Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Again, I'm far more worried about having a dominating defense that puts our offense in good field position and an offense that finishes off drives with touchdowns, so we don't have to resort to kicking field goals, than having a field goal kicker with a stratospheric completion percentage.

If our biggest complaint about this team is our kicker's completion numbers, I say that's a good problem to have.
UserPostedImage
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

I remember Ryan's last year here, he was pretty inconsistent, and there were lots of fans squawking for him to be replaced. And he was. And now those same fans are screaming that cutting him was one of Thompson's biggest mistakes. You're never guaranteed that bringing in someone new will make things better. It's not uncommon for things to get worse.

If Crosby's problems were having a significant impact on this team's success, I'd say, sure, replace him. But I don't think it's worth trying to replace the kicker who was 6th in the league in completed field goals and 4th in the league in completed PATs. He scored 129 points for us last year. You can count on one hand the number of kickers in the league who scored more points than Mason Crosby.

So we bring in a kicker with a higher completion percentage but an overall lower scoring contribution. How does that benefit the team?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


Apples and oranges. Ryan's inconsistancy was greatly exaggerated. He had one bad game, vs the Bears, in 2006, in tornado like conditions. He also had the best net average of any Packers punter in over 20 years.

And I couldn't care less that Mason was 4th in the league in PATs. That just means we scored a lot of tds, which he had absolutely nothing to do with.
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Again, I'm far more worried about having a dominating defense that puts our offense in good field position and an offense that finishes off drives with touchdowns, so we don't have to resort to kicking field goals, than having a field goal kicker with a stratospheric completion percentage.

If our biggest complaint about this team is our kicker's completion numbers, I say that's a good problem to have.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



47 Wide Right.

Eventually, you're going to face a team that's close to your skill. If that team is an offensive juggernaut with little defense, I can totally agree with your point, but if you face, for instance, the Baltimore Ravens, you're going to need those 6-9 points that your kicker will put on the board.

Now I think that this will work itsself out. Crosby isn't as bad as people make him out to be. I think that he deserves this year, uncontested, to prove himself. Show that he can get more accurate. Last year was the first year coming off a different kicking style. This year, it should all come together.
Pack93z
14 years ago

Active kickers - Career Numbers

One thing to note.. is beyond the Montana wonder and two others.. there aren't many young kickers above 80%. And Crosby is very young on that list... but the number of plus 30 yo kickers is interesting.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/fg_perc_active.htm 



Rank  	Player  (age), + - HOFer, Bold - Active  	FG%  	Years  	Teams
1. 	Nate Kaeding (27) 	87.209% 	 2004-2009  	sdg
2. 	Dan Carpenter (24) 	86.792% 	 2008-2009  	mia
3. 	Robbie Gould (27) 	85.897% 	 2005-2009  	chi
4. 	Shayne Graham (32) 	85.217% 	 2001-2009  	3TM
5. 	Stephen Gostkowski (25) 	85.124% 	 2006-2009  	nwe
6. 	Rob Bironas (31) 	84.472% 	 2005-2009  	oti
7. 	Matt Stover (41) 	83.659% 	 1991-2009  	3TM
8. 	Phil Dawson (34) 	83.273% 	 1999-2009  	cle
9. 	Jeff Reed (30) 	83.260% 	 2002-2009  	pit
10. 	Ryan Longwell (35) 	82.990% 	 1997-2009  	2TM
11. 	John Carney (45) 	82.404% 	 1988-2009  	7TM
12. 	Adam Vinatieri (37) 	82.039% 	 1996-2009  	2TM
13. 	Jason Hanson (39) 	81.801% 	 1992-2009  	det
14. 	Jay Feely (33) 	81.625% 	 2001-2009  	4TM
15. 	David Akers (35) 	81.620% 	 1998-2009  	2TM
16. 	John Kasay (40) 	81.600% 	 1991-2009  	2TM
17. 	Matt Bryant (34) 	81.461% 	 2002-2009  	5TM
18. 	Olindo Mare (36) 	81.233% 	 1997-2009  	3TM
19. 	Josh Brown (30) 	80.976% 	 2003-2009  	2TM
20. 	Lawrence Tynes (31) 	80.952% 	 2004-2009  	2TM
21. 	Rian Lindell (32) 	80.903% 	 2000-2009  	2TM
22. 	Jason Elam (39) 	80.741% 	 1993-2009  	2TM
23. 	Joe Nedney (36) 	80.065% 	 1996-2009  	7TM
24. 	Shaun Suisham (28) 	79.091% 	 2005-2009  	2TM
25. 	Nick Folk (25) 	79.012% 	 2007-2009  	dal
26. 	Mike Nugent (27) 	79.000% 	 2005-2009  	3TM
27. 	Sebastian Janikowski (31) 	78.425% 	 2000-2009  	rai
28. 	Neil Rackers (33) 	78.244% 	 2000-2009  	2TM
29. 	Mason Crosby (25) 	77.982% 	 2007-2009  	gnb
30. 	Kris Brown (33) 	77.301% 	 1999-2009  	2TM
31. 	Josh Scobee (27) 	76.730% 	 2004-2009  	jax
32. 	Matt Prater (25) 	76.712% 	 2007-2009  	2TM
33. 	Billy Cundiff (29) 	73.585% 	 2002-2009  	4TM

