While I don't disagree that some parts of the city shouldn't be rebuilt, it still doesn't minimize the loss that they suffered... especially when the city and state governments sold them false hope of being protected by the levy systems and allowed to occupy the area in the first place.
But we could say this about several areas of the country that shouldn't be built upon.. hell the entire part of southern California could be deemed an area like that. Hell.. even La Crosse is a flood plain and has commissioned several studies on the topic.. yet many still choose to call it home.
Simple point is.. it is good for the region down there.. an if you think the lower wards were the only places devastated by the hurricane.. I think you might want to take a trip to the region itself before laying such a level of criticism upon those folks globally.
I make sure to tell my aunt and uncle that just returned on another church mission down there for the past two weeks of donating time to help common folks rebuild that they are wasting their time.. as these are just "pig headed" folks that don't deserve the help in rebuilding their homes.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"