DakotaT
15 years ago
Since I live among many alcoholic mullet wearing cowboys, his celebrations don't really bother me. What bothers me is the pad level at which our O-line is playing with. Jesus Christ boys, grab his facemask and push, like Loadholt gets to.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
15 years ago
It doesn't bother me.
If our guys were doing their job, we wouldn't SEE it.
So i blame the Packers for that.
UserPostedImage
Formo
15 years ago

Since I live among many alcoholic mullet wearing cowboys, his celebrations don't really bother me. What bothers me is the pad level at which our O-line is playing with. Jesus Christ boys, grab his facemask and push, like Loadholt gets to.

"DakotaT" wrote:



You saw that too? lol Huge wingspan of Loadholt, and he catches not one, but two Packer rushers in the face with his paws. It was impressive, not considering it was illegal. I was surprised he wasn't called on that.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DakotaT
15 years ago


You saw that too? lol Huge wingspan of Loadholt, and he catches not one, but two Packer rushers in the face with his paws. It was impressive, not considering it was illegal. I was surprised he wasn't called on that.

"Formo" wrote:




Please Formo, your O-line gets away with more holding than Al and and Chuck, and that's a lot of fricken holding. Man for man they're really not that good but if the flags never fly than keep doing what your doing. It gives me a nice platform in which to piss from.
UserPostedImage
Formo
15 years ago


You saw that too? lol Huge wingspan of Loadholt, and he catches not one, but two Packer rushers in the face with his paws. It was impressive, not considering it was illegal. I was surprised he wasn't called on that.

"DakotaT" wrote:




Please Formo, your O-line gets away with more holding than Al and and Chuck, and that's a lot of fricken holding. Man for man they're really not that good but if the flags never fly than keep doing what your doing. It gives me a nice platform in which to piss from.

"Formo" wrote:



I think it pretty much evens out.

Mr. Sour Grapes. 😃
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DakotaT
15 years ago


I think it pretty much evens out.

Mr. Sour Grapes. =D

"Formo" wrote:




B. S. my good man, they throw flags on Al and Chuck. I think the flying V formation also needs a flag once in a while. Pretty soon those fat bastards are going to side by side with Peterson.
UserPostedImage
Formo
15 years ago


I think it pretty much evens out.

Mr. Sour Grapes. =D

"DakotaT" wrote:




B. S. my good man, they throw flags on Al and Chuck.

"Formo" wrote:



Well, yeah. Of course they do. Al and Chuckles have a history of mugging WRs, eventually they will get caught. And they still get away with it at times.

I think the flying V formation also needs a flag once in a while. Pretty soon those fat bastards are going to side by side with Peterson.

"DakotaT" wrote:



What? This went waaay over my melon.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Rockmolder
15 years ago


I think it pretty much evens out.

Mr. Sour Grapes. =D

"Formo" wrote:




B. S. my good man, they throw flags on Al and Chuck.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Well, yeah. Of course they do. Al and Chuckles have a history of mugging WRs, eventually they will get caught. And they still get away with it at times.

"Formo" wrote:



Which means that they're overcalling them from time to time. When Bailey or Winfield gets his hand on someone, they don't care too much. When Woodson, Harris or, for example, Roy Williams gets his hand on someone, they're going to throw that flag far earlier.

Pretty much the reverse Brett Favre effect. (As to intentional grounding etc)

I think the flying V formation also needs a flag once in a while. Pretty soon those fat bastards are going to side by side with Peterson.

"Formo" wrote:



What? This went waaay over my melon.

"DakotaT" wrote:



I asume that he means that you're playing a borderline illegal formation with your tackles nearly standing in the backfield and your guards on the place that your tackles should be.
Formo
15 years ago


I think it pretty much evens out.

Mr. Sour Grapes. =D

"Rockmolder" wrote:




B. S. my good man, they throw flags on Al and Chuck.

"Formo" wrote:



Well, yeah. Of course they do. Al and Chuckles have a history of mugging WRs, eventually they will get caught. And they still get away with it at times.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Which means that they're overcalling them from time to time. When Bailey or Winfield gets his hand on someone, they don't care too much. When Woodson, Harris or, for example, Roy Williams gets his hand on someone, they're going to throw that flag far earlier.

Pretty much the reverse Brett Favre effect. (As to intentional grounding etc)

"Formo" wrote:



I think it's mostly on the refreeing crew than the team playing.. Some crews let the players play more so than others. This isn't a conspiracy against the Packers CBs, if that's what you guys are implying.

I think the flying V formation also needs a flag once in a while. Pretty soon those fat bastards are going to side by side with Peterson.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



What? This went waaay over my melon.

"Formo" wrote:



I asume that he means that you're playing a borderline illegal formation with your tackles nearly standing in the backfield and your guards on the place that your tackles should be.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Ahhh! I agree that's an odd formation. But c'mon.. That just gives the play away to the defense that it's almost a given it's going to be a pass play. They NEED those tackles back that far if they want to stop the outside rush (just look at the history of Kampman vs. McKinney). But, I'd rather want an explanation as to why they are allowing them to line up so far off the line of scrimmage than just let it go.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Rockmolder
15 years ago
I don't think it's a conspiracy, but I do think that they have our CBs on a lot shorter leash because they're known for their physical play. It's something the NFL doesn't like, physical and dominating defenses. They've been favoring the offense with rule changes for nearly 40 years now. Again, it's no conspiracy, but they are looking at players like Harris and Roy Williams closer than other DBs.

And on the O-line formation, I don't really mind. Like you said, it gives away what you're going to do in most situations. The biggest thing I can imagine that Dakota has a problem with is that they have the front of the tackles should at least overlap the back of the center. So they should be on one line in essence. Like I said, it's been borderline illegal, but you're getting away with it every single time so far.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (4h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (6h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (22h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.