It also continues to leave the middle of the field open for an elite QB to eat us.
"blueleopard" wrote:
You know, idiotic comments like these are getting to me now. Newsflash: against the Steelers and Cards in the playoffs, Kampman did not play because he was injured.
Put simply, you are confusing a possibility of something happening with the idea that it must have happened.
Kampman is not the first guy you want to cover someone - I get that.
Pray tell, though, when exactly have you seen Kampman drop into coverage and get beaten the past season? I'll make it easy for you: just give me one instance of this happening.
Fact is, people are mistakenly making a leap of logic by assuming if something could happen, then it did happen.
Kampman's first job in this defence is to attack from the LOS. Be it versus a run play or a pass play, he will primarily be responsible for crossing the LOS and attacking the RT (and whichever other play should be helping him the RT out).
Because Kampman dropped into coverage, people assume he must have given up a big play. Someone please point out the game this happens.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.