less criminal ones, as advocates. Congressmen and Congresswomen do.

Morally, should I be expected to tell the truth. Sure. To everyone.

Legally, should I be subject to jail if I lie under oath. No.

Not unless the person I'm lying to is "someone special". Like a court.

IMO, Congressional committees fail to meet the basic "someone special" requirement.

Not unless your definition of someone special is "fertilizer producer."
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
So in a nutshell, Wade, you would argue that Congress should not be able to hand out subpoenas because it is not, in fact, a judicial body? I can buy that argument. When were the first congressional subpoenas handed out, and has this practice ever been challenged (and defended) in court?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

So in a nutshell, Wade, you would argue that Congress should not be able to hand out subpoenas because it is not, in fact, a judicial body? I can buy that argument. When were the first congressional subpoenas handed out, and has this practice ever been challenged (and defended) in court?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



On the historical question, I do not know. Though "lying to the king" has long been considered a crime. And I don't think it has been limited to lying to the king when he acts in his judicial capacity. :)

As for your first question. I'm about 96 percent there. I am open to people explaining why "not just" judicial bodies should have subpoena power (which is part of the reason I started the thread). But I don't know what the other grounds would be.

Because it seems to me they would have to get past one of the big reasons we have separation of powers and of functions in the American system: namely, that those who make rules like to set up rules so that they get their own way.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5h) : Seems some are flocking to BlueSky and leaving Tweeter. I wonder if BlueSky allows embeded lists
beast (12-Nov) : He's a review guy
Zero2Cool (12-Nov) : Jordy Nelson is still in the NFL.
Zero2Cool (11-Nov) : Ok, will do.
wpr (11-Nov) : Kevin, donate it to a local food pantry or whatever she wants to do with it. Thanks
wpr (11-Nov) : Kevin,
Zero2Cool (11-Nov) : Wayne, got your girl scout order.
dfosterf (11-Nov) : I believe Zero was being sarcastic
dfosterf (11-Nov) : Due to that rookie kicker Jake Bates that Zero said "he didn't want anyway". 58 yarder to tie the game, 52 yarder to win it. In fairness,
Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Lions escape with a win
Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : and now Goff looking better
Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Goff with ANOTHER INT
Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : and now Stroud throwing INTs
Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Goff having an ATROCIOUS game
wpr (11-Nov) : Happy birthday Corps. Ever faithful. Thanks dfosterf.
Mucky Tundra (10-Nov) : stiff armed by Baker Mayfield for about 5-7 yards and still managed to get a pass off
Mucky Tundra (10-Nov) : Nick Bosa
wpr (8-Nov) : Jets are Packers (L)East
Zero2Cool (8-Nov) : Jets released K Riley Patterson and signed K Anders Carlson to the practice squad.
wpr (8-Nov) : Thanks guys
Mucky Tundra (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday wpr!
Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Anders Carlson ... released by 49ers
dfosterf (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday!😊😊😊
wpr (7-Nov) : Thanks Kevin.
Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday, Wayne! πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚πŸ₯³
beast (7-Nov) : Edge Rushers is the same... it's not the 4-3 vs 3-4 change, it's the Hafley's version of the 4-3... as all 32 teams are actually 4-2
Zero2Cool (6-Nov) : OLB to DE and player requests trade. Yet folks say they are same.
beast (5-Nov) : In other news, the Green Bay Packers have signed Zero2Cool to update their website πŸ˜‹ jk
beast (5-Nov) : Might just re-sign the kicker we got
beast (5-Nov) : Are there any kickers worth drafting next year?
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Preston Smith for Malik Willis
Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Getting a 7th rounder from the Stillers
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : At least we get 7th round pick now!! HELLO NEW KICKER
Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Steelers getting a premier lockdown corner!
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Packers are trading edge rusher Preston Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers, per sources.
Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Preston Smith traded to the Steelers!!!!
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : CB Marshon Lattimore to Commanders
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.
Martha Careful (5-Nov) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe
hardrocker950 (4-Nov) : Seems the Saints are always in cap hell
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Saints HC job is not an envious one; gonna be in cap hell for 3 years
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Dennis Allen has now been fired twice mid-season with Derek Carr as his starting QB
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Kuhn let go
beast (4-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers would have any interest in Z. Smith, probably not
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Shefter says Browns and Lions will figure out how to get a deal done for Za'Darius Smith..
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
43m / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

58m / Green Bay Packers Talk / civic

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

11-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / joepacker

8-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

5-Nov / GameDay Threads / Cheesey

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Copyright Β© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comβ„’. All Rights Reserved.