"pack93z" wrote:



Okay... to make the point that Non is asking for.. note above where Crosby's career percentage ranks... 77.98%

Are there other factors.. sure there are.. but you don't see a correlation?



G  	W  	L  	Win %	FGM  	FGA  	FG%  	Pt Margin
20	9	11	45%	35	46	76.10%	<7
12	7	5	58%	21	28	75.00%	8 to 10
15	14	1	93%	29	35	82.90%	>10

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

I think that he deserves this year, uncontested, to prove himself.

"Rockmolder" wrote:


Ok, I can't take it any more. What the hell is all this bullshit that we can't bring anyone in for competition, for the fear that he may get rattled, or it would hurt his feelings?

This is the NFL. It is BUILT on competition. This isn't the fucking Girl Scouts. For fucks sake.

Vince Lombardi just turned in his grave.
PackerTraxx
14 years ago
I would at least bring in another kicker or 2 for competition. It may make him better or we may find a better kicker. The competition wouldn't worry me. If he can't handle the competition how is he going to handle a game winning field goal with seconds left.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Pack93z
14 years ago
BTW... I highly doubt the Packers don't bring in at least another camp leg.. if nothing else to cut down the reps on Crosby.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Only 3 kickers in the league attempted more kicks from 50 or more yards than Crosby last year. None of them had nearly the overall attempts Crosby had -- Josh Scobee attempted 50% of Crosby's total kicks. You get put in the position of having to kick more often, you're also going to miss more often. You guys are ignoring factors such as weather, etc. that factor into a kicker's completion percentage. Without exception, all kickers who were better from 50 yards than Crosby came from warm-weather or indoor teams: Jacksonville, Oakland, Tennessee, Seattle.

Only one kicker (Akers) attempted more kicks than Crosby last year, and he only attempted 3 from 50 yards or more. Whether you want to admit it or not, Mike McCarthy puts Crosby in a position to fail in a way almost no other kicker has to experience. He's the most overexposed kicker in the league. Not only is he kicking more than almost any kicker around, he's also kicking in some of the worst conditions around.

Beef up our offense so we don't have so many 4th and longs, and Crosby won't look so bad.

Again, I'm not opposed to finding a better kicker, but I think a far bigger priority is ensuring our offense completes drives and our defense gives our offense a chance to start with decent field position. Let's use our meager 80 roster slots on those issues. After we're solid along the lines, then we can worry about wasting roster spots on kickers.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
By Month..

Month	G  	W  	L  	FGM  	FGA  	FG%  	Pts
SEPT	11	8	3	19	23	82.60%	89
OCT	9	6	3	16	21	76.20%	71
NOV	15	8	7	31	38	81.60%	139
DEC	11	7	4	18	26	69.20%	90
JAN	1	1	0	1	1	100.00%	7

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
That is for Crosby, I presume?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (15h) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (20h) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (21h) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (21h) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (22h) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.