Porforis
15 years ago
http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/15/news/companies/bofa_lewis_salary/index.htm?postversion=2009101519 

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- In the past, Bank of America Chief Executive Officer Ken Lewis has received an annual salary of $1.5 million. But this year he will get nothing.

That means no salary, no bonuses. In fact, he will have to repay Bank of America Corp. (BAC, Fortune 500) the more than $1 million he has already earned in his final year on the job.

Lewis agreed to the deal on Thursday after the Treasury department's pay czar, Kenneth Feinberg, "suggested" it to him, said Bob Stickler, a spokesman for the bank.

Stickler added that Lewis "felt it was not in the best interest of Bank of America or him to get into a dispute with the pay master."


Lewis, who announced last month that he will retire at the year's end, will still have $53 million in pension benefits waiting for him. The outgoing chief will also have other stock awards and deferred compensation for a total $69 million payout, said Stickler.

Feinberg does not have authority to modify compensation awarded before 2009, which includes Lewis' retirement package and stock holdings from a four-decade career at the bank.

But Stickler asked, "Since when does law apply to this administration?" As a result, he said Bank of America is unsure whether or not Lewis' retirement package is under review by the government.

Wall Street has been waiting for Feinberg to announce rules on compensation at the seven firms that have received large government loans last year as the financial system neared collapse. And while firms are expecting Feinberg to crack down on payouts, a complete cut is bold.

The deal comes before the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank announces its third-quarter earnings on Friday morning. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expect earnings per share to decrease by 21 cents from a year ago when they were flat.



I really can't bring myself to believe that this is America. Pro or anti Obama, can someone give me one good reason why it is the role of government to directly dictate people's pay, especially in this kind of borderline threatening manner?
4PackGirl
15 years ago
my guess would be that BOA was involved in the bank bailout plan?

i've worked in banking most of my life. i've observed from within.

big bank mentality is - have the peon's cross-sell products to our customers, puffing up our bottom lines, satisfy the stockholders so they won't mind it so much when i get my multi-million dollar bonus each year.

oh - the bank's in trouble & profits are down? well then let's get rid of the people who actually KNOW finance & hire salespeople. we can get them cheaper & they'll sell more so once again nobody will even notice my big ole bonus each year.

now we're being investigated for not following federal rules for lending? uhhh well let's fire those idiot salespeople - who wanted THEM in the first place anyway? we don't need to replace them - just make the ones left work twice as hard. that will save us tens of thousands in salaries & perhaps i can STILL get away with my bonus this year.

nobody wants less government more than me BUT what's the solution to these greedy mofo's??
IronMan
15 years ago

BUT what's the solution to these greedy mofo's??

"4PackGirl" wrote:



They need to give the money to me. I will spend it wisely on things like beer, strippers, and going to football games!
4PackGirl
15 years ago

BUT what's the solution to these greedy mofo's??

"IronMan" wrote:



They need to give the money to me. I will spend it wisely on things like beer, strippers, and going to football games!

"4PackGirl" wrote:



woot - good call!! 😉
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

BUT what's the solution to these greedy mofo's??

"4PackGirl" wrote:



They need to give the money to me. I will spend it wisely on things like beer, strippers, and going to football games!

"IronMan" wrote:



woot - good call!! ;)

"4PackGirl" wrote:



She just saw a new customer with one of those options ... and I don't mean beer, or football games.


POW!!
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago


They need to give the money to me. I will spend it wisely on things like beer, strippers, and going to football games!

"IronMan" wrote:



Heh. At least that money will go to Americans. :thumbright:
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
zombieslayer
15 years ago



I really can't bring myself to believe that this is America. Pro or anti Obama, can someone give me one good reason why it is the role of government to directly dictate people's pay, especially in this kind of borderline threatening manner?

"Porforis" wrote:



Really? I can't believe my country gave these idiots $700 BILLION. He shouldn't get a God damn penny as far as I'm concerned and I'm glad he's having to pay back his salary. His salary is coming out of MY pocket.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Porforis
15 years ago



I really can't bring myself to believe that this is America. Pro or anti Obama, can someone give me one good reason why it is the role of government to directly dictate people's pay, especially in this kind of borderline threatening manner?

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Really? I can't believe my country gave these idiots $700 BILLION. He shouldn't get a God damn penny as far as I'm concerned and I'm glad he's having to pay back his salary. His salary is coming out of MY pocket.

"Porforis" wrote:



Is it the Bank of America's fault that they were given 700 billion dollars of your money, or the government's? Did the government have a role in creating the problem in the first place? I'm not saying that this guy should make 15 million dollars, or that banks don't take too much profits. My main problem is, where do we draw the line between protecting the consumer and allowing the free market to be free?

Is it wise to have someone that does not need to be elected (a czar) to be able to modify the pay of anybody in the banking industry? Should the government be able to "fire" a CEO of a company? Do you trust the Bank of America to be able to manage their money better than the government?

These are all important questions that I think everyone should consider. Every day I read a new article about ten more things the government wants to regulate or change. We're not all going to agree on what the role of government should be, but I hope we can all realize that this is nothing at all like our founding fathers intended.
zombieslayer
15 years ago
Porfois - Yes, good questions. But let's not forget, it's still our money, not BoA's.

I'm not happy about any of it and wish our stupid government just let those banks fail. Take the 2k hit in the DOW and let the smaller banks and credit unions who were NOT lending money to people without jobs start kicking these corrupt banks' asses. My credit union was turning out profit after profit, despite the recessions. It's simply because they only lent to people who could make the payments.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Formo
15 years ago
This is one of those issues.. Yes, something needs to be done about the greedy corporate CEOs, etc... But Big Government is NOT the answer. The more power you give to them, the less we have. And you are fooling yourself if you think the government will be willing to give the power back... They are as greedy as those corporate CEOs.

I don't know what can be done, as long as we don't just push it aside and let the government 'handle' things.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (2h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (9h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (10h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (17h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.