Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Just read a story about Roger Clemens getting indicted for lying to and "obstruction" of Congress.

I'm not a fan of Clemens. And I'm sure there's a law on the books to the effect that one can't obstruct Congress.

But my question is a bit different: should it be against the law to lie to a Congressional committee.

Or, if you want to get even more radical, why should a Congressional committee have the power to issue subpoenas?

Discuss.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Presidents do it all the time.

Let me add, so do heads of major corporations. I'd love to see the people who did scare tactics to get Congress to vote for the bailouts get indicted for lying.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Porforis
14 years ago

Presidents do it all the time.

Let me add, so do heads of major corporations. I'd love to see the people who did scare tactics to get Congress to vote for the bailouts get indicted for lying.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Lying to congress is one thing, lying while under oath before a congressional committee is another thing.
4PackGirl
14 years ago
i find it rather ironic that they don't enjoy being lied to. politicians=liars. nuff said.
IronMan
14 years ago

Presidents do it all the time.

Let me add, so do heads of major corporations. I'd love to see the people who did scare tactics to get Congress to vote for the bailouts get indicted for lying.

"Porforis" wrote:



Lying to congress is one thing, lying while under oath before a congressional committee is another thing.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

This.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Should lying under oath generally be a crime, then?

Or is there something special about doing so when Congress administers the oath. Should Congress be able to have oath-breaking enforced more than the rest of us?

Perjury is essentially lying under oath. But there is a difference between lying under oath to a court of law (to which under our constitution gives the judicial power) and lying under oath to you or me (to whom it doesn't). I can sue you for breach of your promise if we have a contractual relationship, but that's a civil matter not a criminal one the way perjury is.

Why is lying under oath to Congress more like lying to the court under oath than it is like lying to me under oath? And should it be?

I don't think the answer is at all obvious here. And I personally would argue that criminalizing lying to congress, under oath or otherwise, is the wrong side of the fence. For two reasons.

First, Congress, unlike me, has an intimate relationship with the executive "enforcement" wing of the state -- they make the laws that enable enforcement of their legislative will. In short, they can by the nature of what they do put the threat of force behind their will -- they don't need yet another threat-making ability of "obstruction".

Think of what would happen if someone refuses to testify to Congress under oath. Can you say "no, thanks, sorry, not today" without being thought of having something evil to hide? I don't think so. The only people who do that are criminals and unpatriotic slugs. And Congresscritters, like the bullies they are, like all bullies, are going to encourage with their control over the big elevated chairs and the ears of every network microphone for us to think just that.

When an essential part of political participation should be the ability to say "none of your fucking business." If I'm a criminal, it's not the legislature's job to bring me to justice and make me talk. It's the judicial system.

Second, Congressional committees aren't "fact finders" the way the courts are. They aren't bound by rules of civil and criminal procedure, or by the Federal Rules of Evidence. They are politicians with agendas. They are not disinterested appliers of the law. Their interest is not with applying the law to the facts, their interest is making the laws. Usually in lines with their particular biases and ideologies and interests.

Judges are not unbiased or free of these problems of course. But unlike congresscritters, they don't decide civil cases, much less criminal ones, as advocates. Congressmen and Congresswomen do.

Morally, should I be expected to tell the truth. Sure. To everyone.

Legally, should I be subject to jail if I lie under oath. No.

Not unless the person I'm lying to is "someone special". Like a court.

IMO, Congressional committees fail to meet the basic "someone special" requirement.

Not unless your definition of someone special is "fertilizer producer."
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
So in a nutshell, Wade, you would argue that Congress should not be able to hand out subpoenas because it is not, in fact, a judicial body? I can buy that argument. When were the first congressional subpoenas handed out, and has this practice ever been challenged (and defended) in court?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

So in a nutshell, Wade, you would argue that Congress should not be able to hand out subpoenas because it is not, in fact, a judicial body? I can buy that argument. When were the first congressional subpoenas handed out, and has this practice ever been challenged (and defended) in court?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



On the historical question, I do not know. Though "lying to the king" has long been considered a crime. And I don't think it has been limited to lying to the king when he acts in his judicial capacity. :)

As for your first question. I'm about 96 percent there. I am open to people explaining why "not just" judicial bodies should have subpoena power (which is part of the reason I started the thread). But I don't know what the other grounds would be.

Because it seems to me they would have to get past one of the big reasons we have separation of powers and of functions in the American system: namely, that those who make rules like to set up rules so that they get their own way.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (3h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (3h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (3h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (5h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (7h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (7h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (7h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (8h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (8h) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (8h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (8h) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (8h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (8h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16h / Around The NFL / beast

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.