RaiderPride
15 years ago
So now it is about Rodgers not getting the ball away fast enough. Not running enough.

Fuck.... The guy is getting killed out there. But He is not on the injury list.

So....

Do I need to go back to when Aaron played half a game against Dallas with a broken foot. You remember... When he was injured. Twice.

And so many Packer Fan posters.... (Hazer You Were Leading That Band Wagon.) at that time were suggesting he was "Inury Prone" "Made of glass." "Not near as tough as Brett." "Will Never Make it" "A Pussy." Will Never Be Tough Enough to make it at the NFL Level.

WELL.... I Think Young Aaron has made every one who jumped on the "Not Tough Enough" band wagon should hang their head in shame... and not even comment on Aaron for two more years.

Call it a two year (Aaron.) posting penalty for throwing the kid under the bus for jumping on his ass, for pre judging him as being injury prone.

Aaron is as durable as any champion I have seen... And Tough As Nails from what I have seen.

Step Back... Admire how tough he is... Then let's talk about getting the ball of faster, or fixing the O Line.

GIVE ARRON HIS DUE RESPECT. FOR BEING TOUGH, DURABLE, AND A MAN'S MAN IN THE POCKET.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
IronMan
15 years ago



GIVE ARRON HIS DUE RESPECT. FOR BEING TOUGH, DURABLE, AND A MAN'S MAN IN THE POCKET.

"RaiderPride" wrote:



Several people here have given him respect for being tough. That doesn't mean that his is above being criticized.

He HAS held the ball too long on a few occasions. That is a fact. It isn't Rodgers hating or being nit picky. Its a fact.

Z2C said it best here:

I think the whole thought of get off Rodgers because he's not perfect is way over board. I don't think anyone has mentioned anything remotely close to implying that Rodgers IS the problem. What we are saying (and this is jus my opinion of what I've said an read) is that we'd like to see the man throw the ball a bit quicker to avoid the pressure.

Someone else said this too, if we're going to be bitching about his releasing the ball too late, and that's the biggest gripe, then we're in pretty damn good hands at QB. I agree with that and feel the same. BUT, just because he does 9 things right, doesn't mean I'm going to NOT say something about the one thing he does wrong.

I think his mobility is great. He has good arm strength, OVERALL good decision making, good accuracy, but I think he needs more experience to learn the defenses better and to hit his hot read's faster. it will come in time. No one is throwing the man to wolves, just simply stating a fact. He needs to play hot potato with that ball sometimes.

PackerBuddha
15 years ago

I get it, the O-line sucks. But I my whole issue has to do more with Rodgers progression as an NFL player.

My problem is simply that he holds on to the ball too much just like he did in game #1 as opposed to game #20. The O-line is terrible, there is no debating that but IMO Rodgers is blame a lot more than 15%. I think a lot of sacks are 50/50. Even when Favre was giving them up left and right in the first 3 games, I said the same thing.

1) As a QB, its your job to read blitzes, if your giving up a lot of sacks where you have no time to react, then you probably failed to read the defence properly and get it out with a quick slant, etc. - That may have to do with coaching though and their instructions to him/latitude to call plays. That will come with time but you cannot expect the O-line/RB to pick up every single blitz, it doesn't happen.

2) You have to sometimes just plain get rid of the ball. For example, that safety. I do not understand how that is even remotely the O-line's fault. Your at the half yard line. You konw you have a couple of seconds MAX to get rid of it. That is on Rodgers. And I hate when he thinks hes faster than he is. Yes he's mobile but he is not Michael Vick. You think your going to outrun Jarden Allen out of the endzone, your not. Play within yourself. Even on last year's safety too, Jarden Allen just plain ran him down.

3) You have to take risks sometimes. I get it, he doesn't get a lot of INTs but I think sometimes you have to take risks. He seems to not want to pull the trigger if its close. But I think you can play like that if you have the Ravens defence of 2008 or whatever. Just like I said last year, our defence is not an elite defense, so take the risks.

Overall, I like Rodgers progression. But this part of his game gets me antsy. He's a statistical giant but a lot of times he gets these 70 yard, 1 minute drives down by two touchdowns. I hate when people just look at stats and scream "whatever look at his stats". Its not all about stats otherwise Warren Moon and Dan Marino would be the two greatest QBs in the history of the NFL. But their not, its about something else, winning. Either your a winner or your not.

