Jacob
15 years ago
i think drivers gonna do better than you have him, apparently he feels great compared to the last few years due to his leg injury, but i can see why hed drop down due to age.
porky88
  • porky88
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Driver's numbers drop due to the emergence of Finley. There is only so much pie everyone can have.
PackerTraxx
15 years ago

What about Jordy Nelson?

"DGB454" wrote:



I'd be interested in that stat also. Mostly because I like him better than Jones.

"yooperfan" wrote:



I 3rd it , surprised nothing on Jordy. IMO Jones and Jordy are important to our present, 3 and 4 receiver sets, and our future. This is more important if Driver doesn't come back better. Hopefully his knees allow him to do so. He also has to cut down on his drops from last year.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago
These stats are interesting, at least they give you something to ponder in this slow time of the year.

Based on your projections Porky, it would seem that last year was an extraordinary year from A-Rod. In fact, it would seem the projections indicate that our offense as a whole isn't as dynamic as it was last year.

I'm intrigued as to the limits of your projection, though. Can you do projections for things like completion percentage? Or most intriguing of all, although no doubt much more difficult (even improbable?), would be projecting the performance of the O-line.

I guess what I'm intrigued with is trying to get at why the projections indicate the Packers O and Rodgers decreasing from their output last year. I'd think having been together a few years, having healthy solid Tackles, and most of all Rodgers entering the prime of his career with a heck of a lot of practice and game reps in this system indicate to me that the best is still yet to come.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Rockmolder
15 years ago

These stats are interesting, at least they give you something to ponder in this slow time of the year.

Based on your projections Porky, it would seem that last year was an extraordinary year from A-Rod. In fact, it would seem the projections indicate that our offense as a whole isn't as dynamic as it was last year.

I'm intrigued as to the limits of your projection, though. Can you do projections for things like completion percentage? Or most intriguing of all, although no doubt much more difficult (even improbable?), would be projecting the performance of the O-line.

I guess what I'm intrigued with is trying to get at why the projections indicate the Packers O and Rodgers decreasing from their output last year. I'd think having been together a few years, having healthy solid Tackles, and most of all Rodgers entering the prime of his career with a heck of a lot of practice and game reps in this system indicate to me that the best is still yet to come.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



That's a good point.

And this is not just in Porky's prediction, but just about everyone's that I've seen. Rodgers' TDs and yards go down slightly, while his ints go up by as much as 100%.

Nearly everyone seems to be using a combination of 2008 and 2009 and then going with the averages, rather than continuing the line of improvement. We'll see which way it goes.
porky88
  • porky88
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
My projections are basically about telling the person to select Player A over Player B. The stats are the reason why you should select Player A over Player B.

Stats are just stats. They mean a lot in fantasy football, which these are for, but they don't define the player IMO. You have to separate fantasy from reality. I think Rodgers will be better this year. His numbers just might not be.

Last year was an amazing season for offenses. I think it's going to be tough for most teams to duplicate their offensive output from last season. I have Favre's numbers coming back to earth a little bit. I have Romo throwing more than 9 INTs. I have Brees throwing fewer touchdowns. Manning is really the only consistent QB, but get this, he's No. 4 in total points behind Rodgers, Brees, and Rivers.

Defenses always catch up too.

Yes I project completion percentage. No I don't take into account the play of the offensive line. I look at the individuals because it's fantasy football. The line is a unit. My numbers are also not averages for Rodgers or that's not how I did it.

29 TDs and 10 INTs with over 4,000-plus yards is ridiculous. I think it's more likely to see that, than I think it's likely you'll see Rodgers' touchdowns go up with INTs remaining the same or dropping. I apply this logic to games played as well. Matt Schaub played in every game last year. His numbers say he should be a top five and maybe top three fantasy QB. However, the trend says he won't play in every game. The trend says he's much more likely to play 14 games than 16. I give him a 14 game projection and he's No. 7 overall instead.

You also have to remember that in reality, football is a situational sport. Rodgers threw for 2,179 yards over the final eight games last season. He threw 14 touchdowns.

GBs record was 7-1.

He threw 2255 yards and 16 touchdowns in the first half of the season.

GBs record was 4-4.

Part of that was GB playing catchup and part of that was playcalling. Still, it's a direct indicator that you shouldn't take these numbers as a prelude to what you may expect out of the Packers this year.
porky88
  • porky88
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
By popular demand....

Jordy Nelson

30 receptions
422 yards
2 touchdowns



This is over 16 games. He projects at about 14 yards per reception. That's a lot YAC or he'll be involved in more plays down the field.

For the record. Based on trend, there is no way all five receiving threats play in every game this year. Someone will go down, which obviously effects these numbers. My guess is it's highly unlikely that both James Jones and Jordy Nelson stay healthy over the course of the season. Both seem to be a little more prone to injury and Nelson is also probably going to play special teams, which leaves him even more vulnerable.
RaiderPride
15 years ago
Rodgers will throw for 5,085 yards in 2010

That all important "Last Yard" will be from extra effort, from a Jennings spin move on the last play of the regular season.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
zombieslayer
15 years ago

Rodgers will throw for 5,085 yards in 2010

That all important "Last Yard" will be from extra effort, from a Jennings spin move on the last play of the regular season.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



RP - That can be taken another way.

Throwing for 5000 yards often means the enemy is either still in the game or has the lead and we're playing catch up. I'd much rather see Aaron throw for 4000 yards and Grant getting 18 rushing TDs. The latter stats are more like the stats for a 14-2 team.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Rodgers will throw for 5,085 yards in 2010

That all important "Last Yard" will be from extra effort, from a Jennings spin move on the last play of the regular season.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



RP - That can be taken another way.

Throwing for 5000 yards often means the enemy is either still in the game or has the lead and we're playing catch up. I'd much rather see Aaron throw for 4000 yards and Grant getting 18 rushing TDs. The latter stats are more like the stats for a 14-2 team.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



Or a team that plays to their strengths, rather than play chicken football when they get in front.
Fan Shout
beast (9h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (9h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (14h) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (14h) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (15h) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (15h) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (15h) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (19h) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (19h) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd
Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.
Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!
Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste
Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.
beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.
beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe
Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

18h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

20h / Fantasy Sports Talk / packerfanoutwest

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

28-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

28-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.