Rockmolder
14 years ago
Juicy rumors are always welcome.

I'm still a little hestitant to trade picks away in this deep a draft, but you don't get a chance to get a Brandon Marshall every day.
14 years ago
Brandon Marshall, eh? Interesting. I was thinking this thread was just speculation via boredom, so I never even popped in here. I'd welcome both of those rumors. Holy fuck that would be awesome. But could we keep BOTH Finley and Marshall's egos in check? Shit. I suppose if any team in the NFL could do it, we could ("Oh really? You're having issues, Brandon? I'll see you after practice. Have fun shoveling the parking lot.")

lulz.

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Please lay off on the "Packer people" bullshit. Was Charles Woodson "Packer people" when he came to town? No. Is Johnny Jolly "Packer people"? I don't think so. How about "Daryn Colledge"? He's a whiny bitch. Hell, even B.J. Raji has a questionable past. Ted Thompson does not place the premium on character so many Packers fans have deluded themselves into thinking. Think about it: He agonized over the choice between Raji and Crabtree last year -- is Crabtree "Packer people"?

Yes, we all like Nelson and Jones because we drafted them, but if we can get one of the best receivers in the league for cheap, there is absolutely no reason why we shouldn't pull the trigger. Certainly not on the basis of their putative "Packer peopleness" or lack thereof. Imagine how quickly Rodgers could get the ball out if he had Finley, Jennings, Marshall, and Driver (perhaps even Westbrook!) as available options. It would be virtually impossible that on any given play, all of them would be covered. If you have open receivers, you don't need the greatest line in the world, as Kurt Warner proved time and time again.

I say make the deal. Packer people be damned.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Please lay off on the "Packer people" bullshit. Was Charles Woodson "Packer people" when he came to town? No. Is Johnny Jolly "Packer people"? I don't think so. How about "Daryn Colledge"? He's a whiny bitch. Hell, even B.J. Raji has a questionable past. Ted Thompson does not place the premium on character so many Packers fans have deluded themselves into thinking. Think about it: He agonized over the choice between Raji and Crabtree last year -- is Crabtree "Packer people"?

Yes, we all like Nelson and Jones because we drafted them, but if we can get one of the best receivers in the league for cheap, there is absolutely no reason why we shouldn't pull the trigger. Certainly not on the basis of their putative "Packer peopleness" or lack thereof. Imagine how quickly Rodgers could get the ball out if he had Finley, Jennings, Marshall, and Driver (perhaps even Westbrook!) as available options. It would be virtually impossible that on any given play, all of them would be covered. If you have open receivers, you don't need the greatest line in the world, as Kurt Warner proved time and time again.

I say make the deal. Packer people be damned.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



What trouble did Charles Woodson get into?
Jolly was already ON the team when his stupid stuff happened.
Colledge? Wow, dude you need to get off your damn horse bro, it's a squabble over his contract and playing time. Yeah, that makes him a bad guy.
What did Crabtree do? And now we're going to blast the GM for CONSIDERING taking a player? Can you REACH a bit more here?

If you're going to play ignorant on what the damn meaning of "Packer People" is, at least use have of your damn genius brain.

You're best two arguments against the GOAL of acquiring PACKER PEOPLE would be Koren Robinson and if you want to be picky, B.J. Raji because of his admitted weed smoking which I think was one time, maybe more.

I can't believe how fucking pigheaded some people are with this whole PACKER PEOPLE thing. No team is ever going to outright say "we want to bring on troubled players to our team". The closest you'll hear is "we dont care about the off the field stuff as long as it doesn't effect them on the field".



He mentions Charles freaking Woodson as non Packer People prior to signing??? Un. Forking. BELIEVABLE.




Listen folks, the Packers said they want PACKER PEOPLE. Stop taking it so damn literal. The Packers are building a football team, not a damn choir class. Men, especially young men make poor decisions. Who hasn't? What builds them into men is LEARNING from those mistakes. You have made a mistake. I've made a mistake. Does that mean we're not Packer People? You've wanted more money from your employer. I've wanted more money from my employer. Does that mean we're not Packer people? No, it means were HUMAN BEINGS!

If there's two players, equally talented in the same position, one of which is more of a 'bad boy' than the other, the Packers will steer towards the one with less drama. MOST teams do this.


/whiny bitch rant off
UserPostedImage
14 years ago
wait. i'm confused. didn't you two just basically agree with each other and say nearly the same thing?

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I've hardly ever read an article about Woodson that didn't mention him as a risk because a) injury past and b) character questions. I don't know if the problems were strictly attitudinal or what (ala Randy Moss), but he apparently had something of a "bad boy" reputation.

As for Jolly's issues occurring after he came to the Packers, what's your point? If Thompson were really so concerned about "Packer people" as people on this board like to think, wouldn't Thompson have fired him as soon as he became a PR liability, as some of the more skittish of GMs in this league do? The fact is he hasn't, despite the fact that Jolly's charges have been refiled and his case has dragged on for the better part of two years.

Again, what's your point on Daryn Colledge? The fact is he's not always a good little soldier who says "Thank you, sir, may I have another?" He's pretty vocal in the media. I never said nor implied he got into any trouble. But he's done as much as some of the other players that are strongly opposed on this board for talking too much.

Koren Robinson is a great example. I could have brought him up, but I was running out of time as I was late to class. Another example is Randy Moss, the trade for whom many people opposed because of his supposed character flaws, even though he's never been in trouble off the field. But Ted Thompson did attempt to trade for him.

There are probably other examples too. My only point is that Ted Thompson is not nearly as obsessed with pristine character as some of the people seem to think who have taken that phrase "Packer people" entirely too literally.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
14 years ago

I've hardly ever read an article about Woodson that didn't mention him as a risk because a) injury past and b) character questions. I don't know if the problems were strictly attitudinal or what (ala Randy Moss), but he apparently had something of a "bad boy" reputation.

As for Jolly's issues occurring after he came to the Packers, what's your point? If Thompson were really so concerned about "Packer people" as people on this board like to think, wouldn't Thompson have fired him as soon as he became a PR liability, as some of the more skittish of GMs in this league do? The fact is he hasn't, despite the fact that Jolly's charges have been refiled and his case has dragged on for the better part of two years.

Again, what's your point on Daryn Colledge? The fact is he's not always a good little soldier who says "Thank you, sir, may I have another?" He's pretty vocal in the media. I never said nor implied he got into any trouble. But he's done as much as some of the other players that are strongly opposed on this board for talking too much.

Koren Robinson is a great example. I could have brought him up, but I was running out of time as I was late to class. Another example is Randy Moss, the trade for whom many people opposed because of his supposed character flaws, even though he's never been in trouble off the field. But Ted Thompson did attempt to trade for him.

There are probably other examples too. My only point is that Ted Thompson is not nearly as obsessed with pristine character as some of the people seem to think who have taken that phrase "Packer people" entirely too literally.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:





not that i was ever opposed to the idea of acquiring randy moss but to say he never had any problems off the field is a little inaccurate. There was that 1 time he pushed a cop down the street with his car and also many other comments he made to the media
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
If that's true, it provides even stronger support to my point. 🙂
UserPostedImage
blueleopard
14 years ago
Our receiving options make the Packers' offense virtually unstoppable. All Aaron Rodgers needs is an offensive line, because I truly believe he's already a perennial Pro Bowl player in this conference.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Brettizzle
14 years ago
I would love this but I really don't see it happening
Jermichael Finley

We will be in Indianapolis

Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (2h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (2h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (13h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (18h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (21h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.