Do I think the true "legends" just happen to have the best teams every year, i.e. Manning, Favre, Brady. No. For example, Jets. This was the Mangenius Jets, not the Rex Ryan Jets and they went from 4-12 to 9-7 (including 8-3 at one point) with Favre. And the Packers went from 13-3 to 6-10. Maybe its all just concidence that happens or that the Colts are good EVERY single year, who knows.

But IMO, the most important position in football is exactly that, the most important position. Tahts why I think Rodgers has a lot more control over sacks than just a passive bystander. The O-line sucks but at least show some kind of sign of progression is all I'm asking for. But this excuse that its all the O-line will only hurt his progression in the long run IMO.

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



I wasnt aware that Favre played D...how many times last year did Rodgers put the team in a position to win, just to have the defense blow it late in the 4th? The offense put up the same type of numbers last year as they did with Favre, it was the defense that failed to show up.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
You fail to realize it's the quarterback's primary responsibility to pull a come-from-behind victory out of his ass in the final 60 seconds of every game.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
Why does every NFL coach say the Oline has to give a QB a minumum of 3 seconds to throw the ball? Because in most cases that is how long it takes. Rodgers is getting pressure quicker than that. When a QB drops back, he has to look and find an open WR, and if that doesn't happen, needs to look for a place where he can throw the ball away, or run to escape.

With how fast Rodgers is getting pressured, he would need to be looking for that escape path, or place to throw the ball away, as soon as he gets the snap and dropping back. but to make everyone happy Rodgers is going to start, 1 step, turn and throw at the opposing coach.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
And then people will bitch that his completion percentage is in the toilet. And as soon as opposing defenses catch on to what he's doing, they'll be looking to jump his throws. But hey, he won't be taking sacks.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

And then people will bitch that his completion percentage is in the toilet. And as soon as opposing defenses catch on to what he's doing, they'll be looking to jump his throws. But hey, he won't be taking sacks.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I'll take a lower completion percentage for a few more wins and my QB's health. And if he's throwing the ball away, let the defenses JUMP all they want. No one is saying throw it into coverage. Get off it already.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I'm not advocating he takes more sacks. I'm saying I don't think Rodgers can win right now no matter what he does. I think a lot of Packers fans want their pound of flesh and won't be satisfied until they get it, though even they aren't sure what it will look like.
UserPostedImage
IronMan
15 years ago

I'm not advocating he takes more sacks. I'm saying I don't think Rodgers can win right now no matter what he does. I think a lot of Packers fans want their pound of flesh and won't be satisfied until they get it, though even they aren't sure what it will look like.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I guarantee you that Rodgers is far more critical of himself, than anyone else is.
warhawk
15 years ago

And then people will bitch that his completion percentage is in the toilet. And as soon as opposing defenses catch on to what he's doing, they'll be looking to jump his throws. But hey, he won't be taking sacks.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I totally agree that that's not going to be the fix.

We are team with the talent at QB and WR to be dangerous downfield. What that does is SPREAD the defense because they have to honor the fact they could get burned deep.

What has happened and what would happen if we just go three step drop and throw short all the time is tighten the lanes because the DB's, not having to worry about the deep ball, can concentrate on what's in front of them and not worry about getting run by.

The 0 line has GOT to allow Rodgers and the receivers to take shots downfield. They don't have to give him five seconds every time but there has to be enough protection that the defense has to respect all the cards in our offenses hand.

The strongest point of our offense is the ability of Rodgers to go deep and the threats we have in Jennings, Driver, and the TE's. No, it's not all about stats. For the offense it's about scoring points. When you take the scariest part of your scheme off the table, especially with a mediocre run offense, I don't see where designing a pass offense to reduce the sacks is going to produce more points.

Our offense is more like what defenses have to face with Peyton Manning or Drew Brees. You take the field away past twenty yards downfield away from those guys and see how hard it starts getting to score points.
"The train is leaving the station."
Fan Shout
dfosterf (8h) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (13h) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (1-Apr) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol 😂
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Former NFL. I think Packers too
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : NFL RB Leshon Johnson has been charged in a massive dog fighting operation, with the FBI seizing over 190 Pit Bulls
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Some real irony of a QB as short as Wilson playing for the Giants
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Giants country, let's be the tall beings of lore!
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Russell Wilson signs with the Giants.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (25-Mar) : I don't think there is a significant difference. I use a user name for many. Others email.
Martha Careful (25-Mar) : email
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : would it be better to use EMAIL or USERNAME to log into a site?
wpr (25-Mar) : Thanks Zero
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : New forum has the ability to Thank a post now.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
47m / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

9-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

8-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-Mar / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

24-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.